Wieger Horstmann1, Bart Kuipers2, David Ohanis2, Robert Slappendel3, Boudewijn Kollen4, Cees Verheyen2. 1. Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem, The Netherlands. 2. Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Quality and Safety, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands. 4. Department of General Practice, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Post-operative anaemia following total knee arthroplasty is reported to impede functional mobility in the early period following surgery, whereas allogeneic blood transfusions, used to correct low post-operative haemoglobin levels, have concomitant disadvantages. The use of a post-operative autologous blood re-transfusion drainage system as well as no drainage system following total knee arthroplasty have been shown to reduce peri-operative blood loss and allogeneic blood transfusions, compared to the regularly used closed-suction drains. No randomised studies have been performed, to the best of our knowledge, that indicate the superiority of either method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An open, randomised controlled study was conducted in 115 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty who were randomly allocated to an autotransfusion drain or no drainage system. The primary end-point was haemoglobin level on the first post-operative day. RESULTS: In the autotransfusion group 515 mL (0-1,500 mL) of drained blood was re-transfused within the first 6 hours after surgery. Haemoglobin levels on the first (11.6 vs 11.0 g/dL), second (11.0 vs 10.3 g/dL) and third (10.5 vs 9.8 g/dL) days after surgery were significantly higher in the autotransfusion group. Total peri-operative net blood loss (1,576 mL vs 1,837 mL; -P=0.03) and allogeneic transfusion rates (10.2% vs 19.6%; P=0.15) were lower in the autotransfusion group. There were no differences in pain scores, range of motion or adverse events during hospital stay and the first 3 months after surgery. DISCUSSION: Compared with no drainage, the use of a post-operative autologous blood re-transfusion drainage system following total knee arthroplasty results in higher post-operative haemoglobin levels and less total blood loss.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Post-operative anaemia following total knee arthroplasty is reported to impede functional mobility in the early period following surgery, whereas allogeneic blood transfusions, used to correct low post-operative haemoglobin levels, have concomitant disadvantages. The use of a post-operative autologous blood re-transfusion drainage system as well as no drainage system following total knee arthroplasty have been shown to reduce peri-operative blood loss and allogeneic blood transfusions, compared to the regularly used closed-suction drains. No randomised studies have been performed, to the best of our knowledge, that indicate the superiority of either method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An open, randomised controlled study was conducted in 115 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty who were randomly allocated to an autotransfusion drain or no drainage system. The primary end-point was haemoglobin level on the first post-operative day. RESULTS: In the autotransfusion group 515 mL (0-1,500 mL) of drained blood was re-transfused within the first 6 hours after surgery. Haemoglobin levels on the first (11.6 vs 11.0 g/dL), second (11.0 vs 10.3 g/dL) and third (10.5 vs 9.8 g/dL) days after surgery were significantly higher in the autotransfusion group. Total peri-operative net blood loss (1,576 mL vs 1,837 mL; -P=0.03) and allogeneic transfusion rates (10.2% vs 19.6%; P=0.15) were lower in the autotransfusion group. There were no differences in pain scores, range of motion or adverse events during hospital stay and the first 3 months after surgery. DISCUSSION: Compared with no drainage, the use of a post-operative autologous blood re-transfusion drainage system following total knee arthroplasty results in higher post-operative haemoglobin levels and less total blood loss.
Authors: D Strümper; E W G Weber; S Gielen-Wijffels; R Van Drumpt; S Bulstra; R Slappendel; M E Durieux; M A E Marcus Journal: Transfusion Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Ahmad Gharehbaghian; Kharaja M G Haque; Carol Truman; Rachel Evans; Ruth Morse; John Newman; Gordon Bannister; Chris Rogers; Benjamin A Bradley Journal: Lancet Date: 2004-03-27 Impact factor: 79.321