Literature DB >> 24113471

Toward patient-tailored perfusion thresholds for prediction of stroke outcome.

A Eilaghi1, C D d'Esterre, T Y Lee, R Jakubovic, J Brooks, R T-K Liu, L Zhang, R H Swartz, R I Aviv.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Multiple patient-specific clinical and radiologic parameters impact traditional perfusion thresholds used to classify/determine tissue outcome. We sought to determine whether modified baseline perfusion thresholds calculated by integrating baseline perfusion and clinical factors better predict tissue fate and clinical outcome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: CTP within 4.5 hours of acute anterior circulation stroke onset and 5- to 7-day MR imaging were performed for 203 patients with stroke, divided into derivation (n = 114) and validation (n = 89) data bases. Affected regions were operationally classified as infarct and noninfarct according to baseline CTP and follow-up FLAIR imaging. Perfusion thresholds were derived for each of the infarct and noninfarct regions, without and with transformation by baseline clinical and radiologic variables by using a general linear mixed model. Performance of transformed and nontransformed perfusion thresholds for tissue fate and 90-day clinical outcome prediction was then tested in the derivation data base. Reproducibility of models was verified by using bootstrapping and validated in an independent cohort.
RESULTS: Perfusion threshold transformation by clinical and radiologic baseline parameters significantly improved tissue fate prediction for both gray matter and white matter (P < .001). Transformed thresholds improved the 90-day outcome prediction for CBF and time-to-maximum (P < .001). Transformed relative CBF and absolute time-to-maximum values demonstrated maximal GM and WM accuracies in the derivation and validation cohorts (relative CBF GM: 91%, 86%; WM: 86%, 83%; absolute time-to-maximum 88%, 79%, and 80%, 76% respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Transformation of baseline perfusion parameters by patient-specific clinical and radiologic parameters significantly improves the accuracy of tissue fate and clinical outcome prediction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24113471      PMCID: PMC7964729          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3740

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  28 in total

1.  The iScore predicts effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Gustavo Saposnik; Jiming Fang; Moira K Kapral; Jack V Tu; Muhammad Mamdani; Peter Austin; S Claiborne Johnston
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  The impact of recanalization on ischemic stroke outcome: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joung-Ho Rha; Jeffrey L Saver
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 3.  Computed tomography and magnetic resonance perfusion imaging in ischemic stroke: definitions and thresholds.

Authors:  Krishna A Dani; Ralph G R Thomas; Francesca M Chappell; Kirsten Shuler; Mary J MacLeod; Keith W Muir; Joanna M Wardlaw
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 10.422

4.  Infarct prediction and treatment assessment with MRI-based algorithms in experimental stroke models.

Authors:  Ona Wu; Toshihisa Sumii; Minoru Asahi; Masao Sasamata; Leif Ostergaard; Bruce R Rosen; Eng H Lo; Rick M Dijkhuizen
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2006-05-10       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 5.  CT perfusion imaging in acute stroke.

Authors:  Angelos A Konstas; Max Wintermark; Michael H Lev
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.264

6.  Effects of tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke at one year. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator Stroke Study Group.

Authors:  T G Kwiatkowski; R B Libman; M Frankel; B C Tilley; L B Morgenstern; M Lu; J P Broderick; C A Lewandowski; J R Marler; S R Levine; T Brott
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-06-10       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in acute stroke.

Authors:  K J van Everdingen; J van der Grond; L J Kappelle; L M Ramos; W P Mali
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  CT perfusion mean transit time maps optimally distinguish benign oligemia from true "at-risk" ischemic penumbra, but thresholds vary by postprocessing technique.

Authors:  Shervin Kamalian; Shahmir Kamalian; A A Konstas; M B Maas; S Payabvash; S R Pomerantz; P W Schaefer; K L Furie; R G González; M H Lev
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Hyperacute extensive middle cerebral artery territory infarcts. Role of computed tomography in predicting outcome.

Authors:  Wynnie Wai-Man Lam; Thomas Wai-Hong Leung; Winnie Chiu-Wing Chu; Deacons Tai-Kong Yeung; Lawrence Ka-Sing Wong
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 10.  Gender issues in acute stroke thrombolysis.

Authors:  D A De Silva; M Ebinger; S M Davis
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 1.961

View more
  6 in total

1.  Effect of Collaterals on Clinical Presentation, Baseline Imaging, Complications, and Outcome in Acute Stroke.

Authors:  E M Fanou; J Knight; R I Aviv; S-P Hojjat; S P Symons; L Zhang; M Wintermark
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Contribution and additional impact of imaging to the SPAN-100 score.

Authors:  P Krishnan; G Saposnik; B Ovbiagele; L Zhang; S Symons; R Aviv
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  JOURNAL CLUB: Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging of Stroke Lesion With Hemodynamic and Metabolic MRI in a Rodent Model of Acute Stroke.

Authors:  Dongshuang Lu; Yinghua Jiang; Yang Ji; Iris Yuwen Zhou; Emiri Mandeville; Eng H Lo; Xiaoying Wang; Phillip Zhe Sun
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Acute Stroke Imaging Research Roadmap III Imaging Selection and Outcomes in Acute Stroke Reperfusion Clinical Trials: Consensus Recommendations and Further Research Priorities.

Authors:  Steven J Warach; Marie Luby; Gregory W Albers; Roland Bammer; Andrew Bivard; Bruce C V Campbell; Colin Derdeyn; Jeremy J Heit; Pooja Khatri; Maarten G Lansberg; David S Liebeskind; Charles B L M Majoie; Michael P Marks; Bijoy K Menon; Keith W Muir; Mark W Parsons; Achala Vagal; Albert J Yoo; Andrei V Alexandrov; Jean-Claude Baron; David J Fiorella; Anthony J Furlan; Josep Puig; Peter D Schellinger; Max Wintermark
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Final infarct volume estimation on 1-week follow-up MR imaging is feasible and is dependent on recanalization status.

Authors:  Mark Krongold; Mohammed A Almekhlafi; Andrew M Demchuk; Shelagh B Coutts; Richard Frayne; Armin Eilaghi
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 4.881

6.  Absolute Cerebral Blood Flow Infarction Threshold for 3-Hour Ischemia Time Determined with CT Perfusion and 18F-FFMZ-PET Imaging in a Porcine Model of Cerebral Ischemia.

Authors:  Eric A Wright; Christopher D d'Esterre; Laura B Morrison; Neil Cockburn; Michael Kovacs; Ting-Yim Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.