AIMS: The Far Upstream Element [FUSE] Binding Protein 1 (FUBP1) regulates target genes, such as the cell cycle regulators MYC and p21. FUBP1 is up-regulated in many tumours and acts as an oncoprotein by stimulating proliferation and inhibiting apoptosis. Recently, FUBP1 mutations were identified in approximately 15% of oligodendrogliomas. To date, all reported FUBP1 mutations have been predicted to inactivate FUBP1, which suggests that in contrast to most other tumours FUBP1 may act as a tumour suppressor in oligodendrogliomas. METHODS: As no data are currently available concerning FUBP1 protein levels in gliomas, we examined the FUBP1 expression profiles of human glial tumours by immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence. We analysed FUBP1 expression related to morphological differentiation, IDH1 and FUBP1 mutation status, 1p/19q loss of heterozygosity (LOH) as well as proliferation rate. RESULTS: Our findings demonstrate that FUBP1 expression levels are increased in all glioma subtypes as compared with normal central nervous system (CNS) control tissue and are associated with increased proliferation. In contrast, FUBP1 immunonegativity predicted FUBP1 mutation with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 90% in our cohort and was associated with oligodendroglial differentiation, IDH1 mutation and 1p/19q loss of heterozygosity (LOH). Using this approach, we detected a to-date undescribed FUBP1 mutation in an oligodendroglioma. CONCLUSION: In summary, our data indicate an association between of FUBP1 expression and proliferation in gliomas. Furthermore, our findings present FUBP1 immunohistochemical analysis as a helpful additional tool for neuropathological glioma diagnostics predicting FUBP1 mutation.
AIMS: The Far Upstream Element [FUSE] Binding Protein 1 (FUBP1) regulates target genes, such as the cell cycle regulators MYC and p21. FUBP1 is up-regulated in many tumours and acts as an oncoprotein by stimulating proliferation and inhibiting apoptosis. Recently, FUBP1 mutations were identified in approximately 15% of oligodendrogliomas. To date, all reported FUBP1 mutations have been predicted to inactivate FUBP1, which suggests that in contrast to most other tumoursFUBP1 may act as a tumour suppressor in oligodendrogliomas. METHODS: As no data are currently available concerning FUBP1 protein levels in gliomas, we examined the FUBP1 expression profiles of humanglial tumours by immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence. We analysed FUBP1 expression related to morphological differentiation, IDH1 and FUBP1 mutation status, 1p/19q loss of heterozygosity (LOH) as well as proliferation rate. RESULTS: Our findings demonstrate that FUBP1 expression levels are increased in all glioma subtypes as compared with normal central nervous system (CNS) control tissue and are associated with increased proliferation. In contrast, FUBP1 immunonegativity predicted FUBP1 mutation with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 90% in our cohort and was associated with oligodendroglial differentiation, IDH1 mutation and 1p/19q loss of heterozygosity (LOH). Using this approach, we detected a to-date undescribed FUBP1 mutation in an oligodendroglioma. CONCLUSION: In summary, our data indicate an association between of FUBP1 expression and proliferation in gliomas. Furthermore, our findings present FUBP1 immunohistochemical analysis as a helpful additional tool for neuropathological glioma diagnostics predicting FUBP1 mutation.
Authors: Peter Baumgarten; Anna-Eva Blank; Kea Franz; Elke Hattingen; Maika Dunst; Pia Zeiner; Katharina Hoffmann; Oliver Bähr; Lisa Mäder; Benjamin Goeppert; Marcia Machein; Volker Seifert; Joachim P Steinbach; Karl H Plate; Patrick N Harter; Michel Mittelbronn Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2015-11-30 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Krishna M Talasila; Gro V Røsland; Hanne R Hagland; Eskil Eskilsson; Irene H Flønes; Sabrina Fritah; Francisco Azuaje; Nadia Atai; Patrick N Harter; Michel Mittelbronn; Michael Andersen; Justin V Joseph; Jubayer Al Hossain; Laurent Vallar; Cornelis J F van Noorden; Simone P Niclou; Frits Thorsen; Karl Johan Tronstad; Charalampos Tzoulis; Rolf Bjerkvig; Hrvoje Miletic Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Weixin Zhou; Yang Jo Chung; Edgardo R Parrilla Castellar; Ying Zheng; Hye-Jung Chung; Russell Bandle; Juhong Liu; Lino Tessarollo; Eric Batchelor; Peter D Aplan; David Levens Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2016-01-14 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: William Putzbach; Quan Q Gao; Monal Patel; Stijn van Dongen; Ashley Haluck-Kangas; Aishe A Sarshad; Elizabeth T Bartom; Kwang-Youn A Kim; Denise M Scholtens; Markus Hafner; Jonathan C Zhao; Andrea E Murmann; Marcus E Peter Journal: Elife Date: 2017-10-24 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: P Balermpas; F Rödel; R Liberz; J Oppermann; J Wagenblast; S Ghanaati; P N Harter; M Mittelbronn; C Weiss; C Rödel; E Fokas Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 7.640