| Literature DB >> 24106709 |
Peter Thomas1, Gerhard Iglhaut, Andreas Wollenberg, Dieter Cadosch, Burkhard Summer.
Abstract
Hypersensitivity reactions to titanium (Ti) are very rare. Thus, we assessed the proinflammatory response and also potential tolerance favoring in vitro reactivity of human blood lymphocytes and monocytes (PBMC) to Ti in healthy individuals (14 without, 6 with complication-free dental Ti implants). The proliferation index (SI) in lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) and production of cytokines linked to innate immune response (IL-1 β , IL-6, and TNF α ) or immune regulation (IL-10) were assessed in response to TiO2 particles or Ti discs. In both groups, the Ti-LTT reactivity was not enhanced (e.g., SI < 3). The control antigen tetanus toxoid (TT) gave adequate reactivity (median SI individuals without/with implant: 20.6 ± 5.97/19.58 ± 2.99). Individuals without implant showed higher cytokine response to Ti materials than individuals with symptom-free implants; for example, TiO2 rutile particle induced increase of IL-1 β 70.27-fold/8.49-fold versus control medium culture. PBMC of 5 of the 6 individuals with complication-free Ti implants showed an ex vivo ongoing production of IL-10 (mean 4.18 ± 2.98 pg/mL)-but none of the 14 controls showed such IL-10 production. Thus in vitro IL-1 β -, IL-6-, and TNF- α production reflects "normal" unspecific immune response to Ti. This might be reduced by production of tolerogenic IL-10 in individuals with symptom-free Ti dental implants.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24106709 PMCID: PMC3784072 DOI: 10.1155/2013/539834
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Ti-particles in anatase structure, mostly agglomerated.
Characteristics of the blood donors.
| Initials | Gender | Age | Ti dental implant | Other dental materials | CMI | Patch test | Smoker | Atopy | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | Since | ||||||||
| H.T. | m | 45 | 1a | 2006 | Crown; ceramic; metal | No | n.d. | No | No |
| T.B. | m | 21 | 3b | 2007 | No | No | n.d. | No | No |
| K.C. | m | 41 | 1c | 2003 | Crown; resin; ceramic | No | n.d. | No | ra |
| K.H. | m | 49 | 1d | 2009 | Crown; ceramic; metal | No | n.d. | No | ra |
| F.M. | m | 56 | 1e | 2006 | Crown; ceramic; metal | No | Negative | No | No |
| S.R. | f | 62 | 6f | 2005 | Crown; ceramic | No | n.d. | No | No |
| S.L. | f | 25 | None | Resin; ceramic | Yes | Ni; Lan. | No | No | |
| C.S. | m | 23 | None | No | No | Negative | No | ra; aa; ae | |
| H.C. | f | 23 | None | No | No | Negative | No | No | |
| P.M. | f | 24 | None | No | No | Negative | No | No | |
| G.G. | m | 31 | None | No | No | n.d. | No | No | |
| S.J. | m | 34 | None | Crown; resin; ceramic | No | Thiomer; Merc. | No | No | |
| F.T. | f | 29 | None | No | No | n.d. | No | ra | |
| A.A. | m | 34 | None | Ceramic; amalgame | No | n.d. | No | ra | |
| F.K. | m | 46 | None | Crown; metal | No | n.d. | No | ra | |
| N.J. | m | 33 | None | Crown; resin | No | n.d. | No | No | |
| S.F. | m | 23 | None | Crown; metal | No | n.d. | No | No | |
| E.R. | f | 30 | None | No | No | Negative | No | ra; ae; aa | |
| B.P. | f | 43 | None | Crown; resin; ceramic; metal | No | Negative | No | No | |
| R.C. | f | 35 | None | Crown; ceramic | No | n.d. | No | No | |
CMI: cutaneous metal intolerance; aa: allergic asthma; ra: rhinoconjunctivitis allergica; ae: atopic eczema.
Patch test reaction: Ni: nickel; Lan: lanolin; Thiomer: thiomersal; Merc: mercury-II-amidchloride; negative: no test reaction; n.d.: not done.
a,b,c,d,e,fImplant devices of different manufacturers (details known to the authors) made of pure titanium or TiAlVa alloy.
Figure 2Lymphocyte proliferation response of the PBMC of the 14 healthy individuals without titanium dental implants (open bar) and 6 blood donors with symptom-free titanium dental implants (closed bar). Reactivity to stimulation with titanium particles in rutile and anatase structures (5 × 10−4 M, 1 × 10−4 M, 5 × 10−5 M) ((a) and (b)), the three titanium metal discs (SBA, MA, and SA) (c) and to the controls (recall antigen) tetanus toxoid (TT) and (pan T cell mitogen) phytohemagglutinin (PHA), over 6 days. Stimulation index (SI) is given as ratio of stimulated culture to unstimulated culture.
Figure 3Production of IL-1β (a), IL-6 (b), and TNFα (c) of PBMC of the 20 blood donors (14 healthy individuals without titanium dental implants = open bar and 6 with symptom-free titanium dental implants = closed bar) after stimulation with titanium particles in anatase and rutile structures (5 × 10−4 M, 1 × 10−4 M, 5 × 10−5 M) and the three metal discs over 6 days. Fold increase versus stimulation with medium alone is given.
Spontaneous cytokine production by the ex vivo obtained PBMC of the 20 individuals. Cytokine levels were assessed in supernatants of unstimulated (e.g., only culture medium) 6 d cultures.
|
Individuals with titanium dental implant ( |
Individuals without titanium dental implant ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (pg/mL) | ± | Mean (pg/mL) | ± | |
| IL-1 | 9.04 | 16.87 | 23.39 | 65.47 |
| IL-6 | 688.33 | 1566.10 | 1909.8 | 4958.15 |
| IL-10 | 4.18 | 2.98 | 0 | 0 |
| TNF | 1.02 | 1.93 | 1.75 | 4.52 |
Figure 4Frequency (%) of spontaneous IL-10 production of PBMC of the blood donors (6 with, 14 without dental Ti implant) after 6 day culture with medium alone. **P < 0.001 (Fishers exact test).