Literature DB >> 24121413

The price of racial bias: intergroup negotiations in the ultimatum game.

Jennifer T Kubota1, Jian Li, Eyal Bar-David, Mahzarin R Banaji, Elizabeth A Phelps.   

Abstract

Existing stereotypes about Black Americans may influence perceptions of intent during financial negotiations. In this study, we explored whether the influence of race on economic decisions extends to choices that are costly to the decision maker. We investigated whether racial group membership contributes to differential likelihood of rejection of objectively equal unfair monetary offers. In the Ultimatum Game, players accept or reject proposed splits of money. Players keep accepted splits, but if a player rejects an offer, both the player and the proposer receive nothing. We found that participants accepted more offers and lower offer amounts from White proposers than from Black proposers, and that this pattern was accentuated for participants with higher implicit race bias. These findings indicate that participants are willing to discriminate against Black proposers even at a cost to their own financial gain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ultimatum Game; behavioral economics; decision making; implicit race bias; intergroup dynamics; prejudice; racial and ethnic attitudes and relations; social behavior

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24121413      PMCID: PMC4028070          DOI: 10.1177/0956797613496435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  11 in total

1.  The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game.

Authors:  Alan G Sanfey; James K Rilling; Jessica A Aronson; Leigh E Nystrom; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm.

Authors:  Anthony G Greenwald; Brian A Nosek; Mahzarin R Banaji
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2003-08

3.  Affective state and decision-making in the Ultimatum Game.

Authors:  Mascha van 't Wout; René S Kahn; Alan G Sanfey; André Aleman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Ethnic out-group faces are biased in the prejudiced mind.

Authors:  Ron Dotsch; Daniël H J Wigboldus; Oliver Langner; Ad van Knippenberg
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-10

5.  Intergroup norms and intergroup discrimination: distinctive self-categorization and social identity effects.

Authors:  J Jetten; R Spears; A S Manstead
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1996-12

6.  Self-interest and fairness in problems of resource allocation: allocators versus recipients.

Authors:  K A Diekmann; S M Samuels; L Ross; M H Bazerman
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1997-05

7.  Experiments in intergroup discrimination.

Authors:  H Taijfel
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 2.142

8.  Physicians' implicit and explicit attitudes about race by MD race, ethnicity, and gender.

Authors:  Janice Sabin; Brian A Nosek; Anthony Greenwald; Frederick P Rivara
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2009-08

9.  Is race medically relevant? A qualitative study of physicians' attitudes about the role of race in treatment decision-making.

Authors:  Shedra Amy Snipes; Sherrill L Sellers; Adebola Odunlami Tafawa; Lisa A Cooper; Julie C Fields; Vence L Bonham
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Implicit bias among physicians and its prediction of thrombolysis decisions for black and white patients.

Authors:  Alexander R Green; Dana R Carney; Daniel J Pallin; Long H Ngo; Kristal L Raymond; Lisa I Iezzoni; Mahzarin R Banaji
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  23 in total

1.  Cognitive and neural bases of decision-making causing civilian casualties during intergroup conflict.

Authors:  Xiaochun Han; Shuai Zhou; Nardine Fahoum; Taoyu Wu; Tianyu Gao; Simone Shamay-Tsoory; Michele J Gelfand; Xinhuai Wu; Shihui Han
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-03-08

2.  Differential developmental courses of implicit and explicit biases for different other-race classes.

Authors:  Miao K Qian; Gail D Heyman; Paul C Quinn; Genyue Fu; Kang Lee
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2019-04-04

3.  Differences in fairness and trust between lean and corpulent men.

Authors:  B Kubera; J Klement; C Wagner; C Rädel; J Eggeling; S Füllbrunn; M C Kaczmarek; R Levinsky; A Peters
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 5.095

4.  Mortality salience reduces the discrimination between in-group and out-group interactions: A functional MRI investigation using multi-voxel pattern analysis.

Authors:  Chunliang Feng; Bobby Azarian; Yina Ma; Xue Feng; Lili Wang; Yue-Jia Luo; Frank Krueger
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Race influences professional investors' financial judgments.

Authors:  Sarah Lyons-Padilla; Hazel Rose Markus; Ashby Monk; Sid Radhakrishna; Radhika Shah; Norris A Daryn Dodson; Jennifer L Eberhardt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Development of in-group favoritism in children's third-party punishment of selfishness.

Authors:  Jillian J Jordan; Katherine McAuliffe; Felix Warneken
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Configural face processing impacts race disparities in humanization and trust.

Authors:  Brittany S Cassidy; Anne C Krendl; Kathleen A Stanko; Robert J Rydell; Steven G Young; Kurt Hugenberg
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2017-07-05

8.  Implicit Social Biases in People With Autism.

Authors:  Elina Birmingham; Damian Stanley; Remya Nair; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-09-18

Review 9.  Group bias in cooperative norm enforcement.

Authors:  Katherine McAuliffe; Yarrow Dunham
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 10.  Reframing social categorization as latent structure learning for understanding political behaviour.

Authors:  Tatiana Lau
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.