OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of home visiting programmes that offer health promotion and preventive care to older people. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of 15 studies of home visiting. PARTICIPANTS: older people living at home, including frail older people at risk of adverse outcomes. OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality, admission to hospital, admission to institutional care, functional status, health status. RESULTS: Home visiting was associated with a significant reduction in mortality. The pooled odds ratio for eight studies that assessed mortality in members of the general elderly population was 0.76 (95% confidence interval 0.64 to 0.89). Five studies of home visiting to frail older people who were at risk of adverse outcomes also showed a significant reduction in mortality (0.72; 0.54 to 0.97). Home visiting was associated with a significant reduction in admissions to long term institutional care in members of the general elderly population (0.65; 0.46 to 0.91). For three studies of home visiting to frail, "at risk" older people, the pooled odds ratio was 0.55 (0.35 to 0.88). Meta-analysis of six studies of home visiting to members of the general elderly population showed no significant reduction in admissions to hospital (odds ratio 0.95; 0.80 to 1.09). Three studies showed no significant effect on health (standardised effect size 0.06; -0.07 to 0.18). Four studies showed no effect on activities of daily living (0.05; -0.07 to 0.17). CONCLUSION: Home visits to older people can reduce mortality and admission to long term institutional care.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of home visiting programmes that offer health promotion and preventive care to older people. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of 15 studies of home visiting. PARTICIPANTS: older people living at home, including frail older people at risk of adverse outcomes. OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality, admission to hospital, admission to institutional care, functional status, health status. RESULTS: Home visiting was associated with a significant reduction in mortality. The pooled odds ratio for eight studies that assessed mortality in members of the general elderly population was 0.76 (95% confidence interval 0.64 to 0.89). Five studies of home visiting to frail older people who were at risk of adverse outcomes also showed a significant reduction in mortality (0.72; 0.54 to 0.97). Home visiting was associated with a significant reduction in admissions to long term institutional care in members of the general elderly population (0.65; 0.46 to 0.91). For three studies of home visiting to frail, "at risk" older people, the pooled odds ratio was 0.55 (0.35 to 0.88). Meta-analysis of six studies of home visiting to members of the general elderly population showed no significant reduction in admissions to hospital (odds ratio 0.95; 0.80 to 1.09). Three studies showed no significant effect on health (standardised effect size 0.06; -0.07 to 0.18). Four studies showed no effect on activities of daily living (0.05; -0.07 to 0.17). CONCLUSION: Home visits to older people can reduce mortality and admission to long term institutional care.
Authors: E H Wagner; A Z LaCroix; L Grothaus; S G Leveille; J A Hecht; K Artz; K Odle; D M Buchner Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 1994-11 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: M E Tinetti; D I Baker; G McAvay; E B Claus; P Garrett; M Gottschalk; M L Koch; K Trainor; R I Horwitz Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1994-09-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Marilyn J Rantz; Rosemary T Porter; Debra Cheshier; Donna Otto; Charles H Servey; Rebecca A Johnson; Myra Aud; Marjorie Skubic; Harry Tyrer; Zhihai He; George Demiris; Gregory L Alexander; Gene Taylor Journal: J Hous Elderly Date: 2008
Authors: Ans Bouman; Erik van Rossum; Patricia Nelemans; Gertrudis Ijm Kempen; Paul Knipschild Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2008-04-03 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Laura N Gitlin; Walter W Hauck; Marie P Dennis; Laraine Winter; Nancy Hodgson; Sandy Schinfeld Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2009-01-23 Impact factor: 5.562