Literature DB >> 24119510

Trends in utilization of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP and cholecystectomy over the past 25 years: a population-based study.

Dana C Moffatt1, B Nancy Yu2, Wiechun Yie2, Charles N Bernstein3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive, population-based data on ERCP use over the last 30 years in North America are lacking.
OBJECTIVE: To establish crude and age-adjusted population-based rates of ERCP, evaluate for changing indications for ERCP, and evaluate for interactions between cholecystectomy technique and ERCP use from 1984 to 2009.
DESIGN: Retrospective, comprehensive, population-based study.
SETTING: All inpatient and outpatient ERCPs and cholecystectomies in Manitoba, Canada from 1984 to 2009. PATIENTS: All residents of Manitoba, Canada with a history of ERCP and/or cholecystectomy. INTERVENTION: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Yearly crude and age-adjusted rates of ERCP (diagnostic and therapeutic) and cholecystectomy (open, laparoscopic, and with open bile duct exploration), and patient and/or procedure demographics.
RESULTS: The rate of ERCP/10,000 people increased from 7.70 (1984) to 13.86/10,000 (2009) (P = .001). Diagnostic ERCP declined from 7.28/10,000 (1984) to 1.11/10,000 (2009), and therapeutic ERCP increased from 0.42/10,000 (1984) to 12.75/10,000 (2009) (P < .001). ERCPs were more common in women (62%) and in older populations (60-79 years, >80 years), with rates of therapeutic ERCP reaching 62.58/10,000 in the elderly. The primary indication for ERCP has changed over time, with biliary indications increasing from 50.3% to 67.3% and pancreatic indications decreasing from 18.3% to 8.1% (P < .05). The rate of therapeutic ERCP increased during the transition from open to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (1991-1994), whereas open bile duct exploration (OBDE) decreased from 2.0 to 0.18/10,000 (P < .001). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective analysis, administrative data.
CONCLUSION: ERCP use increased steadily from 1984 to 2009, and changed from a diagnostic modality to a therapeutic one. Changes in cholecystectomy technique may have influenced therapeutic ERCP use and likewise, the availability of therapeutic ERCP has decreased the need for OBDE.
Copyright © 2014 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24119510     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  19 in total

1.  Evolution in the utilization of biliary interventions in the United States: results of a nationwide longitudinal study from 1998 to 2013.

Authors:  Robert J Huang; Nirav C Thosani; Monique T Barakat; Abhishek Choudhary; Alka Mithal; Gurkirpal Singh; Saurabh Sethi; Subhas Banerjee
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Fiberoptic endoscopy: the singular transformative event of our time.

Authors:  C Mel Wilcox
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  National trends of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography utilization and outcomes in decompensated cirrhosis.

Authors:  Dhruv Mehta; Priti Poojary; Aparna Saha; Supreet Kaur; Shanti Patel; Lavneet Chawla; Arun Kumar; Priya Simoes; Deepthi Busayavalasa; Girish Nadkarni; Madhusudhan Sanaka
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Temporal trends in utilization and outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in acute cholangitis due to choledocholithiasis from 1998 to 2012.

Authors:  Malav P Parikh; Niyati M Gupta; Prashanthi N Thota; Rocio Lopez; Madhusudhan R Sanaka
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Evaluation of patients with abnormalities on intraoperative cholangiogram: time to abandon endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography as the initial follow-up study.

Authors:  Jason G Bill; Vladimir M Kushnir; Daniel K Mullady; Faris M Murad; Riad R Azar; Jeffery J Easler; Dayna S Early; Steven A Edmundowicz
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-16

6.  Racial disparities in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) utilization in the United States: are we getting better?

Authors:  Dushyant Singh Dahiya; Abhilash Perisetti; Neil Sharma; Sumant Inamdar; Hemant Goyal; Amandeep Singh; Laura Rotundo; Rajat Garg; Chin-I Cheng; Sailaja Pisipati; Mohammad Al-Haddad; Madhusudhan Sanaka
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.453

7.  A high-volume ERCP service led by surgeons is associated with good outcomes and meets national key performance indicators: results from a British district general hospital.

Authors:  Henry D De'Ath; Sathyan Nagendram; Eleanor Smith; Mohamed Ramadan; Darmarajah Veeramootoo; Sukhpal Singh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.453

8.  Cost Utility of Competing Strategies to Prevent Endoscopic Transmission of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Christopher V Almario; Folasade P May; Nicholas J Shaheen; Rekha Murthy; Kapil Gupta; Laith H Jamil; Simon K Lo; Brennan M R Spiegel
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  A Review of Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Shannon J Morales; Kartik Sampath; Timothy B Gardner
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2018-05

Review 10.  Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis.

Authors:  Adarsh M Thaker; Jeffrey D Mosko; Tyler M Berzin
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2014-11-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.