D Y Lin1. 1. Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, McGavran-Greenberg Hall, CB #7420, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7420, USA. lin@bios.unc.edu
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Multiple hypothesis testing is a common problem in genome research, particularly in microarray experiments and genomewide association studies. Failure to account for the effects of multiple comparisons would result in an abundance of false positive results. The Bonferroni correction and Holm's step-down procedure are overly conservative, whereas the permutation test is time-consuming and is restricted to simple problems. RESULTS: We developed an efficient Monte Carlo approach to approximating the joint distribution of the test statistics along the genome. We then used the Monte Carlo distribution to evaluate the commonly used criteria for error control, such as familywise error rates and positive false discovery rates. This approach is applicable to any data structures and test statistics. Applications to simulated and real data demonstrate that the proposed approach provides accurate error control, and can be substantially more powerful than the Bonferroni and Holm methods, especially when the test statistics are highly correlated.
MOTIVATION: Multiple hypothesis testing is a common problem in genome research, particularly in microarray experiments and genomewide association studies. Failure to account for the effects of multiple comparisons would result in an abundance of false positive results. The Bonferroni correction and Holm's step-down procedure are overly conservative, whereas the permutation test is time-consuming and is restricted to simple problems. RESULTS: We developed an efficient Monte Carlo approach to approximating the joint distribution of the test statistics along the genome. We then used the Monte Carlo distribution to evaluate the commonly used criteria for error control, such as familywise error rates and positive false discovery rates. This approach is applicable to any data structures and test statistics. Applications to simulated and real data demonstrate that the proposed approach provides accurate error control, and can be substantially more powerful than the Bonferroni and Holm methods, especially when the test statistics are highly correlated.
Authors: Daniel J Schaid; Jason P Sinnwell; Gregory D Jenkins; Shannon K McDonnell; James N Ingle; Michiaki Kubo; Paul E Goss; Joseph P Costantino; D Lawrence Wickerham; Richard M Weinshilboum Journal: Genet Epidemiol Date: 2011-12-07 Impact factor: 2.135
Authors: Leila Kokabee; Xianhui Wang; Christopher J Sevinsky; Wei Lin Winnie Wang; Lindsay Cheu; Sridar V Chittur; Morteza Karimipoor; Martin Tenniswood; Douglas S Conklin Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2015-09-18 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: Nancy E Thomas; Sharon N Edmiston; Irene Orlow; Peter A Kanetsky; Li Luo; David C Gibbs; Eloise A Parrish; Honglin Hao; Klaus J Busam; Bruce K Armstrong; Anne Kricker; Anne E Cust; Hoda Anton-Culver; Stephen B Gruber; Richard P Gallagher; Roberto Zanetti; Stefano Rosso; Lidia Sacchetto; Terence Dwyer; David W Ollila; Colin B Begg; Marianne Berwick; Kathleen Conway Journal: J Invest Dermatol Date: 2018-05-09 Impact factor: 8.551