Literature DB >> 24119074

Urinary saturation: casual or causal risk factor in urolithiasis?

Allen L Rodgers1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess (i) the extent to which urinary supersaturation (SS) has successfully discriminated between stone formers and healthy individuals (N), (ii) whether absolute SS has diagnostic worth and (iii) whether high SS is the fundamental cause of stone formation per se.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Google Scholar was used to identify studies in which urinary compositional data had been determined. In those cases where SS values were not given, or where other risk indices had been reported, they were (re-)calculated. Collected data were termed 'global' but were then 'filtered' according to stone type and protocols used for SS calculations. SS distribution plots for calcium oxalate, brushite and uric acid were constructed. Data were statistically analysed using the unpaired t-test and Mann-Whitney test.
RESULTS: In all, 47 studies yielded 123 SS values for healthy individuals and 122 values for stone formers. The mean and median SS values were significantly greater in stone formers compared with healthy individuals in all but one of the comparisons. Wide variations in SS occurred for healthy individuals and stone formers. The two groups could not be separated.
CONCLUSIONS: Absolute SS has no diagnostic worth. It is impossible to quantify the meaning of a 'high' SS value. Urines cannot be identified as originating from healthy individuals or stone formers based on their SS. SS should be determined in clinical and research settings for relative comparisons during the assessment of treatment efficacies. This study provides a compelling argument for SS being a casual factor rather than a causal one.
© 2013 The Author. BJU International © 2013 BJU International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diagnostic worth; discriminator; risk factor; urinary saturation; urolithiasis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24119074     DOI: 10.1111/bju.12481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  6 in total

Review 1.  Physicochemical mechanisms of stone formation.

Authors:  Allen L Rodgers
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Experimental determination of multiple thermodynamic and kinetic risk factors for nephrolithiasis in the urine of healthy controls and calcium oxalate stone formers: does a universal discriminator exist?

Authors:  A L Rodgers; D Webber; B Hibberd
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Low Sodium Diet Decreases Stone Formation in Genetic Hypercalciuric Stone-Forming Rats.

Authors:  Nancy S Krieger; Marc Grynpas; Amy VandenEynde; John R Asplin; Kevin K Frick; Min Ho Kim; Felix M Ramos; Ignacio Granja; David A Bushinsky
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 2.847

Review 4.  Vision for the future on urolithiasis: research, management, education and training-some personal views.

Authors:  A Rodgers; A Trinchieri; M H Ather; N Buchholz
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 5.  Timelines of the "free-particle" and "fixed-particle" models of stone-formation: theoretical and experimental investigations.

Authors:  D J Kok; W Boellaard; Y Ridwan; V A Levchenko
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-12-03       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  LITHORISK.COM: the novel version of a software for calculating and visualizing the risk of renal stone.

Authors:  Martino Marangella; Michele Petrarulo; Corrado Vitale; Piergiuseppe Daniele; Silvio Sammartano
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 3.436

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.