| Literature DB >> 24116196 |
Mantang Qiu1, Lei Xu, Xin Yang, Xiangxiang Ding, Jingwen Hu, Feng Jiang, Lin Xu, Rong Yin.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A lot of studies have investigated the correlation between x-ray repair cross-complementing group 3 (XRCC3) Thr241Met polymorphism and clinical outcomes in non-small cell cancer (NSCLC), while the conclusion is still conflicting.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24116196 PMCID: PMC3792919 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Flow Diagram.
Baseline Characteristics of Eligible Studies.
| Author | Year | Country | Ethnicity | Chemotherapy | TNM Stage | Num | Age | Male |
| Butkiewicz D | 2012 | Poland | Caucasian | radiotherapy+chemotherapy | III-IV 90% | 250 | <62, 48% | 65% |
| Chen X | 2011 | China | Asian | cisplatin/carboplatin+gemcitabine/vinorelbine/paclitaxel/docetaxel | IV66.8%/III B 33.2% | 355 | 60(32–78) | 69.9% |
| de las Peñas R | 2005 | Italy | Caucasian | cisplatin+gemcitabine | III B 17%/IV83% | 135 | 62 (31–81) | 92.6% |
| Joerger M | 2011 | Netherlands | Mixed | gemcitabine+cisplatin/carboplatin | IV69%/IIIB 31% | 137 | 59.7(37–79) | 56% |
| Ke HG | 2012 | China | Asian | cisplatin/gemcitabine/docetaxel/vinorelbine/paclitaxel | /IV39.1%/III 26.6% | 460 | 59.5±3.5 | 72.6% |
| Liao WY † | 2012 | China | Asian | gemcitabine/bevacizumab+cisplatin/carboplatin/oxaliplatin | IV84%/III B 16% | 62 | 57(36–78) | 56.5% |
| Ludovini V | 2011 | Italy | Caucasian | cisplatin+gemcitabine/vinorelbine/taxol/gemcitabine alone | IV76%/III B 24% | 192 | 63(25–81) | 74.0% |
| Osawa K | 2012 | Japan | Asian | NA | III-IV 20.2% | 99 | 66.3±9.3 | 65.7% |
| Provencio M | 2012 | Spain | Caucasian | cisplatin+vinorelbine | IV83%/III B 17% | 180 | 62(39–78) | 87.2% |
| Ren S | 2011 | China | Asian | cisplatin+gemcitabine/docetaxel/vinorelbine/paclitaxel | IV67.4%/III B 32.6% | 340 | 60(30–78) | 68.2% |
| Ren SX | 2009 | Chian | Asian | cisplatin/carboplatin+gemcitabine/vinorelbine/paclitaxel | IV69.9%/IIIB30.1% | 130 | 61(30–78) | 56.9% |
| Xu C | 2011 | China | Asian | cisplatin+gemcitabine/docetaxel/vinorelbine/paclitaxel | advanced | 130 | 62(28–83) | 69.2% |
| Yin M | 2011 | China | Asian | radiotherapy+chemotherapy | III-IV 82.5% | 228 | 63(35–88) | 54.8% |
| Zhou C | 2010 | China | Asian | cisplatin+gemcitabine/vinorelbine/paclitaxel | IV69.2%/III B 30.8% | 130 | 61(30–78) | 56.9% |
Age is presented as median and range or mean±standard deviation; † data was extracted from training set.
The XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism and response to platinum-based chemotherapy.
| Allele Comparison | Homozygote Comparison | Heterozygote Comparison | Recessive Model | Dominant Model | |||||||||||
| Num | OR(95% CI) | P | Num | OR(95% CI) | P | Num | OR(95% CI) | P | Num | OR(95% CI) | P | Num | OR(95% CI) | P | |
| Overall | 5 | 1.453 (1.116–1.892)* | 0.968 | 3 | 1.983 (1.092–3.599)* | 0.868 | 5 | 1.744 (1.169–2.601)* | 0.527 | 3 | 1.390 (0.839–2.303) | 0.343 | 8 | 1.476 (1.087–2.004)* | 0.696 |
| Ethnicity | |||||||||||||||
| Asian | 2 | 1.871 (0.738–4.748) | 0.66 | NA | NA | NA | 2 | 1.953 (0.745–5.120) | 0.638 | NA | NA | NA | 5 | 1.179 (0.745–1.866) | 0.776 |
| Caucasian | 2 | 1.421 (1.028–1.964)* | 0.828 | 2 | 2.148 (1.073–4.298)* | 0.78 | 2 | 1.349 (0.807–2.254) | 0.875 | 2 | 1.751 (0.967–3.172) | 0.695 | 2 | 1.509 (0.928–2.455) | 0.803 |
| Mixed | 1 | 1.428 (0.849–2.403) | NA | 1 | 1.569 (0.483–5.098) | NA | 1 | 3.243 (1.349–7.795)* | NA | 1 | 0.755 (0.275–2.075) | NA | 1 | 2.716 (1.169–6.309)* | NA |
Allele Comparison: Met vs. Thr; Heterozygote Comparison: ThrMet vs. ThrThr; Homozygote Comparison: MetMet vs. ThrThr; Recessive Model: MetMet vs. ThrThr+ThrMet; Dominant Model: ThrMet+MetMet vs. ThrThr; P: p value for heterogeneity; Num: number of studies analyzed; NA: not available; * significant difference.
Figure 2Forest plot of the comparison of Mer vs. Thr for response to platinum-based chemotherapy.
OR = 1.453, 95% CI: 1.116–1.892, p = 0.968 for heterogeneity.
The association of XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism and survival of NSCLC.
| Heterozygote Comparison | Homozygote Comparison | Dominant Model | |||||||
| Num | HR(95% CI) | P | Num | HR(95% CI) | P | Num | HR(95% CI) | P | |
| Overall | 6 | 1.220 (0.957–1.555) | 0.056 | 4 | 0.891 (0.752–1.056) | 0.222 | 6 | 1.082 (0.929–1.261) | 0.564 |
| Ethnicity | |||||||||
| Asian | 4 | 1.077 (0.798–1.453) | 0.289 | 2 | 0.830 (0.593–1.162) | 0.485 | 5 | 1.047 (0.879–1.248) | 0.503 |
| Caucasian | 1 | 1.500 (1.309–1.719)* | NA | 1 | 0.850 (0.689–1.049) | NA | 1 | 1.200 (0.879–1.638) | NA |
| Mixed | 1 | 1.120 (0.737–1.703) | NA | 1 | 1.540 (0.871–2.723) | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Treatment | |||||||||
| Pt-Chemo | 4 | 1.155 (0.803–1.662) | 0.017 | 3 | 0.887 (0.737–1.068) | 0.112 | 3 | 0.998 (0.808–1.233) | 0.411 |
| Surgery | 1 | 1.670 (0.750–3.719) | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1 | 1.670 (0.750–3.719) | NA |
| Radio+Chemo | 1 | 1.220 (0.840–1.771) | NA | 1 | 0.910 (0.596–1.390) | NA | 2 | 1.149 (0.913–1.445) | 0.683 |
Heterozygote Comparison: ThrMet vs. ThrThr; Homozygote Comparison: MetMet vs. ThrThr; Dominant Model: ThrMet+MetMet vs. ThrThr; P: p value for heterogeneity; Pt-chemo: platinum-based chemotherapy; Num: number of studies analyzed; Radio+Chemo: radiotherapy + chemotherapy; NA: not available; * significant difference.
Figure 3Forest plot of the comparison of ThrMet+MetMet vs. ThrThr for overall survival.
HR = 1.082, 95% CI: 0.929–1.261, p = 0.564 for heterogeneity.