Literature DB >> 24108515

Effects of fluid resuscitation with colloids vs crystalloids on mortality in critically ill patients presenting with hypovolemic shock: the CRISTAL randomized trial.

Djillali Annane1, Shidasp Siami, Samir Jaber, Claude Martin, Souheil Elatrous, Adrien Descorps Declère, Jean Charles Preiser, Hervé Outin, Gilles Troché, Claire Charpentier, Jean Louis Trouillet, Antoine Kimmoun, Xavier Forceville, Michael Darmon, Olivier Lesur, Jean Reignier, Jean Régnier, Fékri Abroug, Philippe Berger, Christophe Clec'h, Christophe Cle'h, Joël Cousson, Laure Thibault, Sylvie Chevret.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Evidence supporting the choice of intravenous colloid vs crystalloid solutions for management of hypovolemic shock remains unclear.
OBJECTIVE: To test whether use of colloids compared with crystalloids for fluid resuscitation alters mortality in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with hypovolemic shock. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A multicenter, randomized clinical trial stratified by case mix (sepsis, trauma, or hypovolemic shock without sepsis or trauma). Therapy in the Colloids Versus Crystalloids for the Resuscitation of the Critically Ill (CRISTAL) trial was open label but outcome assessment was blinded to treatment assignment. Recruitment began in February 2003 and ended in August 2012 of 2857 sequential ICU patients treated at 57 ICUs in France, Belgium, North Africa, and Canada; follow-up ended in November 2012.
INTERVENTIONS: Colloids (n = 1414; gelatins, dextrans, hydroxyethyl starches, or 4% or 20% of albumin) or crystalloids (n = 1443; isotonic or hypertonic saline or Ringer lactate solution) for all fluid interventions other than fluid maintenance throughout the ICU stay. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was death within 28 days. Secondary outcomes included 90-day mortality; and days alive and not receiving renal replacement therapy, mechanical ventilation, or vasopressor therapy.
RESULTS: Within 28 days, there were 359 deaths (25.4%) in colloids group vs 390 deaths (27.0%) in crystalloids group (relative risk [RR], 0.96 [95% CI, 0.88 to 1.04]; P = .26). Within 90 days, there were 434 deaths (30.7%) in colloids group vs 493 deaths (34.2%) in crystalloids group (RR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.86 to 0.99]; P = .03). Renal replacement therapy was used in 156 (11.0%) in colloids group vs 181 (12.5%) in crystalloids group (RR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.83 to 1.03]; P = .19). There were more days alive without mechanical ventilation in the colloids group vs the crystalloids group by 7 days (mean: 2.1 vs 1.8 days, respectively; mean difference, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.09 to 0.48] days; P = .01) and by 28 days (mean: 14.6 vs 13.5 days; mean difference, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.14 to 2.06] days; P = .01) and alive without vasopressor therapy by 7 days (mean: 5.0 vs 4.7 days; mean difference, 0.30 [95% CI, -0.03 to 0.50] days; P = .04) and by 28 days (mean: 16.2 vs 15.2 days; mean difference, 1.04 [95% CI, -0.04 to 2.10] days; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among ICU patients with hypovolemia, the use of colloids vs crystalloids did not result in a significant difference in 28-day mortality. Although 90-day mortality was lower among patients receiving colloids, this finding should be considered exploratory and requires further study before reaching conclusions about efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00318942.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24108515     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.280502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  153 in total

1.  Critical care: Mortality risk in the CRISTAL trial.

Authors:  David Holmes
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 28.314

2.  Effects of crystalloids and colloids on microcirculation, central venous oxygen saturation, and central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide gap in a rabbit model of hemorrhagic shock.

Authors:  Makiko Komori; Yuriko Samejima; Keiko Okamura; Junko Ichikawa; Mitsuharu Kodaka; Keiko Nishiyama; Yasuko Tomizawa
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 3.  [New KDIGO guidelines on acute kidney injury. Practical recommendations].

Authors:  A Zarbock; S John; A Jörres; D Kindgen-Milles
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 4.  Fluid type and the use of renal replacement therapy in sepsis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  B Rochwerg; W Alhazzani; A Gibson; C M Ribic; A Sindi; D Heels-Ansdell; L Thabane; A Fox-Robichaud; L Mbuagbaw; W Szczeklik; F Alshamsi; S Altayyar; W Ip; G Li; M Wang; A Włudarczyk; Q Zhou; D Annane; D J Cook; R Jaeschke; G H Guyatt
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  AKI associated with cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Robert H Thiele; James M Isbell; Mitchell H Rosner
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 6.  [Comments on the updated German S3 guidelines on intravascular volume therapy in adults].

Authors:  Emmanuel Schneck; Michael Sander; Bernd Saugel; Daniel A Reuter; Marit Habicher
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Introductory Overview: IATSIC Symposium, WJS.

Authors:  Timothy Craig Hardcastle
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 8.  [The role of colloids in intensive care medicine. Evidence instead of emotions].

Authors:  C S Bruells; A Schindler; G Marx
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 0.840

9.  Long-term outcomes in patients with severe sepsis randomised to resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 or Ringer's acetate.

Authors:  Anders Perner; Nicolai Haase; Per Winkel; Anne B Guttormsen; Jyrki Tenhunen; Gudmundur Klemenzson; Rasmus G Müller; Anders Aneman; Jørn Wetterslev
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 10.  Septic Shock: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Christopher W Seymour; Matthew R Rosengart
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.