OBJECTIVE: To assess the pharmacokinetics of lamivudine phosphorylation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from patients infected with HIV-1. DESIGN: Single-center, open-label, randomized, two-period, cross-over study in 10 asymptomatic, antiretroviral-experienced, HIV-1-infected patients who had a CD4+ lymphocyte count of 200-500 x 10(6)/l and had received combination treatment withlamivudine 150 mg twice a day plus zidovudine 600 mg a day (divided into two or three doses) for > or = 16 weeks prior to study entry. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive lamivudine 150 mg twice a day or lamivudine 300 mg twice a day for 14 days, with at least a 48-h washout period between treatments. Serial blood samples were collected over 36 h for determination of lamivudine serum concentrations using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry and intracellular phosphate PBMC concentrations using high performance liquid chromatography/radioimmunoassay methods. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated based on lamivudine and lamivudine anabolite concentration-time data. RESULTS:Intracellular pharmacokinetic parameters were highly variable between patients (coefficient of variations approximately 50%). The two regimens produced lamivudine-total phosphate (totP) values of a similar magnitude. Although the 300-mg regimen tended to produce higher lamivudine-monophosphate (MP) and -triphosphate (TP) values, differences from values produced by the 150-mg regimen were not statistically significant. As lamivudine diphosphate (DP) was the predominant anabolite, accounting for 50-55% of lamivudine-totP (compared with 30-35% for lamivudine-MP and 15-20% for lamivudine-TP), the conversion of lamivudine-DP to lamivudine-TP can be regarded as the rate-limiting step. The median lamivudine-TP intracellular half-life (t1/2) for the 150-mg and 300-mg regimens did not differ significantly (15.3 and 16.1 h, respectively). Serum lamivudine pharmacokinetic parameters were consistent with those observed in previous studies in HIV-1-infected patients. No apparent linear relationships were observed between lamivudine intracellular anabolite and serum data. CONCLUSIONS: The intracellular pharmacokinetics of lamivudine phosphorylation in PBMC from asymptomatic HIV-1-infected patients are highly variable and do not differ statistically between the 150- and 300-mg twice a day regimens. The variations in intracellular lamivudine-TP concentrations following these two lamivudine dosage regimens are unlikely to result in differences in clinical effect. This was confirmed by the results of a large phase III study in HIV-1-infected patients which showed no differences in HIV-1 RNA or CD4+ lymphocyte counts between the 150- and 300-mg lamivudine regimens in combination with zidovudine.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To assess the pharmacokinetics of lamivudine phosphorylation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from patients infected with HIV-1. DESIGN: Single-center, open-label, randomized, two-period, cross-over study in 10 asymptomatic, antiretroviral-experienced, HIV-1-infectedpatients who had a CD4+ lymphocyte count of 200-500 x 10(6)/l and had received combination treatment with lamivudine 150 mg twice a day plus zidovudine 600 mg a day (divided into two or three doses) for > or = 16 weeks prior to study entry. METHODS:Patients were randomly assigned to receive lamivudine 150 mg twice a day or lamivudine 300 mg twice a day for 14 days, with at least a 48-h washout period between treatments. Serial blood samples were collected over 36 h for determination of lamivudine serum concentrations using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry and intracellular phosphate PBMC concentrations using high performance liquid chromatography/radioimmunoassay methods. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated based on lamivudine and lamivudine anabolite concentration-time data. RESULTS: Intracellular pharmacokinetic parameters were highly variable between patients (coefficient of variations approximately 50%). The two regimens produced lamivudine-total phosphate (totP) values of a similar magnitude. Although the 300-mg regimen tended to produce higher lamivudine-monophosphate (MP) and -triphosphate (TP) values, differences from values produced by the 150-mg regimen were not statistically significant. As lamivudine diphosphate (DP) was the predominant anabolite, accounting for 50-55% of lamivudine-totP (compared with 30-35% for lamivudine-MP and 15-20% for lamivudine-TP), the conversion of lamivudine-DP to lamivudine-TP can be regarded as the rate-limiting step. The median lamivudine-TP intracellular half-life (t1/2) for the 150-mg and 300-mg regimens did not differ significantly (15.3 and 16.1 h, respectively). Serum lamivudine pharmacokinetic parameters were consistent with those observed in previous studies in HIV-1-infectedpatients. No apparent linear relationships were observed between lamivudine intracellular anabolite and serum data. CONCLUSIONS: The intracellular pharmacokinetics of lamivudine phosphorylation in PBMC from asymptomatic HIV-1-infectedpatients are highly variable and do not differ statistically between the 150- and 300-mg twice a day regimens. The variations in intracellular lamivudine-TP concentrations following these two lamivudine dosage regimens are unlikely to result in differences in clinical effect. This was confirmed by the results of a large phase III study in HIV-1-infectedpatients which showed no differences in HIV-1 RNA or CD4+ lymphocyte counts between the 150- and 300-mg lamivudine regimens in combination with zidovudine.
Authors: A Plettenberg; D Albrecht; T Lorenzen; V Paech; H Petersen; T Fenner; T Meyer; R Arndt; K Hertogs; R Pauwels; T Weitzel; A Stoehr Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Rieneke M E van Praag; Elisabeth C M van Weert; Rolf P G van Heeswijk; Xiao-Jian Zhou; Jean-Pierre Sommadossi; Suzanne Jurriaans; Joep M A Lange; Richard M W Hoetelmans; Jan M Prins Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: R Bruno; M B Regazzi; V Ciappina; P Villani; P Sacchi; M Montagna; R Panebianco; G Filice Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2001 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: S Levine; D Hernandez; G Yamanaka; S Zhang; R Rose; S Weinheimer; R J Colonno Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Paul R Bohjanen; Melissa D Johnson; Lynda A Szczech; Dannah W Wray; William P Petros; Cameron R Miller; Charles B Hicks Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 5.191