Literature DB >> 21381859

The acquisition of conditioned responding.

Justin A Harris1.   

Abstract

This report analyzes the acquisition of conditioned responses in rats trained in a magazine approach paradigm. Following the suggestion by Gallistel, Fairhurst, and Balsam (2004), Weibull functions were fitted to the trial-by-trial response rates of individual rats. These showed that the emergence of responding was often delayed, after which the response rate would increase relatively gradually across trials. The fit of the Weibull function to the behavioral data of each rat was equaled by that of a cumulative exponential function incorporating a response threshold. Thus, the growth in conditioning strength on each trial can be modeled by the derivative of the exponential--a difference term of the form used in many models of associative learning (e.g., Rescorla & Wagner, 1972). Further analyses, comparing the acquisition of responding with a continuously reinforced stimulus (CRf) and a partially reinforced stimulus (PRf), provided further evidence in support of the difference term. In conclusion, the results are consistent with conventional models that describe learning as the growth of associative strength, incremented on each trial by an error-correction process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21381859     DOI: 10.1037/a0021883

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  9 in total

Review 1.  Temporal contingency.

Authors:  C R Gallistel; Andrew R Craig; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  Extinction from a rationalist perspective.

Authors:  C R Gallistel
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Separation of time-based and trial-based accounts of the partial reinforcement extinction effect.

Authors:  Mark E Bouton; Amanda M Woods; Travis P Todd
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Effects of conditioned stimulus (CS) duration, intertrial interval, and I/T ratio on appetitive Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  Eric A Thrailkill; Travis P Todd; Mark E Bouton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 2.478

5.  What is learned during simultaneous temporal acquisition? An individual-trials analysis.

Authors:  Marcelo Bussotti Reyes; Catalin V Buhusi
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 6.  Time to rethink the neural mechanisms of learning and memory.

Authors:  Charles R Gallistel; Peter D Balsam
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 2.877

7.  Blood pressure variations real-time reflect the conditioned fear learning and memory.

Authors:  Yuan-Chang Hsu; Lung Yu; Hsiun-ing Chen; Hui-Ling Lee; Yu-Min Kuo; Chauying J Jen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Duration of the unconditioned stimulus in appetitive conditioning of honeybees differentially impacts learning, long-term memory strength, and the underlying protein synthesis.

Authors:  Kathrin Marter; M Katharina Grauel; Carmen Lewa; Laura Morgenstern; Christina Buckemüller; Karin Heufelder; Marion Ganz; Dorothea Eisenhardt
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 2.460

9.  Cognitive assessment of mice strains heterozygous for cell-adhesion genes reveals strain-specific alterations in timing.

Authors:  C R Gallistel; Valter Tucci; Patrick M Nolan; Melitta Schachner; Igor Jakovcevski; Aaron Kheifets; Luendro Barboza
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 6.237

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.