| Literature DB >> 24119747 |
Luciana Galetto1, Domenico Bosco, Cristina Marzachì.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Phytoplasmas are phloem-limited phytopathogenic wall-less bacteria and represent a major threat to agriculture worldwide. They are transmitted in a persistent, propagative manner by phloem-sucking Hemipteran insects. For gene expression studies based on mRNA quantification by RT-qPCR, stability of housekeeping genes is crucial. The aim of this study was the identification of reference genes to study the effect of phytoplasma infection on gene expression of two leafhopper vector species. The identified reference genes will be useful tools to investigate differential gene expression of leafhopper vectors upon phytoplasma infection.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24119747 PMCID: PMC3852609 DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-409
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
Details of the primer pairs used for qPCR
| Mq Fw | AACGGCTACCACATCCAAGG | 98 | 65°C | 81.5°C§ 82.2°C† | 99% | 0.982 | |
| Mq Rv2 | GCCTCGGATGAGTCCCG | ||||||
| ActFw832 | AAGGACCTGTACGCCAACAC | 190 | 65°C | 83°C§† | 83% | 0.987 | |
| ActRv1021 | GCTGGAAGGTGGACAGAGAG | ||||||
| ATPβFw622 | CGCTTTACTCAGGCTGGTTC | 171 | 60°C | 84.5°C§ 83.5°C† | 100% | 0.995 | |
| ATPβRv792 | GTCATCAGCTGGCACGTAGA | ||||||
| GAPFw632 | ATCCGTCGTCGACCTTACTG | 51 | 60°C | 77.8°C§ 77.5°C† | 99% | 0.998 | |
| GAPRv682 | TCATCGTAGCTGGCTTCCTTG | ||||||
| TMFw237 | AAACGCCGAGAGTGAGGTG | 225 | 60°C | 87.1°C§ | 85% | 0.892 | |
| TMRv461 | AAGAACCGAGCCTCCTTCAG | ||||||
| TMFw33 | GAAGCTGGAGAAGGACAACG | 143 | 60°C | 85.2°C† | 118% | 0.947 | |
| TMRv175 | TGTCCAGCTCGTTCTCAATG |
§Calculated by amplifying Euscelidius variegatus cDNA.
†Calculated by amplifying Macrosteles quadripunctulatus cDNA.
Figure 1Amplification profiles of candidate reference genes. Box plot of qPCR cycle threshold values (Cq) for candidate reference genes in the two phytoplasma vector species. The median is depicted as the line across the box; the box indicates the 25th and 75th percentiles; whiskers represent the 90th and 10th percentiles.
Reference genes ranked from the most to the least stable considering CYP-infected samples
| 1 | 0.77 | 0.708 | ||||
| 2 | 1.22 | 1.071 | ||||
| 3 | 1.24 | 1.151 | ||||
| 4 | 1.43 | 1.566 | ||||
| 5 | 2.13 | 2.381 | ||||
*Best combination of two genes according with geNorm (average expression stability M = 1.087).
¶Best combination of two genes according with Normfinder (stability value = 0.895).
In bold geNorm M values > 1.5.
Reference genes ranked from the most to the least stable considering healthy samples
| 1 | 0.82 | 1.474 | 0.450 | ||||
| 2 | 0.91 | 0.897 | |||||
| 3 | 1.04 | 1.016 | |||||
| 4 | 1.06 | 1.085 | |||||
| 5 | 1.80 | 1.552 | |||||
*Best combination of two genes according with geNorm (average expression stability M = 0.955).
¶Best combination of two genes according with Normfinder (stability value = 0.587).
In bold geNorm M values > 1.5.
Reference genes ranked from the most to the least stable considering all samples
| 1 | 0.79 | 0.529 | ||||
| 2 | 1.12 | 0.551 | ||||
| 3 | 1.12 | 0.691 | ||||
| 4 | 1.18 | 0.824 | ||||
| 5 | 2.15 | 1.275 | ||||
*Best combination of two genes according with geNorm (average expression stability M = 1.015).
¶Best combination of two genes according with Normfinder (stability value = 0.435).
In bold geNorm M values > 1.5.
Reference genes ranked from the most to the least stable considering CYP-infected samples
| 1 | 0.68 | 0.963 | 0.149 | |||
| 2 | 0.77 | 1.016 | 0.167 | |||
| 3 | 0.96 | 1.091 | 0.170 | |||
| 4 | 1.20 | 1.105 | 0.171 | |||
| 5 | 1.33 | 1.345 | 0.238 | |||
*Best combination of two genes according with geNorm (average expression stability M = 0.517).
¶Best combination of two genes according with Normfinder (stability value = 0.094).
Reference genes ranked from the most to the least stable considering healthy samples
| 1 | 0.31 | 1.225 | 0.127 | |||
| 2 | 1.01 | 1.296 | 0.130 | |||
| 3 | 1.06 | 1.366 | 0.160 | |||
| 4 | 1.14 | 1.482 | 0.170 | |||
| 5 | 1.46 | 0.176 | ||||
*Best combination of two genes according with geNorm (average expression stability M = 0.823).
¶Best combination of two genes according with Normfinder (stability value = 0.074).
In bold geNorm M values > 1.5.
Reference genes ranked from the most to the least stable considering all samples
| 1 | 0.56 | 1.143 | 0.041 | |||
| 2 | 0.89 | 1.220 | 0.044 | |||
| 3 | 1.18 | 1.256 | 0.045 | |||
| 4 | 1.24 | 1.366 | 0.049 | |||
| 5 | 1.27 | 1.423 | 0.063 | |||
*Best combination of two genes according with geNorm (average expression stability M = 0.759).
¶Best combination of two genes according with Normfinder (stability value = 0.030).
Reference genes ranked by geNorm in individuals sampled at different times after acquisition
| 1 | 0.826 | 1.440 | ||||
| 2 | 0.903 | 1.498 | ||||
| 3 | 0.916 | |||||
| 4 | 1.133 | |||||
| 5 | ||||||
*Best combination of two genes considering individuals sampled at 3 dpa (average expression stability M = 0.394).
¶Best combination of two genes considering individuals sampled at 20 dpa (average expression stability M = 0.806).
§Best combination of two genes considering individuals sampled at 40 dpa (average expression stability M = 0.864).
In bold geNorm M values > 1.5.