| Literature DB >> 24116297 |
Hyun Soo Shim1, Hyun-Jung Park, Yong Ho Ahn, Song Her, Jeong-Jun Han, Dae-Hyun Hahm, Hyejung Lee, Insop Shim.
Abstract
The present study examined the effects of krill-derived phosphatidylserine (Krill-PS) on the learning and memory function and the neural activity in rats with trimethyltin (TMT)-induced memory deficits. The rats were administered vehicle (medium-chain triglyceride: MCT) or Krill-PS (50, 100 mg/kg, p.o.) daily for 21 days. The cognitive improving efficacy of Krill-PS in TMT-induced amnesic rats was investigated by assessing the Morris water maze test and by performing choline acetyltransferase (ChAT), acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and cAMP responsive element binding protein (CREB) immunohistochemistry. The rats with TMT injection showed impaired learning and memory of the tasks and treatment with Krill-PS produced a significant improvement of the escape latency to find the platform in the Morris water maze at the 2(nd) and 4(th) day compared to that of the MCT group (p<0.05). In the retention test, the Krill-PS+MCT groups showed increased time spent around the platform compared to that of the MCT group. Consistent with the behavioral data, Krill-PS 50+MCT group significantly alleviated the loss of acetylcholinergic neurons in the hippocampus and medial septum compared to that of the MCT group. Treatment with Krill-PS significantly increased the CREB positive neurons in the hippocampal CA1 area as compared to that of the MCT group. These results suggest that Krill-PS may be useful for improving the cognitive function via regulation of cholinergic marker enzyme activity and neural activity.Entities:
Keywords: Acetylcholinesterase (AChE); Choline acetyltransferase (ChAT); Krill-derived phosphatidylserine (Krill-PS); Learning and memory; Trimethyltin (TMT); cAMP responsive element binding protein (CREB)
Year: 2012 PMID: 24116297 PMCID: PMC3792220 DOI: 10.4062/biomolther.2012.20.2.207
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomol Ther (Seoul) ISSN: 1976-9148 Impact factor: 4.634
Fig. 1.(A) The latency to escape onto the hidden platform during the Morris water maze. The task was performed with 3 trials per day during 4 days for the acquisition test. The values are presented as means ± S.E.M. ##p<0.01 and ###p<0.001 vs. Normal group; *p<0.05 vs. MCT group, respectively. (B) Retention performance was tested on 5th day. The rats received a 1 min probe trial in which the platform was removed from the pool for retention testing. The values are presented as means ± S.E.M. #p<0.05 vs. Normal group; *p<0.05 and ***p<0.001 vs. MCT group, respectively.
Fig. 2.(A) The number of choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) immunostained nuclei in different hippocampal CA1 and CA3 of the experimental groups. The values are presented as means ± S.E.M. ###p<0.001 vs. Normal group; ***p<0.001 vs. MCT group, respectively. (B) Photographs showing the distribution of ChAT-immunoreactive cells in the hippocampus of Normal group (a), MCT group (b), Krill-PS 50+MCT group (c) and Krill-PS 100+MCT group (d). Sections were cut coronally at 30 ㎛ and the scale bar represents 200 ㎛. (C) The number of choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) immunostained nuclei in the medial septum of the experimental groups. The values are presented as means ± S.E.M. #p<0.05 vs. Normal group; ***p<0.001 vs. MCT group, respectively. (D) Photographs showing the distribution of ChAT-immunoreactive cells in the medial septum of Normal group (a), MCT group (b), Krill-PS 50+MCT group (c) and Krill-PS 100+MCT group (d). Sections were cut coronally at 30 ㎛ and the scale bar represents 200 ㎛.
Fig. 3.(A) The density of acetylcholine esterase (AChE) immunostained nuclei in different hippocampal CA1 and CA3 of the experimental groups. The values are presented as means ± S.E.M. ##p<0.01 vs. Normal group; *p<0.05 and **p<0.01 vs. MCT group, respectively. (B) Photographs showing the distribution of AChE-immunoreactive cells in the hippocampus of Normal group (a), MCT group (b), Krill-PS 50+MCT group (c) and Krill-PS 100+MCT group (d). Sections were cut coronally at 30 ㎛ and the scale bar represents 500 ㎛.
Fig. 4.(A) The number of cAMP responsive element binding protein (CREB) immunostained nuclei in different hippocampal CA1 and CA3 of the experimental groups. The values are presented as means S.E.M. ##p<0.01 vs. Normal group; **p<0.01 vs. MCT group, respectively. (B) Photographs showing the distribution of CREB-immunoreactive cells in the hippocampus of Normal group (a), MCT group (b), Krill-PS 50+MCT group (c) and Krill-PS 100+MCT group (d). Sections were cut coronally at 30 ㎛ and the scale bar represents 200 ㎛.