| Literature DB >> 27347877 |
Eric A Wright1,2,3, Christopher D d'Esterre4, Laura B Morrison3, Neil Cockburn3, Michael Kovacs1,3,5, Ting-Yim Lee1,2,3,5,6.
Abstract
CT Perfusion (CTP) derived cerebral blood flow (CBF) thresholds have been proposed as the optimal parameter for distinguishing the infarct core prior to reperfusion. Previous threshold-derivation studies have been limited by uncertainties introduced by infarct expansion between the acute phase of stroke and follow-up imaging, or DWI lesion reversibility. In this study a model is proposed for determining infarction CBF thresholds at 3hr ischemia time by comparing contemporaneously acquired CTP derived CBF maps to 18F-FFMZ-PET imaging, with the objective of deriving a CBF threshold for infarction after 3 hours of ischemia. Endothelin-1 (ET-1) was injected into the brain of Duroc-Cross pigs (n = 11) through a burr hole in the skull. CTP images were acquired 10 and 30 minutes post ET-1 injection and then every 30 minutes for 150 minutes. 370 MBq of 18F-FFMZ was injected ~120 minutes post ET-1 injection and PET images were acquired for 25 minutes starting ~155-180 minutes post ET-1 injection. CBF maps from each CTP acquisition were co-registered and converted into a median CBF map. The median CBF map was co-registered to blood volume maps for vessel exclusion, an average CT image for grey/white matter segmentation, and 18F-FFMZ-PET images for infarct delineation. Logistic regression and ROC analysis were performed on infarcted and non-infarcted pixel CBF values for each animal that developed infarct. Six of the eleven animals developed infarction. The mean CBF value corresponding to the optimal operating point of the ROC curves for the 6 animals was 12.6 ± 2.8 mL·min-1·100g-1 for infarction after 3 hours of ischemia. The porcine ET-1 model of cerebral ischemia is easier to implement then other large animal models of stroke, and performs similarly as long as CBF is monitored using CTP to prevent reperfusion.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27347877 PMCID: PMC4922566 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158157
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Image Analysis Method.
Infarct (pink) was identified on a PET image (top left) acquired 160-185min after ET-1 injection as pixels in the affected side ROI with signal below the infarction threshold derived from the contralateral ROI. Pixels with signal above this threshold were classified as non-infarct (yellow). The average image (top right) was used to segment out white matter. Blood vessels were identified on the BV map (bottom left) using a threshold derived from the affected side ROI (see text). Grey matter, vessel-less infarct and non-infarct ROIs were then superimposed onto the median CBF map (bottom right).
Fig 2Average Relative CBF of Infarct ROIs.
Average rCBF value from the infarct regions of the 6 animals at each time point. Error bars indicate standard error.
Fig 3Predicted Probability of Infarction vs. CBF.
Predicted probability of infarction from logistic regression plotted against CBF for each animal. The average of the CBF values that corresponded to a 75% predicted probability of infarction was approximately 4.5 ± 2.6 mL·min-1·100g-1.
Fig 4ROC Curve with Optimal Operating Point.
ROC curves plotted for each of the 6 animals. Table 1 lists the CBF threshold derived from the optimal operating point of the ROC curve for each animal, and the corresponding sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC.
ROC Parameters for Each Animal.
| Animal | Threshold (mL·min-1·100g-1) | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | Area Under Curve |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1 | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.8333 |
| 2 | 8.9 | 0.80 | 0.86 | 0.83 | 0.8908 |
| 3 | 15.0 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.7650 |
| 4 | 13.2 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.7528 |
| 5 | 12.1 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.7750 |
| 6 | 16.2 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.8110 |
The relevant parameters from the ROC analysis for each animal. The CBF threshold for infarction was the CBF value that corresponded to the optimal operating point of the ROC curve.