Cody J Wenthur1, Patrick R Gentry, Thomas P Mathews, Craig W Lindsley. 1. Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt Center for Neuroscience Drug Discovery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-6600; email: craig.lindsley@vanderbilt.edu.
Abstract
The presence of druggable, topographically distinct allosteric sites on a wide range of receptor families has offered new paradigms for small molecules to modulate receptor function. Moreover, ligands that target allosteric sites offer significant advantages over the corresponding orthosteric ligands in terms of selectivity, including subtype selectivity within receptor families, and can also impart improved physicochemical properties. However, allosteric ligands are not a panacea. Many chemical issues (e.g., flat structure-activity relationships) and pharmacological issues (e.g., ligand-biased signaling) that are allosteric centric have emerged. Notably, the fact that allosteric sites are less evolutionarily conserved leads to improved selectivity; however, this can also lead to species differences that can hinder safety assessment. Many allosteric ligands possess molecular switches, wherein a small structural change (chemical or metabolic) can modulate the mode of pharmacology or receptor subtype selectivity. As the field has matured, as described here, key principles and strategies have emerged for the design of ligands/drugs for allosteric sites.
The presence of druggable, topographically distinct allosteric sites on a wide range of receptor families has offered new paradigms for small molecules to modulate receptor function. Moreover, ligands that target allosteric sites offer significant advantages over the corresponding orthosteric ligands in terms of selectivity, including subtype selectivity within receptor families, and can also impart improved physicochemical properties. However, allosteric ligands are not a panacea. Many chemical issues (e.g., flat structure-activity relationships) and pharmacological issues (e.g., ligand-biased signaling) that are allosteric centric have emerged. Notpan class="Gene">ably, the fact that allosteric sites are less evolutionarily conserved leads to improved selectivity; however, this can also lead to species differences that can hinder safety assessment. Many allosteric ligands possess molecular switches, wherein a small structural change (chemical or metabolic) can modulate the mode of pharmacology or receptor subtype selectivity. As the field has matured, as described here, key principles and strategies have emerged for the design of ligands/drugs for allosteric sites.
Authors: Daniel T Monaghan; Mark W Irvine; Blaise Mathias Costa; Guangyu Fang; David E Jane Journal: Neurochem Int Date: 2012-01-17 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Katrien Busschots; Laura A Lopez-Garcia; Carmen Lammi; Adriana Stroba; Stefan Zeuzem; Albrecht Piiper; Pedro M Alzari; Sonja Neimanis; Jose M Arencibia; Matthias Engel; Jörg O Schulze; Ricardo M Biondi Journal: Chem Biol Date: 2012-09-21
Authors: Douglas J Sheffler; Cody J Wenthur; Joshua A Bruner; Sheridan J S Carrington; Paige N Vinson; Kiran K Gogi; Anna L Blobaum; Ryan D Morrison; Mitchell Vamos; Nicholas D P Cosford; Shaun R Stauffer; J Scott Daniels; Colleen M Niswender; P Jeffrey Conn; Craig W Lindsley Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2012-04-30 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Craig W Lindsley; Zhijian Zhao; William H Leister; Ronald G Robinson; Stanley F Barnett; Deborah Defeo-Jones; Raymond E Jones; George D Hartman; Joel R Huff; Hans E Huber; Mark E Duggan Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2005-02-01 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Mu-Fa Zou; Jianjing Cao; Alice L Rodriguez; P Jeffrey Conn; Amy Hauck Newman Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2010-12-28 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Robert Lavieri; Sarah A Scott; Jana A Lewis; Paige E Selvy; Michelle D Armstrong; H Alex Brown; Craig W Lindsley Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2009-03-06 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Pedro M Garcia-Barrantes; Hyekyung P Cho; Colleen M Niswender; Frank W Byers; Charles W Locuson; Anna L Blobaum; Zixiu Xiang; Jerri M Rook; P Jeffrey Conn; Craig W Lindsley Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2015-10-08 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Craig W Lindsley; Kyle A Emmitte; Corey R Hopkins; Thomas M Bridges; Karen J Gregory; Colleen M Niswender; P Jeffrey Conn Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2016-02-16 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: Stuart L Schreiber; Joanne D Kotz; Min Li; Jeffrey Aubé; Christopher P Austin; John C Reed; Hugh Rosen; E Lucile White; Larry A Sklar; Craig W Lindsley; Benjamin R Alexander; Joshua A Bittker; Paul A Clemons; Andrea de Souza; Michael A Foley; Michelle Palmer; Alykhan F Shamji; Mathias J Wawer; Owen McManus; Meng Wu; Beiyan Zou; Haibo Yu; Jennifer E Golden; Frank J Schoenen; Anton Simeonov; Ajit Jadhav; Michael R Jackson; Anthony B Pinkerton; Thomas D Y Chung; Patrick R Griffin; Benjamin F Cravatt; Peter S Hodder; William R Roush; Edward Roberts; Dong-Hoon Chung; Colleen B Jonsson; James W Noah; William E Severson; Subramaniam Ananthan; Bruce Edwards; Tudor I Oprea; P Jeffrey Conn; Corey R Hopkins; Michael R Wood; Shaun R Stauffer; Kyle A Emmitte Journal: Cell Date: 2015-06-04 Impact factor: 41.582