BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to report associations between p16 status, clinicopathologic characteristics, and outcomes for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP). METHODS: Specimens of squamous cell CUP were reanalyzed. Human papillomavirus (HPV) status was determined by p16 stain. A tissue microarray (TMA) was constructed to evaluate biomarkers potentially prognostic in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). RESULTS: A majority of the population (n = 26; 74%) was p16 positive (+). Prognostic factors benefiting survival were p16+ status (p < .0001), absence of macroscopic extracapsular extension (ECE; p = .004), younger age (p = .01), and higher grade (p = 0.007). The prognostic implication of worse overall survival (OS) with macroscopic ECE (p = .009) remained significant when limited to patients who were p16+ (p = .002). Exploratory TMA between unknown primary and controls suggested a biomolecular difference between squamous cell CUP and known-primary cancer. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with squamous cell CUP were p16+, indicative of HPV association. P16 staining and ECE seem to be the most prognostic features in squamous cell CUP.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to report associations between p16 status, clinicopathologic characteristics, and outcomes for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP). METHODS: Specimens of squamous cell CUP were reanalyzed. Human papillomavirus (HPV) status was determined by p16 stain. A tissue microarray (TMA) was constructed to evaluate biomarkers potentially prognostic in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). RESULTS: A majority of the population (n = 26; 74%) was p16 positive (+). Prognostic factors benefiting survival were p16+ status (p < .0001), absence of macroscopic extracapsular extension (ECE; p = .004), younger age (p = .01), and higher grade (p = 0.007). The prognostic implication of worse overall survival (OS) with macroscopic ECE (p = .009) remained significant when limited to patients who were p16+ (p = .002). Exploratory TMA between unknown primary and controls suggested a biomolecular difference between squamous cell CUP and known-primary cancer. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with squamous cell CUP were p16+, indicative of HPV association. P16 staining and ECE seem to be the most prognostic features in squamous cell CUP.
Authors: K K Ang; A Trotti; B W Brown; A S Garden; R L Foote; W H Morrison; F B Geara; D W Klotch; H Goepfert; L J Peters Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2001-11-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Michelle L Klem; James G Mechalakos; Suzanne L Wolden; Michael J Zelefsky; Bhuvanesh Singh; Dennis Kraus; Ashok Shaha; Jatin Shah; David G Pfister; Nancy Y Lee Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-11-05 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Carole Fakhry; William H Westra; Sigui Li; Anthony Cmelak; John A Ridge; Harlan Pinto; Arlene Forastiere; Maura L Gillison Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2008-02-12 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Elaine M Smith; Donghong Wang; Linda M Rubenstein; William A Morris; Lubomir P Turek; Thomas H Haugen Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Won Ki Cho; Jong-Lyel Roh; Kyung-Ja Cho; Seung-Ho Choi; Soon Yuhl Nam; Sang Yoon Kim Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2019-12-19 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Matthias Balk; Robin Rupp; Konstantinos Mantsopoulos; Matti Sievert; Magdalena Gostian; Moritz Allner; Philipp Grundtner; Markus Eckstein; Heinrich Iro; Markus Hecht; Antoniu-Oreste Gostian Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-05-10 Impact factor: 4.964