Literature DB >> 24102189

Does moonlight increase predation risk? Meta-analysis reveals divergent responses of nocturnal mammals to lunar cycles.

Laura R Prugh1, Christopher D Golden2.   

Abstract

The risk of predation strongly affects mammalian population dynamics and community interactions. Bright moonlight is widely believed to increase predation risk for nocturnal mammals by increasing the ability of predators to detect prey, but the potential for moonlight to increase detection of predators and the foraging efficiency of prey has largely been ignored. Studies have reported highly variable responses to moonlight among species, calling into question the assumption that moonlight increases risk. Here, we conducted a quantitative meta-analysis examining the effects of moonlight on the activity of 59 nocturnal mammal species to test the assumption that moonlight increases predation risk. We examined patterns of lunarphilia and lunarphobia across species in relation to factors such as trophic level, habitat cover preference and visual acuity. Across all species included in the meta-analysis, moonlight suppressed activity. The magnitude of suppression was similar to the presence of a predator in experimental studies of foraging rodents (13.6% and 18.7% suppression, respectively). Contrary to the expectation that moonlight increases predation risk for all prey species, however, moonlight effects were not clearly related to trophic level and were better explained by phylogenetic relatedness, visual acuity and habitat cover. Moonlight increased the activity of prey species that use vision as their primary sensory system and suppressed the activity of species that primarily use other senses (e.g. olfaction, echolocation), and suppression was strongest in open habitat types. Strong taxonomic patterns underlay these relationships: moonlight tended to increase primate activity, whereas it tended to suppress the activity of rodents, lagomorphs, bats and carnivores. These results indicate that visual acuity and habitat cover jointly moderate the effect of moonlight on predation risk, whereas trophic position has little effect. While the net effect of moonlight appears to increase predation risk for most nocturnal mammals, our results highlight the importance of sensory systems and phylogenetic history in determining the level of risk.
© 2013 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2013 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  foraging efficiency; giving‐up density; illumination; indirect effects; lunar cycles; moonlight; nocturnality; phylogenetic meta‐analysis; predation risk; risk‐sensitive foraging

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24102189     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  28 in total

1.  Does fear beget fear? Risk-mediated habitat selection triggers predator avoidance at lower trophic levels.

Authors:  Carmen K Blubaugh; Ivy V Widick; Ian Kaplan
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  How does environment influence fighting? The effects of tidal flow on resource value and fighting costs in sea anemones.

Authors:  Alexandre V Palaoro; Mariana Velasque; Sandro Santos; Mark Briffa
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Temporal activity patterns of North China leopards and their prey in response to moonlight and habitat factors.

Authors:  Muhammad Zaman; Nathan James Roberts; Mengyan Zhu; Kasereka Vitekere; Meng Wang; Guangshun Jiang
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.167

4.  A small neighborhood well-organized: seasonal and daily activity patterns of the community of large and mid-sized mammals around waterholes in the Gobi Desert, Mongolia.

Authors:  Battogtokh Nasanbat; Francisco Ceacero; Samiya Ravchig
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 3.172

5.  Risky Business: The Function of Play in a Venomous Mammal-The Javan Slow Loris (Nycticebus javanicus).

Authors:  Meg Barrett; Marco Campera; Thais Q Morcatty; Ariana V Weldon; Katherine Hedger; Keely Q Maynard; Muhammad Ali Imron; K A I Nekaris
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.546

6.  Effect of an invasive plant and moonlight on rodent foraging behavior in a coastal dune ecosystem.

Authors:  Matthew D Johnson; Yesenia L De León
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Estimating Lion Abundance using N-mixture Models for Social Species.

Authors:  Jerrold L Belant; Florent Bled; Clay M Wilton; Robert Fyumagwa; Stanslaus B Mwampeta; Dean E Beyer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Mammalian ranges are experiencing erosion of natural darkness.

Authors:  James P Duffy; Jonathan Bennie; América P Durán; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  White-tailed deer vigilance: the influence of social and environmental factors.

Authors:  Marcus A Lashley; M Colter Chitwood; Michael T Biggerstaff; Daniel L Morina; Christopher E Moorman; Christopher S DePerno
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Euarchontan Opsin Variation Brings New Focus to Primate Origins.

Authors:  Amanda D Melin; Konstans Wells; Gillian L Moritz; Logan Kistler; Joseph D Orkin; Robert M Timm; Henry Bernard; Maklarin B Lakim; George H Perry; Shoji Kawamura; Nathaniel J Dominy
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 16.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.