AIM: Little attention has been paid to the effects of compliance and prescription practice on treatment outcome in HIV-infected children. In this context, an evaluation of the role of covariates on pharmacokinetics is required to establish the impact of differences in dosing regimens. Here we investigate whether a once daily dosing regimen of lamivudine provides comparable exposure to the currently approved paediatric regimen. METHODS: A hypothetical group of 180 patients between 3 months and 12 years old was used to evaluate the impact of body weight on systemic exposure to lamivudine. Simulation scenarios were evaluated using AUC and Cmax as parameters of interest. The analysis was performed using a population pharmacokinetic model previously implemented in nonmem v.6.2. RESULTS: The simulations show that once daily dosing of lamivudine yields comparable exposure to historical values observed in children and adults, both for liquid and solid dosage forms. Simulated steady-state AUC(0-24 h) and Cmax values after once daily doses ranged respectively from 9.9 mg l⁻¹ h and 1.9 mg l⁻¹ for children lighter than 14 kg to 13.75 mg l⁻¹ h and 3.0 mg l⁻¹ for children heavier than 30 kg. These values are comparable or higher than historical values observed after once daily dosing in children and adults. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings illustrate how dosing regimens can be evaluated taking into account the effects of developmental growth on drug disposition. Most importantly, they suggest that the reduction in dosing frequency to once daily leads to comparable lamivudine exposure, as observed after administration of a twice daily dosing regimen.
AIM: Little attention has been paid to the effects of compliance and prescription practice on treatment outcome in HIV-infectedchildren. In this context, an evaluation of the role of covariates on pharmacokinetics is required to establish the impact of differences in dosing regimens. Here we investigate whether a once daily dosing regimen of lamivudine provides comparable exposure to the currently approved paediatric regimen. METHODS: A hypothetical group of 180 patients between 3 months and 12 years old was used to evaluate the impact of body weight on systemic exposure to lamivudine. Simulation scenarios were evaluated using AUC and Cmax as parameters of interest. The analysis was performed using a population pharmacokinetic model previously implemented in nonmem v.6.2. RESULTS: The simulations show that once daily dosing of lamivudine yields comparable exposure to historical values observed in children and adults, both for liquid and solid dosage forms. Simulated steady-state AUC(0-24 h) and Cmax values after once daily doses ranged respectively from 9.9 mg l⁻¹ h and 1.9 mg l⁻¹ for children lighter than 14 kg to 13.75 mg l⁻¹ h and 3.0 mg l⁻¹ for children heavier than 30 kg. These values are comparable or higher than historical values observed after once daily dosing in children and adults. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings illustrate how dosing regimens can be evaluated taking into account the effects of developmental growth on drug disposition. Most importantly, they suggest that the reduction in dosing frequency to once daily leads to comparable lamivudine exposure, as observed after administration of a twice daily dosing regimen.
Authors: K H Moore; J E Barrett; S Shaw; G E Pakes; R Churchus; A Kapoor; J Lloyd; M G Barry; D Back Journal: AIDS Date: 1999-11-12 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: M D Kazatchkine; P N Van; D Costagliola; A S Mohammed; J M Ledeine; M Troccaz; L Belec Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2000-08-15 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: C A Boucher; N Cammack; P Schipper; R Schuurman; P Rouse; M A Wainberg; J M Cameron Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 1993-10 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Edwin DeJesus; Debra McCarty; Charles F Farthing; Denise D Shortino; Beatriz Grinsztejn; Deborah A Thomas; Shannon R Schrader; Steve A Castillo; Michael G Sension; Kevin Gough; Sam J Madison Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2004-07-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Geoffrey J Yuen; Yu Lou; Nancy F Bumgarner; Jim P Bishop; Glenn A Smith; Victoria R Otto; David D Hoelscher Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Esther J H Janssen; Diane E T Bastiaans; Pyry A J Välitalo; Annemarie M C van Rossum; Evelyne Jacqz-Aigrain; Hermione Lyall; Catherijne A J Knibbe; David M Burger Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2017-02-14 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Eric Vermeulen; John N van den Anker; Oscar Della Pasqua; Kalle Hoppu; Johanna H van der Lee Journal: J Pharm Pharmacol Date: 2016-09-27 Impact factor: 3.765