| Literature DB >> 24109493 |
Hector W H Tsang1, Janet L C Lee, Doreen W H Au, Karen K W Wong, K W Lai.
Abstract
Eight-Section Brocades and Yijin Jing consist of some routine movements that are too difficult for frail elders. A novel health qigong protocol was developed and its effectiveness for frail elders was examined using a randomized clinical trial (RCT). An expert panel performed functional anatomy analysis and safety field test prior to the RCT. The experimental group (n = 61, 83 ± 6 yr) was given a 12-week qigong exercise program, while the comparison group (n = 55, 84 ± 6 yr) participated in a newspaper reading program with the same duration and frequency. Pre-, mid-, post-, and follow-up assessments were conducted. At 12 weeks, the qigong group had significant improvements in thinking operations (F = 4.05, P = .02) and significant reduction of resting heart rate (F = 3.14, P = .045) as compared to the newspaper reading group. A trend of improvements in grip strength and a decreasing trend of depression levels were observed among the qigong group. Significant perceived improvements in physical health (F = 13.01, P = .001), activities of daily living (F = 5.32, P = .03), and overall health status (F = 15.26, P = .0001) were found. There are improvements in some aspects of psychosocial, cognitive, physical, and physiological domains. Clinical applications and possibilities for further research are discussed.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24109493 PMCID: PMC3784263 DOI: 10.1155/2013/827392
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Yan Chai Yi Jin Ten Section Brocades protocol.
| New protocol content | Established qigong protocol reference |
|---|---|
| Routine 1: Wei Tuo presents a Club 1 | Yi Jin Jing |
| Routine 2: Wei Tuo presents a Club 2 | Yi Jin Jing |
| Routine 3: prop up the sky with both hands to regulate the triple warmer | Eight-Section Brocades |
| Routine 4: look back to treat five strains and seven impairments | Eight-Section Brocades |
| Routine 5: show claws and flash wings | Yi Jin Jing |
| Routine 6: pull toes with both hands to reinforce kidney and waist | Eight-Section Brocades |
| Routine 7: three plates drop to the ground | Yi Jin Jing |
| Routine 8: Clench fists and look with eyes wide open to build up strength and stamina | Eight-Section Brocades |
| Routine 9: green dragon extends claws | Yi Jin Jing |
| Routine 10: rise and fall on tiptoes to dispel all diseases | Eight-Section Brocades |
Content validation ratios (CVRs) for potential therapeutic value of the Yan Chai Yi Jing Ten Section Brocades among six experts.
| On therapeutic values: the Yan Chai Yi Jing Ten-Section Brocades protocol | CVR | |
|---|---|---|
| Standing | Sitting | |
|
| ||
| Facilitates relaxation | 1.00* | 1.00* |
| Relieves unpleasant feeling | 1.00* | 1.00* |
| Develops confidence to deal with disabilities and medical conditions | 0.50 | 0.67 |
| Culturally relevant activity and arouses interest | 1.00* | 1.00* |
| Promotes social contact | 0.83* | 0.83* |
|
| ||
| Enforces “deep and slow” breathing | 1.00* | 1.00* |
| Enforces coordination between respiration and movements | 1.00* | 1.00* |
| Enforces trunk, neck and upper limbs stretch | 0.83* | 0.83* |
| Promotes functional mobility and balance | 1.00* | 0.67 |
| Movements can be easily picked up by elders | 0.50 | 0.50 |
| Easy to learn as routine exercise | 0.83* | 0.83* |
|
| ||
| From TCM perspective, it promotes good health through practice of reciprocal movements | 1.00* | 1.00* |
| From TCM perspective, it stimulates acupressure points and enforces the flow of “Qi” | 0.67 | 0.67 |
| Promotes physical and psychological health | 1.00* | 1.00* |
|
| ||
| Can be adapted to activity tolerance of each individual | 0.83* | 0.83* |
| Can be practiced in old age home | 0.83* | 0.83* |
| Adequate precautions to prevent potential harm | 1.00* | 1.00* |
*Indicating statements with consensus agreement among the experts, that is, CVR within 0.75–1.00.
Figure 2Consort flow diagram.
Figure 1Yan Chai Yi Jin Ten-Section Brocade with selected illustrations for standing and sitting positions.
