BACKGROUND: Thus far, four soy allergens have been characterized. Their diagnostic value was assessed only using a case-control design with controls not suspected of soy allergy or in a soy-allergic population without controls. Our objective was to analyze the diagnostic value of specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) to Gly m 2S albumin, Gly m 4, 5, and 6, and their possible relation with severity or culprit soy product. METHODS: Adult patients suspected of soy allergy were included (n = 46). Allergy was confirmed by challenge (n = 19) or history (n = 16) and excluded by challenge in 11 patients. Soy components were analyzed by ImmunoCAP. Diagnostic value was assessed in the challenged patient group by an area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). RESULTS: Specific immunoglobulin E to Gly m 2S albumin had the highest AUC (0.79), comparable to skin prick test (SPT) and sIgE to soy extract (0.76 and 0.77, respectively). All patients were sensitized to either soy extract or Gly m 4 (sIgE ≥ 0.35 kU/l). sIgE to soy extract, Gly m 5, and Gly m 6 was significantly higher in patients with mild symptoms (P = 0.04, 0.02 and 0.02, respectively). Patients only reacting to soy milk had higher sIgE levels to Gly m 4 (median 9.8 vs 1.1 kU/l, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Specific immunoglobulin E to Gly m 2S albumin had the best accuracy in diagnosing soy allergy. Gly m 5 and 6 were related to mild symptoms. Higher levels of Gly m 4 were related to allergy to soy milk.
BACKGROUND: Thus far, four soy allergens have been characterized. Their diagnostic value was assessed only using a case-control design with controls not suspected of soy allergy or in a soy-allergic population without controls. Our objective was to analyze the diagnostic value of specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) to Gly m 2S albumin, Gly m 4, 5, and 6, and their possible relation with severity or culprit soy product. METHODS: Adult patients suspected of soy allergy were included (n = 46). Allergy was confirmed by challenge (n = 19) or history (n = 16) and excluded by challenge in 11 patients. Soy components were analyzed by ImmunoCAP. Diagnostic value was assessed in the challenged patient group by an area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). RESULTS: Specific immunoglobulin E to Gly m 2S albumin had the highest AUC (0.79), comparable to skin prick test (SPT) and sIgE to soy extract (0.76 and 0.77, respectively). All patients were sensitized to either soy extract or Gly m 4 (sIgE ≥ 0.35 kU/l). sIgE to soy extract, Gly m 5, and Gly m 6 was significantly higher in patients with mild symptoms (P = 0.04, 0.02 and 0.02, respectively). Patients only reacting to soy milk had higher sIgE levels to Gly m 4 (median 9.8 vs 1.1 kU/l, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Specific immunoglobulin E to Gly m 2S albumin had the best accuracy in diagnosing soy allergy. Gly m 5 and 6 were related to mild symptoms. Higher levels of Gly m 4 were related to allergy to soy milk.
Authors: Matthew E Daly; Kai Wang; Xiaoyan Pan; Rosa L Depau; Justin Marsh; Francesco Capozzi; Phil Johnson; Lee A Gethings; E N Clare Mills Journal: Foods Date: 2022-07-06
Authors: Mark A Blankestijn; André C Knulst; Edward F Knol; Thuy-My Le; Heike Rockmann; Henny G Otten; Rob J B Klemans Journal: Clin Transl Allergy Date: 2017-11-23 Impact factor: 5.871
Authors: Jarmila Celakovská; Josef Bukac; Karel Ettler; Jaroslava Vaneckova; Irena Krcmova; Kvetuse Ettlerova; Jan Krejsek Journal: Indian J Dermatol Date: 2019 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.494