Literature DB >> 24104389

The diagnostic classification of eating disorders: current situation, possible alternatives and future perspectives.

F Dazzi1, F G Di Leone.   

Abstract

The current nosography of eating disorders (ED) has various limitations in terms of validity and accuracy. The changes adopted in the DSM-5 limit some of the current problems, such as excessive prevalence of ED not otherwise specified (EDNOS) and the lack of longitudinal stability, but are unlikely to adequately capture the clinical complexity of ED. Many authors suggest the need for a thorough review of the current nosography to support evidence-based classification. In this paper, we discuss the validity of the current diagnostic categories and their possible reorganization. Furthermore, we review the main empirical models of classification and the diagnostic approach from a personality perspective, with particular attention to research and to the prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24104389     DOI: 10.1007/s40519-013-0076-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eat Weight Disord        ISSN: 1124-4909            Impact factor:   4.652


  65 in total

Review 1.  Empirical classification of eating disorders.

Authors:  Pamela K Keel; Tiffany A Brown; Lauren A Holland; Lindsay P Bodell
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 18.561

2.  A personality classification system for eating disorders: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Heather Thompson-Brenner; Kamryn T Eddy; Debra L Franko; David J Dorer; Maryna Vashchenko; Andrea E Kass; David B Herzog
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 3.735

3.  An empirical study of the typology of bulimia nervosa and its spectrum variants.

Authors:  Ruth H Striegel-Moore; Debra L Franko; Douglas Thompson; Bruce Barton; George B Schreiber; Stephen R Daniels
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 7.723

4.  Personality subtypes in eating disorders: validation of a classification in a naturalistic sample.

Authors:  Heather Thompson-Brenner; Drew Westen
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 9.319

Review 5.  Alternative methods of classifying eating disorders: models incorporating comorbid psychopathology and associated features.

Authors:  Jennifer E Wildes; Marsha D Marcus
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2013-01-26

Review 6.  [Purging disorder--a distinct diagnosis? Review about the current state of research].

Authors:  Sonja Koch; Norbert Quadflieg; Winfried Rief; Manfred Fichter
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol       Date:  2013-02-04

7.  Application of a latent class analysis to empirically define eating disorder phenotypes.

Authors:  Pamela K Keel; Manfred Fichter; Norbert Quadflieg; Cynthia M Bulik; Mark G Baxter; Laura Thornton; Katherine A Halmi; Allan S Kaplan; Michael Strober; D Blake Woodside; Scott J Crow; James E Mitchell; Alessandro Rotondo; Mauro Mauri; Giovanni Cassano; Janet Treasure; David Goldman; Wade H Berrettini; Walter H Kaye
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2004-02

8.  Impact of altering DSM-IV criteria for anorexia and bulimia nervosa on the base rates of eating disorder diagnoses.

Authors:  J M Thaw; D A Williamson; C K Martin
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.008

9.  Eating disorders, DSM-5 and clinical reality.

Authors:  Christopher G Fairburn; Zafra Cooper
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 9.319

10.  Thinking afresh about the classification of eating disorders.

Authors:  Christopher G Fairburn; Zafra Cooper
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.861

View more
  1 in total

1.  A retrospective study of the impact of DSM-5 on the diagnosis of eating disorders in Victoria, Australia.

Authors:  Henry Caudle; Christine Pang; Sam Mancuso; David Castle; Richard Newton
Journal:  J Eat Disord       Date:  2015-11-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.