Literature DB >> 24105914

Comparison of statistics in association tests of genetic markers for survival outcomes.

Franco Mendolia1, John P Klein, Effie W Petersdorf, Mari Malkki, Tao Wang.   

Abstract

Computationally efficient statistical tests are needed in association testing of large scale genetic markers for survival outcomes. In this study, we explore several test statistics based on the Cox proportional hazards model for survival data. First, we consider the classical partial likelihood-based Wald and score tests. A revised way to compute the score statistics is explored to improve the computational efficiency. Next, we propose a Cox-Snell residual-based score test, which allows us to handle the controlling variables more conveniently. We also illustrated the incorporation of these three tests into a permutation procedure to adjust for the multiple testing. In addition, we examine a simulation-based approach proposed by Lin (2005) to adjust for multiple testing. We presented the comparison of these four statistics in terms of type I error, power, family-wise error rate, and computational efficiency under various scenarios via extensive simulation.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cox proportional hazard model; Cox-Snell residuals; genetic markers; multiple testing; survival outcome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24105914      PMCID: PMC3985281          DOI: 10.1002/sim.5982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  13 in total

1.  Score tests for association between traits and haplotypes when linkage phase is ambiguous.

Authors:  Daniel J Schaid; Charles M Rowland; David E Tines; Robert M Jacobson; Gregory A Poland
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-12-27       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  Mapping complex disease loci in whole-genome association studies.

Authors:  Christopher S Carlson; Michael A Eberle; Leonid Kruglyak; Deborah A Nickerson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  An efficient Monte Carlo approach to assessing statistical significance in genomic studies.

Authors:  D Y Lin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-09-28       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  On rapid stimulation of P values in association studies.

Authors:  D Y Lin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Rapid simulation of P values for product methods and multiple-testing adjustment in association studies.

Authors:  S R Seaman; B Müller-Myhsok
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-01-11       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 6.  Biostatistical aspects of genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Andreas Ziegler; Inke R König; John R Thompson
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.207

7.  Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping.

Authors:  G A Churchill; R W Doerge
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  MHC-resident variation affects risks after unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Authors:  Effie W Petersdorf; Mari Malkki; Theodore A Gooley; Stephen R Spellman; Michael D Haagenson; Mary M Horowitz; Tao Wang
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 17.956

9.  PRESTO: rapid calculation of order statistic distributions and multiple-testing adjusted P-values via permutation for one and two-stage genetic association studies.

Authors:  Brian L Browning
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-07-13       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Rapid and accurate multiple testing correction and power estimation for millions of correlated markers.

Authors:  Buhm Han; Hyun Min Kang; Eleazar Eskin
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  2 in total

1.  Accurate computation of survival statistics in genome-wide studies.

Authors:  Fabio Vandin; Alexandra Papoutsaki; Benjamin J Raphael; Eli Upfal
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  On Path to Informing Hierarchy of Eplet Mismatches as Determinants of Kidney Transplant Loss.

Authors:  Hossein Mohammadhassanzadeh; Karim Oualkacha; Wenmin Zhang; William Klement; Amelie Bourdiec; Jennat Lamsatfi; Yang Yi; Bethany Foster; Paul Keown; Howard M Gebel; Frans Claas; Ruth Sapir-Pichhadze
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2021-03-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.