Literature DB >> 24116550

General implementation of the resolution-of-the-identity and Cholesky representations of electron repulsion integrals within coupled-cluster and equation-of-motion methods: theory and benchmarks.

Evgeny Epifanovsky1, Dmitry Zuev, Xintian Feng, Kirill Khistyaev, Yihan Shao, Anna I Krylov.   

Abstract

We present a general implementation of the resolution-of-the-identity (RI) and Cholesky decomposition (CD) representations of electron repulsion integrals within the coupled-cluster with single and double substitutions (CCSD) and equation-of-motion (EOM) family of methods. The CCSD and EOM-CCSD equations are rewritten to eliminate the storage of the largest four-index intermediates leading to a significant reduction in disk storage requirements, reduced I/O penalties, and, as a result, improved parallel performance. In CCSD, the number of rate-determining contractions is also reduced; however, in EOM the number of operations is increased because the transformed integrals, which are computed once in the canonical implementation, need to be reassembled at each Davidson iteration. Nevertheless, for large jobs the effect of the increased number of rate-determining contractions is surpassed by the significantly reduced memory and disk usage leading to a considerable speed-up. Overall, for medium-size examples, RI/CD CCSD calculations are approximately 40% faster compared with the canonical implementation, whereas timings of EOM calculations are reduced by a factor of two. More significant speed-ups are obtained in larger bases, i.e., more than a two-fold speed-up for CCSD and almost five-fold speed-up for EOM-EE-CCSD in cc-pVTZ. Even more considerable speedups (6-7-fold) are achieved by combining RI/CD with the frozen natural orbitals approach. The numeric accuracy of RI/CD approaches is benchmarked with an emphasis on energy differences. Errors in EOM excitation, ionization, and electron-attachment energies are less than 0.001 eV with typical RI bases and with a 10(-4) threshold in CD. Errors with 10(-2) and 10(-3) thresholds, which afford more significant computational savings, are less than 0.04 and 0.008 eV, respectively.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24116550     DOI: 10.1063/1.4820484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  5 in total

1.  A simple scheme for calculating approximate transition moments within the equation of motion expectation value formalism.

Authors:  Achintya Kumar Dutta; Frank Neese; Róbert Izsák
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Optimization of the linear-scaling local natural orbital CCSD(T) method: Redundancy-free triples correction using Laplace transform.

Authors:  Péter R Nagy; Mihály Kállay
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Psi4 1.1: An Open-Source Electronic Structure Program Emphasizing Automation, Advanced Libraries, and Interoperability.

Authors:  Robert M Parrish; Lori A Burns; Daniel G A Smith; Andrew C Simmonett; A Eugene DePrince; Edward G Hohenstein; Uğur Bozkaya; Alexander Yu Sokolov; Roberto Di Remigio; Ryan M Richard; Jérôme F Gonthier; Andrew M James; Harley R McAlexander; Ashutosh Kumar; Masaaki Saitow; Xiao Wang; Benjamin P Pritchard; Prakash Verma; Henry F Schaefer; Konrad Patkowski; Rollin A King; Edward F Valeev; Francesco A Evangelista; Justin M Turney; T Daniel Crawford; C David Sherrill
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Accurate Reduced-Cost CCSD(T) Energies: Parallel Implementation, Benchmarks, and Large-Scale Applications.

Authors:  László Gyevi-Nagy; Mihály Kállay; Péter R Nagy
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Efficient Implementation of Equation-of-Motion Coupled-Cluster Singles and Doubles Method with the Density-Fitting Approximation: An Enhanced Algorithm for the Particle-Particle Ladder Term.

Authors:  Aslı Ünal; Uğur Bozkaya
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 6.006

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.