Demographic characteristics of experimental and comparison groups.
| Demographic (score range) | Mean (SD) or count (%) |
| df |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental ( | Control ( | ||||
| Age | 83.33 (6.30) | 84.85 (6.03) |
| 112 | 0.19 |
| MMSE score | 23.69 (3.52) | 23.58 (3.61) |
| 114 | 0.87 |
| CAPE score | 9.21 (2.08) | 9 (1.98) |
| 114 | 0.57 |
| GDS score | 4.07 (3.11) | 4.36 (3.26) |
| 114 | 0.61 |
| Frailty index | 17.75 (6.03) | 19.85 (5.43) |
| 114 | 0.052 |
| Center |
| 1 | 0.61 | ||
| Residential care homes | 51 (83.6%) | 44 (80%) | |||
| Day care center | 10 (16.4%) | 11 (20%) | |||
| Gender |
| 1 | 0.61 | ||
| Male | 14 (23%) | 15 (27.3%) | |||
| Female | 47 (77%) | 40 (72.7%) | |||
| Marital status |
| 2 | 0.66 | ||
| Single | 3 (4.9%) | 5 (9.1%) | |||
| Widowed | 42 (68.9%) | 35 (63.6%) | |||
| Married, spouse alive | 16 (26.2%) | 14 (25.5%) | |||
| Education level |
| 2 | 0.53 | ||
| No school completed | 15 (24.6%) | 17 (30.9%) | |||
| Primary | 38 (62.3%) | 28 (50.9%) | |||
| Secondary | 8 (13.1%) | 9 (16.4%) | |||
| Walking ability |
| 4 | 0.93 | ||
| Walk independently | 10 (16.4%) | 10 (18.2%) | |||
| Walk with stick | 19 (31.1%) | 15 (27.3%) | |||
| Walk with frame | 7 (11.5%) | 4 (7.3%) | |||
| Walk with rollator | 7 (11.5%) | 7 (12.7%) | |||
| Wheelchair bounded | 18 (29.5%) | 18 (32.7%) | |||
Notes: MMSE: Mini-Mental State Examination; CAPE: Clifton Assessment Procedures for the Elderly; GDS: Geriatric Depression Scale.
Acute intervention effects on psychosocial measures.
| Outcome | Means and SDs (in brackets) | Repeated measures ANOVA | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Score range) | Pre-Ax | Mid-Ax | Post-Ax | (Group by time interaction) | (Time interaction) | |||||||
| Exp | Com | Exp | Com | Exp | Com |
| df |
|
| Power | ||
| GDS (0–15) | 4.07 | 4.36 | 4.61 | 4.24 | 4.31 | 4.76 | 1.16 | 2,228 | 0.32 | — | 0.01 | 0.25 |
| (Exp: | (3.11) | (3.26) | (2.91) | (3.23) | (3.33) | (3.52) | ||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| Physical health | — | — | 17.09 | — | 18.05 | — | 13.01 | 1,54 | — | 0.001** | 0.19 | 0.94 |
| (Exp: | (1.97) | (2.37) | ||||||||||
| Activities of daily living | — | — | 12.98 | — | 13.48 | — | 5.32 | 1,43 | — | 0.026* | 0.11 | 0.62 |
| (Exp: | (1.58) | (1.69) | ||||||||||
| Psychological | — | — | 25.22 | — | 25.36 | — | 0.05 | 1,57 | — | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.06 |
| (Exp: | (4.49) | (3.08) | ||||||||||
| Social relationship | — | — | 9.84 | — | 9.91 | — | 0.32 | 1,57 | — | 0.58 | 0.01 | 0.09 |
| (Exp: | (1.09) | (1.05) | ||||||||||
| Overall health status | — | — | 6.95 | — | 7.43 | — | 15.26 | 1,57 | — | 0.0001*** | 0.21 | 0.97 |
| (Exp: | (1.08) | (1.22) | ||||||||||
Notes: Com: comparison group; Exp: experimental group; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. GDS: Geriatric Depression Scale; only experimental group is required to complete the 21-item Perceived Benefit Questionnaire.
Acute intervention effects on cognitive measures.
