Literature DB >> 24112935

Transcranial stimulation and cognition.

Carlo Miniussi1, Manuela Ruzzoli.   

Abstract

Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is a unique method for studying cognitive function. For the study of cognition, NIBS has gained popularity as a complementary method to functional neuroimaging. By bypassing the correlative approaches of standard imaging techniques, it is possible to establish a putative relationship between brain cognition. In fact, functional neuroimaging data cannot demonstrate the actual role of a particular cortical activation in a specific function because an activated area may simply be correlated with task performance, rather than being responsible for it. NIBS can induce a temporary modification of performance only if the stimulated area is causally engaged in the task. In analogy with lesion studies, NIBS can provide information about where and when a particular process occurs. Based on this assumption, NIBS has been used in many different cognitive domains. However, one of the most interesting questions in neuroscience may not be where and when, but how cognitive activity occurs. Beyond localization approaches, NIBS can be employed to study brain mechanisms. NIBS techniques have the potential to influence behavior transiently by altering neuronal activity, which may have facilitatory or inhibitory behavioral effects. NIBS techniques include transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial electrical stimulation (tES). TMS has been shown transiently to modulate neural excitability in a manner that is dependent mainly on the timing and frequency of stimulation (high versus low). The mechanism underlying tES is a change in neuronal membrane potentials that appears to be dependent mainly on the direction of current flow (anodal versus cathodal). Nevertheless, the final effects induced by TMS or tES depend on many technical parameters used during stimulation, such as the intensity of stimulation, coil orientation, site of the reference electrode, and time of application. Moreover, an important factor is the possible interactions between these factors and the physiological and cognitive state of the subject. To use NIBS in cognition, it is important to understand not only how NIBS functions but also the brain mechanisms being studied and the features of the area of interest. To describe better the advanced knowledge provided by NIBS in cognition, we will treat each NIBS technique separately and underline the related hypotheses beyond applications.
© 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NIBS and cognition; behavior; cognitive neuroscience; entrainment; neural noise; pedestal effect; rTMS; state dependency; stochastic resonance; tDCS

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24112935     DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53497-2.00056-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol        ISSN: 0072-9752


  22 in total

1.  Boosting Learning Efficacy with Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Intact and Brain-Damaged Humans.

Authors:  Florian Herpich; Michael D Melnick; Sara Agosta; Krystel R Huxlin; Duje Tadin; Lorella Battelli
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Double dissociation of working memory and attentional processes in smokers and non-smokers with and without nicotine.

Authors:  Jessica Grundey; Rosa Amu; Géza Gergely Ambrus; Georgi Batsikadze; Walter Paulus; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Transcranial electric stimulation as a neural interface to gain insight on human brain functions: current knowledge and future perspective.

Authors:  Giulia Galli; Carlo Miniussi; Maria Concetta Pellicciari
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 4.  Current and potential utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the diagnostics before brain tumor surgery.

Authors:  Thomas Picht
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2014-07

Review 5.  [Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for preoperative mapping of the eloquent cortex].

Authors:  T Picht
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.214

6.  Tolerability of Repeated Application of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation with Limited Outputs to Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Bhaskar Paneri; Devin Adair; Chris Thomas; Niranjan Khadka; Vaishali Patel; William J Tyler; Lucas Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  Modulating brain oscillations to drive brain function.

Authors:  Gregor Thut
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 8.  Transcranial Alternating Current and Random Noise Stimulation: Possible Mechanisms.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Christoph S Herrmann
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 3.599

9.  The effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in obese females with binge eating disorder: a protocol for a double-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial.

Authors:  Mara Fernandes Maranhão; Nara Mendes Estella; Maria Elisa Gisbert Cury; Veruska Lastoria Amigo; Clarissa Mollinero Picasso; Arthur Berberian; Iain Campbell; Ulrike Schmidt; Angélica Medeiros Claudino
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.630

10.  Toward unraveling reading-related modulations of tDCS-induced neuroplasticity in the human visual cortex.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Géza Gergely Ambrus; Leila Chaieb
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.