Literature DB >> 24117249

Building an open academic environment - a new approach to empowering students in their learning of anatomy through 'Shadow Modules'.

Jonathan L Scott1, Bernard J Moxham, Stephen M Rutherford.   

Abstract

Teaching and learning in anatomy is undertaken by a variety of methodologies, yet all of these pedagogies benefit from students discussing and reflecting upon their learning activities. An approach of particular potency is peer-mediated learning, through either peer-teaching or collaborative peer-learning. Collaborative, peer-mediated, learning activities help promote deep learning approaches and foster communities of practice in learning. Students generally flourish in collaborative learning settings but there are limitations to the benefits of collaborative learning undertaken solely within the confines of modular curricula. We describe the development of peer-mediated learning through student-focused and student-led study groups we have termed 'Shadow Modules'. The 'Shadow Module' takes place parallel to the formal academically taught module and facilitates collaboration between students to support their learning for that module. In 'Shadow Module' activities, students collaborate towards curating existing online open resources as well as developing learning resources of their own to support their study. Through the use of communication technologies and Web 2.0 tools these resources are able to be shared with their peers, thus enhancing the learning experience of all students following the module. The Shadow Module activities have the potential to lead to participants feeling a greater sense of engagement with the subject material, as well as improving their study and group-working skills and developing digital literacy. The outputs from Shadow Module collaborative work are open-source and may be utilised by subsequent student cohorts, thus building up a repository of learning resources designed by and for students. Shadow Module activities would benefit all pedagogies in the study of anatomy, and support students moving from being passive consumers to active participants in learning.
© 2013 Anatomical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Web 2.0; collaborative learning; communities of practice; computer-supported collaborative learning; peer-learning; peer-teaching; social media

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24117249      PMCID: PMC3931540          DOI: 10.1111/joa.12112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  18 in total

1.  Twelve tips for peer-assisted learning: a classic concept revisited.

Authors:  Ashar Wadoodi; Joy R Crosby
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.650

2.  Teaching anatomy without cadavers.

Authors:  John C McLachlan; John Bligh; Paul Bradley; Judy Searle
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.251

3.  To what extent is cadaver dissection necessary to learn medical gross anatomy? A debate forum.

Authors:  Geoffrey D Guttmann; Richard L Drake; Robert B Trelease
Journal:  Anat Rec B New Anat       Date:  2004-11

4.  New path for teaching anatomy: living anatomy and medical imaging vs. dissection.

Authors:  John C McLachlan
Journal:  Anat Rec B New Anat       Date:  2004-11

5.  An investigation into medical students' approaches to anatomy learning in a systems-based prosection course.

Authors:  Claire France Smith; Haydn Mathias
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.414

6.  The relationships between learning outcomes and methods of teaching anatomy as perceived by professional anatomists.

Authors:  K M Patel; B J Moxham
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.414

7.  Objective and subjective assessment of reciprocal peer teaching in medical gross anatomy laboratory.

Authors:  Brian S Bentley; Robert V Hill
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Reciprocal peer teaching by medical students in the gross anatomy laboratory.

Authors:  W J Hendelman; M Boss
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1986-08

9.  Peer tutoring in patient-centred interviewing skills: experience of a project for first-year students.

Authors:  Debra Nestel; Jane Kidd
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.650

10.  Effects of participation in a cross year peer tutoring programme in clinical examination skills on volunteer tutors' skills and attitudes towards teachers and teaching.

Authors:  Sharon Buckley; Javier Zamora
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 2.463

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Social studying and learning among medical students: a scoping review.

Authors:  Daniela Keren; Jocelyn Lockyer; Rachel H Ellaway
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2017-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.