Literature DB >> 24104856

Evidence-based patient information programme in early multiple sclerosis: a randomised controlled trial.

Sascha Köpke1, Simone Kern, Tjalf Ziemssen, Martin Berghoff, Ingo Kleiter, Martin Marziniak, Friedemann Paul, Eik Vettorazzi, Jana Pöttgen, Korbinian Fischer, Jürgen Kasper, Christoph Heesen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of an evidence-based patient information programme aiming to increase informed choice in patients with early multiple sclerosis (MS).
BACKGROUND: Patients with early MS face a number of uncertainties concerning diagnosis, prognosis and effectiveness of immunotherapy. Prior studies suggest that evidence-based patient information combined with group education can promote informed choice in MS patients.
METHODS: A 12-month, six-centre, double-blind randomised controlled clinical trial with 192 patients with a diagnosis of confirmed relapsing-remitting MS or clinical isolated syndrome in Germany. A 4-h interactive evidence-based educational programme was compared with a 4-h MS-specific stress management programme. The primary endpoint was informed choice after 6 months comprising risk knowledge and congruency between attitude towards immunotherapy and actual immunotherapy uptake. Secondary endpoints included autonomy preference, decision autonomy, decisional conflict and satisfaction, anxiety and depression, and number of immunotherapies.
RESULTS: For the primary endpoint, a significant difference was shown with 50 of 85 (59%) participants in the intervention group achieving informed choice after 6 months compared with 18 of 89 (20%) in the control group (OR 0.2 (95% CI 0.1 to 0.4), p<0.001). Four weeks after the intervention, more participants in the intervention group showed good risk knowledge (difference between groups 39% (95% CI 26% to 53%), p<0.001). There were no significant differences between groups for attitude towards immunotherapy and for immunotherapy uptake. There were trends towards increased autonomy preference after the intervention and increased adherence to immunotherapies in the intervention group.
CONCLUSIONS: The intervention significantly increased informed choice and relevant risk knowledge without negative side effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Multiple Sclerosis

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24104856     DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2013-306441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  30 in total

1.  [Current immunotherapy of multiple sclerosis].

Authors:  F Paul; K Ruprecht
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  A Systematic Review of Discrete-Choice Experiments and Conjoint Analysis Studies in People with Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Edward J D Webb; David Meads; Ieva Eskyte; Natalie King; Naila Dracup; Jeremy Chataway; Helen L Ford; Joachim Marti; Sue H Pavitt; Klaus Schmierer; Ana Manzano
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Potential negative impact of informing patients about medication side effects: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jimmy Jose; Lamia AlHajri
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2018-08-23

Review 4.  A Targeted Literature Search and Phenomenological Review of Perspectives of People with Multiple Sclerosis and Healthcare Professionals of the Immunology of Disease-Modifying Therapies.

Authors:  Jeri Burtchell; Daisy Clemmons; Joann Clemmons; Tim Sabutis; Adeline Rosenberg; Jennifer Graves; Michael L Sweeney; John Kramer; Marina Ziehn; Brandon Brown; Jamie L Weiss; Ahmed Z Obeidat
Journal:  Neurol Ther       Date:  2022-05-24

5.  Development of a scale for the evaluation of the quality of the shared decision process in multiple sclerosis patients.

Authors:  Elena Álvarez-Rodríguez; César Manuel Sánchez-Franco; María José Pérez-Haro; Laura Bello-Otero; Marta Aguado-Valcarcel; Inés González-Suárez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  The IN-DEEP project "INtegrating and Deriving Evidence, Experiences, Preferences": a web information model on magnetic resonance imaging for people with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Cinzia Colombo; Paolo Confalonieri; Marco Rovaris; Loredana La Mantia; Paolo Galeazzi; Anita Pariani; Simonetta Gerevini; Nicola De Stefano; Roberta Guglielmino; Cinzia Caserta; Paola Mosconi; Graziella Filippini
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-05-02       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  "I Will Respect the Autonomy of My Patient": A Scoping Review of Shared Decision Making in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Anne Christin Rahn; Alessandra Solari; Heleen Beckerman; Richard Nicholas; David Wilkie; Christoph Heesen; Andrea Giordano
Journal:  Int J MS Care       Date:  2020-12-28

Review 8.  Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.

Authors:  France Légaré; Rhéda Adekpedjou; Dawn Stacey; Stéphane Turcotte; Jennifer Kryworuchko; Ian D Graham; Anne Lyddiatt; Mary C Politi; Richard Thomson; Glyn Elwyn; Norbert Donner-Banzhoff
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-07-19

9.  Information provision for people with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Sascha Köpke; Alessandra Solari; Anne Rahn; Fary Khan; Christoph Heesen; Andrea Giordano
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-14

10.  Shared Decision Making and Autonomy Among US Participants with Multiple Sclerosis in the NARCOMS Registry.

Authors:  Stacey S Cofield; Nina Thomas; Tuula Tyry; Robert J Fox; Amber Salter
Journal:  Int J MS Care       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.