PURPOSE: To validate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment of aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV(MRI)) with PWV determined from invasive intra-aortic pressure measurements (PWV(INV)) and to test the reproducibility of the measurement by MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PWV(MRI) was compared with PWV(INV) in 18 nonconsecutive patients scheduled for catheterization for suspected coronary artery disease. Reproducibility of PWV(MRI) was tested in 10 healthy volunteers who underwent repeated measurement of PWV(MRI) at a single occasion. Velocity-encoded MRI was performed on all participants to assess PWV(MRI) in the total aorta (Ao(total)), the proximal aorta (Ao(prox)), and the distal aorta (Ao(dist)). RESULTS: The results are expressed as mean +/- SD, Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC), and intraclass correlation (ICC). Good agreement between PWV(MRI) and PWV(INV) was found for Ao(total) (6.5 +/- 1.1 m/s vs. 6.1 +/- 0.8 m/s; PCC = 0.53), Ao(prox) (6.5 +/- 1.3 m/s vs. 6.2 +/- 1.1 m/s; PCC = 0.69), and for Ao(dist) (6.9 +/- 1.1 m/s vs. 6.1 +/- 1.0 m/s; PCC = 0.71). Reproducibility of PWV(MRI) was high for Ao(total) (4.3 +/- 0.5 m/s vs. 4.6 +/- 0.7 m/s; ICC = 0.90, P < 0.01), Ao(prox) (4.3 +/- 0.9 m/s vs. 4.7 +/- 1.0 m/s; ICC = 0.87, P < 0.01), and Ao(dist) (4.3 +/- 0.6 m/s vs. 4.4 +/- 0.8 m/s; ICC = 0.92, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: MRI assessment of aortic pulse wave velocity shows good agreement with invasive pressure measurements and can be determined with high reproducibility.
PURPOSE: To validate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment of aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV(MRI)) with PWV determined from invasive intra-aortic pressure measurements (PWV(INV)) and to test the reproducibility of the measurement by MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PWV(MRI) was compared with PWV(INV) in 18 nonconsecutive patients scheduled for catheterization for suspected coronary artery disease. Reproducibility of PWV(MRI) was tested in 10 healthy volunteers who underwent repeated measurement of PWV(MRI) at a single occasion. Velocity-encoded MRI was performed on all participants to assess PWV(MRI) in the total aorta (Ao(total)), the proximal aorta (Ao(prox)), and the distal aorta (Ao(dist)). RESULTS: The results are expressed as mean +/- SD, Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC), and intraclass correlation (ICC). Good agreement between PWV(MRI) and PWV(INV) was found for Ao(total) (6.5 +/- 1.1 m/s vs. 6.1 +/- 0.8 m/s; PCC = 0.53), Ao(prox) (6.5 +/- 1.3 m/s vs. 6.2 +/- 1.1 m/s; PCC = 0.69), and for Ao(dist) (6.9 +/- 1.1 m/s vs. 6.1 +/- 1.0 m/s; PCC = 0.71). Reproducibility of PWV(MRI) was high for Ao(total) (4.3 +/- 0.5 m/s vs. 4.6 +/- 0.7 m/s; ICC = 0.90, P < 0.01), Ao(prox) (4.3 +/- 0.9 m/s vs. 4.7 +/- 1.0 m/s; ICC = 0.87, P < 0.01), and Ao(dist) (4.3 +/- 0.6 m/s vs. 4.4 +/- 0.8 m/s; ICC = 0.92, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: MRI assessment of aortic pulse wave velocity shows good agreement with invasive pressure measurements and can be determined with high reproducibility.
Authors: Eleanore S J Kröner; Hildo J Lamb; Hans-Marc J Siebelink; Hein Putter; Rob J van der Geest; Ernst E van der Wall; Albert de Roos; Jos J M Westenberg Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-10-30 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Yoshiaki Ohyama; Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh; Chikara Noda; Atul R Chugh; Gisela Teixido-Tura; Jang-Young Kim; Sirisha Donekal; Kihei Yoneyama; Ola Gjesdal; Alban Redheuil; Chia-Ying Liu; Tetsuya Nakamura; Colin O Wu; W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; Joao A C Lima Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: P Stefan Biesbroek; Sjoerd C Heslinga; Peter M van de Ven; Mike J L Peters; Raquel P Amier; Thelma C Konings; Christopher D Maroules; Colby Ayers; Parag H Joshi; Irene E van der Horst-Bruinsma; Vokko P van Halm; Albert C van Rossum; Michael T Nurmohamed; Robin Nijveldt Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2018-05-12 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: El-Sayed H Ibrahim; Kevin R Johnson; Alan B Miller; Jean M Shaffer; Richard D White Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2010-05-11 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Saskia G C van Elderen; A Brandts; J J M Westenberg; J van der Grond; J T Tamsma; M A van Buchem; J A Romijn; L J M Kroft; J W A Smit; A de Roos Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2009-11-14 Impact factor: 5.315