Literature DB >> 24119679

Finite element modeling of embolic coil deployment: multifactor characterization of treatment effects on cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics.

M Haithem Babiker1, Brian Chong, L Fernando Gonzalez, Sachmanik Cheema, David H Frakes.   

Abstract

Endovascular coiling is the most common treatment for cerebral aneurysms. During the treatment, a sequence of embolic coils with different stiffness, shapes, sizes, and lengths is deployed to fill the aneurysmal sac. Although coil packing density has been clinically correlated with treatment success, many studies have also reported success at low packing densities, as well as recurrence at high packing densities. Such reports indicate that other factors may influence treatment success. In this study, we used a novel finite element approach and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to investigate the effects of packing density, coil shape, aneurysmal neck size, and parent vessel flow rate on aneurysmal hemodynamics. The study examines a testbed of 80 unique CFD simulations of post-treatment flows in idealized basilar tip aneurysm models. Simulated coil deployments were validated against in vitro and in vivo deployments. Among the investigated factors, packing density had the largest effect on intra-aneurysmal velocities. However, multifactor analysis of variance showed that coil shape can also have considerable effects, depending on packing density and neck size. Further, linear regression analysis showed an inverse relationship between mean void diameter in the aneurysm and mean intra-aneurysmal velocities, which underscores the importance of coil distribution and thus coil shape. Our study suggests that while packing density plays a key role in determining post-treatment hemodynamics, other factors such as coil shape, aneurysmal geometry, and parent vessel flow may also be very important.
© 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebral aneurysm; Computational fluid dynamics; Embolic coil; Finite element model; Packing density

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24119679     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.08.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  17 in total

Review 1.  What does computational fluid dynamics tell us about intracranial aneurysms? A meta-analysis and critical review.

Authors:  Khalid M Saqr; Sherif Rashad; Simon Tupin; Kuniyasu Niizuma; Tamer Hassan; Teiji Tominaga; Makoto Ohta
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 6.200

2.  Computational fluid dynamics of cerebral aneurysm coiling using high-resolution and high-energy synchrotron X-ray microtomography: comparison with the homogeneous porous medium approach.

Authors:  Michael R Levitt; Michael C Barbour; Sabine Rolland du Roscoat; Christian Geindreau; Venkat K Chivukula; Patrick M McGah; John D Nerva; Ryan P Morton; Louis J Kim; Alberto Aliseda
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 5.836

3.  Finite element modeling of endovascular coiling and flow diversion enables hemodynamic prediction of complex treatment strategies for intracranial aneurysm.

Authors:  Robert J Damiano; Ding Ma; Jianping Xiang; Adnan H Siddiqui; Kenneth V Snyder; Hui Meng
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Hemodynamic differences by increasing low profile visualized intraluminal support (LVIS) stent local compaction across intracranial aneurysm orifice.

Authors:  Zhongbin Tian; Mingqi Zhang; Gaohui Li; Rongbo Jin; Xiaochang Leng; Ying Zhang; Kun Wang; Yisen Zhang; Xinjian Yang; Jianping Xiang; Jian Liu
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-08-23       Impact factor: 1.610

5.  Computational study for the effects of coil configuration on blood flow characteristics in coil-embolized cerebral aneurysm.

Authors:  Tomohiro Otani; Satoshi Ii; Tomoyoshi Shigematsu; Toshiyuki Fujinaka; Masayuki Hirata; Tomohiko Ozaki; Shigeo Wada
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Novel Geometric Approach for Virtual Coiling.

Authors:  Zihe Chen; Danyang Chen; Xiangyu Wang; Robert J Damiano; Hui Meng; Jinhui Xu
Journal:  Theor Comput Sci       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 0.827

Review 7.  Credibility, Replicability, and Reproducibility in Simulation for Biomedicine and Clinical Applications in Neuroscience.

Authors:  Lealem Mulugeta; Andrew Drach; Ahmet Erdemir; C A Hunt; Marc Horner; Joy P Ku; Jerry G Myers; Rajanikanth Vadigepalli; William W Lytton
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.081

8.  Hemodynamic effects of intracranial aneurysms from stent-induced straightening of parent vessels by stent-assisted coiling embolization.

Authors:  Xiaochang Leng; Hailin Wan; Gaohui Li; Yeqing Jiang; Lei Huang; Adnan H Siddiqui; Xiaolong Zhang; Jianping Xiang
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 1.610

9.  Outcomes following aneurysmal coil embolization with intentionally shortened low-profile visible intraluminal support stent deployment.

Authors:  Kenji Yatomi; Yumiko Mitome-Mishima; Takashi Fujii; Kohsuke Teranishi; Hidenori Oishi; Akihide Kondo
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2021-06-29

Review 10.  Structural Design of Vascular Stents: A Review.

Authors:  Chen Pan; Yafeng Han; Jiping Lu
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.