| Literature DB >> 24109492 |
Cristiana da Purificação Pinto1, Velize Dias Rodrigues, Fernanda da Purificação Pinto, Renata da Purificação Pinto, Ana Paula Trovatti Uetanabaro, Carla Santos Ribeiro Pinheiro, Suzana Ferreira Magalhães Gadea, Tânia Regina Dos Santos Silva, Angélica Maria Lucchese.
Abstract
Lippia origanoides Kunth, Lippia alnifolia Schauer, and Lippia thymoides Martius and Schauer are shrubs used in the traditional Brazilian medicine as antiseptics, as well as in the treatment of infectious diseases. This study was designed to investigate the antibacterial and antifungal activities of the methanolic extracts of these species, as new potential sources of antimicrobial drugs. The antimicrobial activity of methanolic extracts was investigated against resistant yeasts and bacteria by agar disk diffusion. Then, the MIC determination of the most active species and its fractions in hexane, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, and water was performed. By the agar diffusion assay, all species were active against at least two microorganisms, giving evidence to support their use in the popular medicine. L. origanoides leaves exhibited the widest antimicrobial action, inhibiting the growth of two Gram-positive bacteria and two yeasts; this activity was also confirmed by the MIC evaluation. The fractionation of L. origanoides crude extracts improved the activity in spectrum and intensity. The results obtained in this study indicate that L. origanoides may be a promising alternative in the treatment of bacterial and fungal infections and in the seeking of new antimicrobial drugs.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24109492 PMCID: PMC3784154 DOI: 10.1155/2013/614501
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Antimicrobial activity by disk diffusion method of crude extracts from L. origanoides, L. alnifolia, L. thymoides, and reference antibiotics.
| Samples | Inhibition zones ± (mm)1 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| R | 10.2 ± 1.3 | 10 ± 0.5 | R | R | R |
|
| R | 12.3 ± 1.0 | 13.9 ± 0.8 | R | R | R |
|
| R | 8.4 ± 0.9 | R | R | R | 6.9 ± 0.1 |
|
| ||||||
|
| R | 13.0 ± 0.5 | 12.0 ± 0.9 | R | 11.7 ± 0.4 | 7.1 ± 0.4 |
|
| R | R | R | R | R | R |
|
| ||||||
|
| R | 11.2 ± 1.0 | 9.7 ± 1.3 | R | R | R |
|
| R | 8.7 ± 0.6 | R | R | R | R |
|
| R | 8.5 ± 1.5 | R | R | R | R |
|
| ||||||
| Cloramphenicol2 | 15.8 ± 1.7 | 22.6 ± 2.2 | R | 8.5 ± 0.9 | — | — |
|
| ||||||
| Nystatin3 | — | — | — | — | 17.5 ± 0.9 | 16.6 ± 0.9 |
1Inhibition zones including the diameter disk (6 mm); 2cloramphenicol at 30 μg/disk; 3nystatin at 10 μg/disk; R: resistant; (—): Not evaluated.
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the crude extract and fractions from L. origanoides and reference antibiotics.
| Samples | Minimum inhibitory concentration (mg·mL−1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||||
| CEXL | 5.263 | 1.316 | 0.658 | 5.263 | 2.631 | 2.631 |
| HEFL | 1.316 | — | 0.329 | — | 2.631 | — |
| DIFL | 0.658 | — | 2.631 | — | 1.316 | — |
| EAFL | 0.658 | — | 0.329 | — | 2.631 | — |
| AQFL | 2.631 | — | 2.631 | — | 2.631 | — |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| CEXS | 5.263 | 5.263 | 2.631 | 5.263 | 2.631 | 5.263 |
| HEFS | 2.631 | — | 0.658 | — | 2.631 | — |
| DIFS | 0.658 | — | 2.631 | — | 0.658 | — |
| EAFS | 1.316 | — | 2.631 | — | 2.631 | — |
| AQFS | 5.263 | — | 5.263 | — | 2.631 | — |
|
| ||||||
| Chloramphenicol | 10 | 0.078 | 0.313 | 5 | — | — |
|
| ||||||
| Nystatin | — | — | — | — | 1.25 | 2.5 |
(—): not evaluated; CEX: crude extract; HEF: hexane fraction; DIF: dichloromethane fraction; EAF: ethyl acetate fraction; AQF: aqueous fraction; L: leaves; S: stems. MIC = 2.631 mg·mL−1 was the maximum value considered for attribution of antimicrobial activity for each strain.
Phytochemical screening results of the fractions of L. origanoides stems and leaves.
| Reagent | AS | DRG | LB | KOH | NP/PEG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metabolites | Terpenes and steroids | Alkaloids | Triterpenes and steroids | Coumarins and anthraquinones | Flavonoids and | Saponins |
|
| ||||||
| HEFL |
| − |
| + |
| − |
| DIFL |
| − |
| + |
| − |
| EAFL |
| − |
| − |
| + |
| AQFL |
| − |
| − |
| + |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| HEFS |
| − |
| + | − | − |
| DIFS |
| − |
| − |
| − |
| EAFS |
| − |
| − |
| + |
| AQFS | + | − | + | − |
| + |
AS: anisaldehyde sulfuric acid reagent; DRG: Dragendorff reagent; LB: Liebermann-Burchard reagent; KOH: potassium hydroxide reagent; NP/PEG: natural products/polyethylene glycol reagent; CEX: crude extract; HEF: hexane fraction; DIF: dichloromethane fraction; EAF: ethyl acetate fraction; AQF: aqueous fraction; L: leaves; S: stems; (−): not detectable; (+): present; (++): highly present.