Literature DB >> 24119608

Expanded endonasal approach using vascularized septal flap reconstruction for skull base tumors has a negative impact on sinonasal symptoms and quality of life.

Isam Alobid1, Joaquim Enseñat, Franklin Mariño-Sánchez, Elena Rioja, Matteo de Notaris, Joaquim Mullol, Manuel Bernal-Sprekelsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery is currently the optimal treatment for skull base tumors. This study was designed to assess patient's sinonasal symptoms and quality of life (QoL) after resection of pituitary adenoma or skull base tumors using vascularized septal flap (VSF) reconstruction.
METHODS: Patients with pituitary adenoma underwent the transnasal transsphenoidal endoscopic approach (TTEA; n = 38), and patients with other benign parasellar tumors underwent the expanded endonasal approach (EEA; n = 17) with VSF. Assessment of sinonasal symptoms and QoL by the 36-item Short-Form (SF-36) and the 31-item Rhinosinusitis Outcome Measure (RSOM-31) were performed before and 3 months after surgery.
RESULTS: At baseline, the total seven-sinonasal symptom score (T7SSS) was similar between both groups. After surgery, T7SSS significantly increased in EEA but not in TTEA patients. EEA patients reported more smell loss (40.1 ± 26.2; p < 0.05) and posterior nasal discharge (49.3 ± 30.1; p < 0.05) than TTEA patients (21.6 ± 30.9 and 22.5 ± 27.5, respectively). At baseline, both groups had poorer SF-36 compared with the general population. TTEA patients had poorer QoL (on general health, vitality, and mental health) than EEA patients. After surgery, TTEA patients showed impaired physical role and bodily pain compared with baseline, and EEA patients showed impaired physical role and mental health. At baseline, RSOM scores were similar in TTEA and EEA groups. After surgery, EEA but not TTEA patients reported poorer nasal and general symptoms.
CONCLUSION: The EEA with VSF produces more sinonasal symptoms than pituitary surgery, surgery for skull base and pituitary tumors has negative impact on QoL, and functioning tumors have no further negative effect on sinonasal symptoms and QoL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24119608     DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2013.27.3932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy        ISSN: 1945-8932            Impact factor:   2.467


  15 in total

1.  Cerebrospinal fluid leaks in extended endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery: covering all the angles.

Authors:  Hussein Fathalla; Antonio Di Ieva; John Lee; Jennifer Anderson; Rowan Jing; Michael Solarski; Michael D Cusimano
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Free middle turbinate mucosal graft reconstruction after primary endoscopic endonasal pituitary surgery.

Authors:  Samuel J C Fishpool; Anthony Amato-Watkins; Caroline Hayhurst
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Long-term outcomes of endoscopic endonasal approach for skull base surgery: a prospective study.

Authors:  Elena Rioja; Manuel Bernal-Sprekelsen; Karla Enriquez; Joaquim Enseñat; Ricard Valero; Matteo de Notaris; Joaquim Mullol; Isam Alobid
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  The Olfactory Strip and Its Preservation in Endoscopic Pituitary Surgery Maintains Smell and Sinonasal Function.

Authors:  Richard J Harvey; Mark Winder; Andrew Davidson; Tim Steel; Sunny Nalavenkata; Nadine Mrad; Ali Bokhari; Henry Barham; Anna Knisely
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2015-06-15

5.  Free Mucosal Graft Reconstruction of the Septum after Nasoseptal Flap Harvest: A Novel Technique Using a Posterior Septal Free Mucosal Graft.

Authors:  Frederick Yoo; Edward C Kuan; Marvin Bergsneider; Marilene B Wang
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2016-12-09

6.  A Prospective Evaluation of Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Extended Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery for Benign Pituitary Gland Lesion.

Authors:  Narin Nard Carmel Neiderman; Anat Wengier; Omri Dominsky; Barak Ringel; Anton Warshavsky; Gilad Horowitz; Tomer Ziv Baran; Zvi Ram; Rachel Grossman; Dan Marian Fliss; Abergel Avraham
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-05-29

7.  Heterogeneity in Outcome Reporting in Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Christina Dorismond; Griffin D Santarelli; Brian D Thorp; Adam J Kimple; Charles S Ebert; Adam M Zanation
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2020-08-07

8.  Quality-of-life evaluation for patients submitted to nasal endoscopic surgery for resection of pituitary tumours.

Authors:  Ricardo Landini Lutaif Dolci; Lígia Tédde de Moraes; Ana Carolina Mayor de Carvalho; Jeniffer Cristina Kozechen Rickli; Jamile Lopes de Souza; Williams Escalante Encinas; José Viana Lima Junior; Nilza Maria Scalissi; Américo Rubens Leite Dos Santos; Paulo Roberto Lazarini
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Quality of Life before and after Endoscopic Pituitary Surgery as Measured by the Short-Form-36.

Authors:  Edward C Kuan; Frederick Yoo; Jennifer Chyu; Angela Oh; Marvin Bergsneider; Marilene B Wang
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2017-11-07

10.  Management of anterior skull base defect depending on its size and location.

Authors:  Manuel Bernal-Sprekelsen; Elena Rioja; Joaquim Enseñat; Karla Enriquez; Liza Viscovich; Freddy Enrique Agredo-Lemos; Isam Alobid
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.