Literature DB >> 24103448

What is learned during simultaneous temporal acquisition? An individual-trials analysis.

Marcelo Bussotti Reyes1, Catalin V Buhusi2.   

Abstract

The processes involved in the acquisition of simultaneous temporal processing are currently less understood. For example, it is unclear whether scalar property emerges early during simultaneous temporal acquisition. Using an information-processing model which accounts for the amount of information that each temporal process provides in regard to reward time, we predicted that scalar property would emerge early during the acquisition process, but that subjects should take about 27% longer (more trials) to acquire the long duration than the short duration. To evaluate these predictions, we performed individual-trials analyses to identify changes in timing behavior when rats simultaneously acquire two criterion durations, either 10s and 20s (group 10/20) or 20s and 40s (group 20/40). To analyze the individual trials we used a change-point algorithm to identify changes in rats' wait time. For each individual rat, and for each criterion duration, analyses indicated that simultaneous temporal acquisition is characterized by a sudden change in waiting to a wait-time proportional to the associated criterion. The results failed to indicate group differences in regard to the number of trials it takes for the change in wait-time to occur, but that in both groups, it took longer (more trials) to acquire the long duration than the shorter one, not significantly different from the theoretical prediction. These results are discussed in the framework of an information-processing model informing both associative and temporal learning, thus providing a bridge between the two fields. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Associative and Temporal Learning.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acquisition; Change point analysis; Entropy; Fixed interval; Information; Informativeness; Interval timing; Scalar property; Speed of learning

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24103448      PMCID: PMC7119331          DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  27 in total

1.  Sources of variability and systematic error in mouse timing behavior.

Authors:  C R Gallistel; Adam King; Robert McDonald
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2004-01

2.  On the evils of group averaging: commentary on Nevin's "Resistance to extinction and behavioral momentum".

Authors:  C R Gallistel
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 3.  Relative time sharing: new findings and an extension of the resource allocation model of temporal processing.

Authors:  Catalin V Buhusi; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Resistance to extinction and behavioral momentum.

Authors:  John A Nevin
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  A behavioral theory of timing.

Authors:  P R Killeen; J G Fetterman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Differences between simultaneous and blocked training detected by a transfer test.

Authors:  Marcelo S Caetano; Paulo Guilhardi; Russell M Church
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  The acquisition of conditioned responding.

Authors:  Justin A Harris
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2011-04

Review 8.  It's the information!

Authors:  Ryan D Ward; C R Gallistel; Peter D Balsam
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Temporal context calibrates interval timing.

Authors:  Mehrdad Jazayeri; Michael N Shadlen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Temporal maps and informativeness in associative learning.

Authors:  Peter D Balsam; C Randy Gallistel
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 13.837

View more
  1 in total

1.  Inactivation of the Medial-Prefrontal Cortex Impairs Interval Timing Precision, but Not Timing Accuracy or Scalar Timing in a Peak-Interval Procedure in Rats.

Authors:  Catalin V Buhusi; Marcelo B Reyes; Cody-Aaron Gathers; Sorinel A Oprisan; Mona Buhusi
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.