Jipin Das K1, Jodie Ingles1, Richard D Bagnall1, Christopher Semsarian2. 1. 1] Agnes Ginges Centre for Molecular Cardiology, Centenary Institute, Sydney, Australia [2] Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. 2. 1] Agnes Ginges Centre for Molecular Cardiology, Centenary Institute, Sydney, Australia [2] Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia [3] Department of Cardiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Major advances have been made in our understanding and clinical application of genetic testing in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Determining pathogenicity of a single-nucleotide variant remains a major clinical challenge. This study sought to reassess single-nucleotide variant classification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy probands. METHODS: Consecutive probands with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with a reported pathogenic mutation or variation of uncertain significance were included. Family and medical history were obtained. Each single-nucleotide variant was reassessed by a panel of four reviewers for pathogenicity based on established criteria together with updated cosegregation data and current population-based allele frequencies. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2012, a total of 136 unrelated hypertrophic cardiomyopathy probands had genetic testing, of which 63 (46%) carried at least one pathogenic mutation. MYBPC3 (n = 34; 47%) and MYH7 (n = 23; 32%) gene variants together accounted for 79%. Five variants in six probands (10%) were reclassified: two variation of uncertain significance were upgraded to pathogenic, one variation of uncertain significance and one pathogenic variant were downgraded to benign, and one pathogenic variant (found in two families) was downgraded to variation of uncertain significance. None of the reclassifications had any adverse clinical consequences. CONCLUSION: Given the rapid growth of genetic information available in both disease and normal populations, periodic reassessment of single-nucleotide variant data is essential in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
PURPOSE: Major advances have been made in our understanding and clinical application of genetic testing in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Determining pathogenicity of a single-nucleotide variant remains a major clinical challenge. This study sought to reassess single-nucleotide variant classification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy probands. METHODS: Consecutive probands with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with a reported pathogenic mutation or variation of uncertain significance were included. Family and medical history were obtained. Each single-nucleotide variant was reassessed by a panel of four reviewers for pathogenicity based on established criteria together with updated cosegregation data and current population-based allele frequencies. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2012, a total of 136 unrelated hypertrophic cardiomyopathy probands had genetic testing, of which 63 (46%) carried at least one pathogenic mutation. MYBPC3 (n = 34; 47%) and MYH7 (n = 23; 32%) gene variants together accounted for 79%. Five variants in six probands (10%) were reclassified: two variation of uncertain significance were upgraded to pathogenic, one variation of uncertain significance and one pathogenic variant were downgraded to benign, and one pathogenic variant (found in two families) was downgraded to variation of uncertain significance. None of the reclassifications had any adverse clinical consequences. CONCLUSION: Given the rapid growth of genetic information available in both disease and normal populations, periodic reassessment of single-nucleotide variant data is essential in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Authors: Eugene K Wong; Kirsten Bartels; Julie Hathaway; Charlotte Burns; Laura Yeates; Christopher Semsarian; Andrew D Krahn; Alice Virani; Jodie Ingles Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2019-03-21 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Arthur A M Wilde; Christopher Semsarian; Manlio F Márquez; Alireza Sepehri Shamloo; Michael J Ackerman; Euan A Ashley; Back Sternick Eduardo; Héctor Barajas-Martinez; Elijah R Behr; Connie R Bezzina; Jeroen Breckpot; Philippe Charron; Priya Chockalingam; Lia Crotti; Michael H Gollob; Steven Lubitz; Naomasa Makita; Seiko Ohno; Martín Ortiz-Genga; Luciana Sacilotto; Eric Schulze-Bahr; Wataru Shimizu; Nona Sotoodehnia; Rafik Tadros; James S Ware; David S Winlaw; Elizabeth S Kaufman; Takeshi Aiba; Andreas Bollmann; Jong-Il Choi; Aarti Dalal; Francisco Darrieux; John Giudicessi; Mariana Guerchicoff; Kui Hong; Andrew D Krahn; Ciorsti Mac Intyre; Judith A Mackall; Lluís Mont; Carlo Napolitano; Pablo Ochoa Juan; Petr Peichl; Alexandre C Pereira; Peter J Schwartz; Jon Skinner; Christoph Stellbrink; Jacob Tfelt-Hansen; Thomas Deneke Journal: J Arrhythm Date: 2022-05-31
Authors: Martin K Stiles; Arthur A M Wilde; Dominic J Abrams; Michael J Ackerman; Christine M Albert; Elijah R Behr; Sumeet S Chugh; Martina C Cornel; Karen Gardner; Jodie Ingles; Cynthia A James; Jyh-Ming Jimmy Juang; Stefan Kääb; Elizabeth S Kaufman; Andrew D Krahn; Steven A Lubitz; Heather MacLeod; Carlos A Morillo; Koonlawee Nademanee; Vincent Probst; Elizabeth V Saarel; Luciana Sacilotto; Christopher Semsarian; Mary N Sheppard; Wataru Shimizu; Jonathan R Skinner; Jacob Tfelt-Hansen; Dao Wu Wang Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2020-10-19 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Martin K Stiles; Arthur A M Wilde; Dominic J Abrams; Michael J Ackerman; Christine M Albert; Elijah R Behr; Sumeet S Chugh; Martina C Cornel; Karen Gardner; Jodie Ingles; Cynthia A James; Jyh-Ming Jimmy Juang; Stefan Kääb; Elizabeth S Kaufman; Andrew D Krahn; Steven A Lubitz; Heather MacLeod; Carlos A Morillo; Koonlawee Nademanee; Vincent Probst; Elizabeth V Saarel; Luciana Sacilotto; Christopher Semsarian; Mary N Sheppard; Wataru Shimizu; Jonathan R Skinner; Jacob Tfelt-Hansen; Dao Wu Wang Journal: J Arrhythm Date: 2021-04-08
Authors: Austin Bland; Elizabeth A Harrington; Kyla Dunn; Mitchel Pariani; Julia C K Platt; Megan E Grove; Colleen Caleshu Journal: Genet Med Date: 2017-12-14 Impact factor: 8.822