| Outcome | Means and SDs (in brackets) | Repeated measures ANOVA (group by time interaction) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Score range) | Pre-Ax | Mid-Ax | Post-Ax | ||||||||
| Exp | Com | Exp | Com | Exp | Com |
| df |
|
| Power | |
| LOTCA-G | |||||||||||
| (Exp: | |||||||||||
| Orientation (0–16) | 14.13 | 13.87 | 14.31 | 13.91 | 14.11 | 13.38 | 0.94 | 1.9,216.10 | 0.39 | 0.01 | 0.21 |
| (1.98) | (2.10) | (2.15) | (1.86) | (1.73) | (2.19) | ||||||
| Perception (0–28) | 25.87 | 25.76 | 25.67 | 25.49 | 26.20 | 25.91 | 0.13 | 2,228 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 0.07 |
| (2.00) | (2.34) | (2.07) | (2.40) | (2.00) | (2.44) | ||||||
| Praxis (0–12) | 9.57 | 9.75 | 9.23 | 9.35 | 9.54 | 9.64 | 0.04 | 2,228 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 0.06 |
| (1.28) | (1.06) | (1.04) | (1.27) | (1.15) | (1.32) | ||||||
| Visuomotor organization (0–24) | 16.75 | 17.45 | 16.59 | 16.87 | 16.90 | 16.78 | 1.58 | 2,228 | 0.21 | 0.01 | 0.33 |
| (3.58) | (4.03) | (3.34) | (3.62) | (3.65) | (4.35) | ||||||
| Thinking operations (0–8) | 4.41 | 4.56 | 4.49 | 4.22 | 4.79 | 4.22 | 4.05 | 2,228 | 0.02* | 0.03 | 0.72 |
| (1.80) | (1.69) | (1.84) | (1.64) | (1.83) | (1.70) | ||||||
| Memory (12) | 10.54 | 10.15 | 10.52 | 10.55 | 10.89 | 10.84 | 0.96 | 2,228 | 0.39 | 0.01 | 0.22 |
| (1.48) | (1.88) | (1.97) | (2.18) | (1.83) | (1.57) | ||||||
| Attention (4) | 3.84 | 3.76 | 3.77 | 3.87 | 3.74 | 3.73 | 1.26 | 2,228 | 0.29 | 0.01 | 0.27 |
| (0.45) | (0.47) | (0.59) | (0.43) | (0.48) | (0.49) | ||||||
Notes: Com: comparison group; Exp: experimental group; *P < 0.05.
LOTCA-G: Lowenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment-Geriatric.
Acute intervention effects on physical and physiological measures.
| Outcome | Means and SDs (in brackets) | Repeated measures ANOVA (group by time interaction) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Score range) | Pre-Ax | Mid-Ax | Post-Ax | ||||||||
| Exp | Com | Exp | Com | Exp | Com |
| df |
|
| Power | |
| Right handgrip strength | 16.79 | 15.37 | 16.50 | 14.63 | 17.03 | 15.00 | 0.51 | 1.72,188.93 | 0.58 | 0.01 | 0.13 |
| (Exp: | (6.24) | (5.70) | (6.59) | (4.93) | (6.74) | (5.18) | |||||
| Left handgrip strength | 13.70 | 13.90 | 14.02 | 13.63 | 14.24 | 14.24 | 0.36 | 2,206 | 0.70 | 0.004 | 0.11 |
| (Exp: | (5.57) | (5.46) | (5.23) | (4.74) | (5.76) | (4.64) | |||||
| Timed Up & Go | 23.28 | 21.91 | 22.33 | 21.55 | 22.18 | 22.17 | 0.54 | 1.59,119.13 | 0.54 | 0.01 | 0.13 |
| (Exp: | (12.75) | (13.05) | (11.91) | (12.12) | (12.71) | (11.72) | |||||
| Systolic blood pressure | 143.78 | 148.42 | 138.03 | 147.28 | 136.20 | 139.78 | 1.54 | 2,228 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 0.33 |
| (Exp: | (22.20) | (18.45) | (20.04) | (18.74) | (20.94) | (16.72) | |||||
| Diastolic blood pressure | 76.55 | 80.13 | 74.03 | 77.62 | 72.82 | 75.52 | 0.12 | 1.89,215.53 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 0.07 |
| (Exp: | (13.59) | (12.54) | (10.68) | (11.11) | (11.21) | (10.11) | |||||
| Resting heart rate | 76.39 | 75.07 | 75.47 | 73.95 | 73.51 | 75.04 | 3.14 | 2,228 | 0.045* | 0.03 | 0.60 |
| (Exp: | (14.80) | (9.47) | (14.45) | (9.26) | (13.00) | (10.93) | |||||
| Forced vital capacity (max) | 1.80 | 1.40 | — | — | 1.64 | 1.38 | 0.79 | 1,54 | 0.38 | 0.01 | 0.14 |
| (Exp: | (0.62) | (0.45) | (0.62) | (0.47) | |||||||
| Forced expiratory volume in 1s | 1.12 | 0.91 | — | — | 1.10 | 1.04 | 2.75 | 1,54 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.37 |
| (Exp: | (0.38) | (0.36) | (0.39) | (0.37) | |||||||
| Forced expiratory volume in 1s % | 64.61 | 65.93 | — | — | 70.40 | 76.00 | 0.86 | 1,54 | 0.36 | 0.02 | 0.15 |
| (Exp: | (19.34) | (19.39) | (18.16) | (12.44) | |||||||
Notes: Com: comparison group; Exp: experimental group; *P < 0.05.