Heather Thompson-Brenner1, Drew Westen. 1. Center for Anxiety and Related Disorders, Department of Psychology, Boston University, 648 Beacon Street, Boston, MA 02215, USA. ht141@hotmail.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Research has identified three personality subtypes in patients with eating disorders: emotionally dysregulated, constricted and high-functioning/perfectionistic. AIMS: To see whether the subtypes are distinguished in ways indicative of valid classification, notably in patterns of adaptive functioning, comorbidity, treatment response and therapeutic interventions. METHOD: A random sample of experienced clinicians provided data on 145 patients with bulimic symptoms, including data on eating disorder symptoms, DSM-IV comorbidity, personality pathology, treatment response and treatment interventions. RESULTS: Patients categorised as dysregulated had the poorest functioning, most comorbidity and worst outcome, followed by patients in the constricted and high-functioning groups. The three subtypes elicited different therapeutic interventions and accounted for substantial incremental variance in outcome, holding constant the severity of eating disorder symptoms and presence of other Axis I disorders. CONCLUSIONS: The data provide accumulating evidence for the validity of three personality subtypes in patients with eating disorders.
BACKGROUND: Research has identified three personality subtypes in patients with eating disorders: emotionally dysregulated, constricted and high-functioning/perfectionistic. AIMS: To see whether the subtypes are distinguished in ways indicative of valid classification, notably in patterns of adaptive functioning, comorbidity, treatment response and therapeutic interventions. METHOD: A random sample of experienced clinicians provided data on 145 patients with bulimic symptoms, including data on eating disorder symptoms, DSM-IV comorbidity, personality pathology, treatment response and treatment interventions. RESULTS:Patients categorised as dysregulated had the poorest functioning, most comorbidity and worst outcome, followed by patients in the constricted and high-functioning groups. The three subtypes elicited different therapeutic interventions and accounted for substantial incremental variance in outcome, holding constant the severity of eating disorder symptoms and presence of other Axis I disorders. CONCLUSIONS: The data provide accumulating evidence for the validity of three personality subtypes in patients with eating disorders.
Authors: Dina Vivian; Rachel Hershenberg; Bethany A Teachman; Deborah A G Drabick; Marvin R Goldfried; Barry Wolfe Journal: Psychotherapy (Chic) Date: 2012-06
Authors: Jennifer E Wildes; Marsha D Marcus; Ross D Crosby; Rebecca M Ringham; Marcela Marin Dapelo; Jill A Gaskill; Kelsie T Forbush Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2011-10
Authors: Lily A Brown; Michelle G Craske; Daniel E Glenn; Murray B Stein; Greer Sullivan; Cathy Sherbourne; Alexander Bystritsky; Stacy S Welch; Laura Campbell-Sills; Ariel Lang; Peter Roy-Byrne; Raphael D Rose Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2012-12-05 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Ann F Haynos; Carolyn M Pearson; Linsey M Utzinger; Stephen A Wonderlich; Ross D Crosby; James E Mitchell; Scott J Crow; Carol B Peterson Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2016-09-09 Impact factor: 4.861