OBJECTIVE: To assess differences between men and women in the prevalence of diabetes mellitus, impaired fasting glycaemia and impaired glucose tolerance in sub-Saharan Africa. METHODS: In September 2011, the PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched for community-based, cross-sectional studies providing sex-specific prevalences of any of the three study conditions among adults living in parts of sub-Saharan Africa (i.e. in Eastern, Middle and Southern Africa according to the United Nations subregional classification for African countries). A random-effects model was then used to calculate and compare the odds of men and women having each condition. FINDINGS: In a meta-analysis of the 36 relevant, cross-sectional data sets that were identified, impaired fasting glycaemia was found to be more common in men than in women (OR: 1.56; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.20-2.03), whereas impaired glucose tolerance was found to be less common in men than in women (OR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.72-0.98). The prevalence of diabetes mellitus - which was generally similar in both sexes (OR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.91-1.11) - was higher among the women in Southern Africa than among the men from the same subregion and lower among the women from Eastern and Middle Africa and from low-income countries of sub-Saharan Africa than among the corresponding men. CONCLUSION: Compared with women in the same subregions, men in Eastern, Middle and Southern Africa were found to have a similar overall prevalence of diabetes mellitus but were more likely to have impaired fasting glycaemia and less likely to have impaired glucose tolerance.
OBJECTIVE: To assess differences between men and women in the prevalence of diabetes mellitus, impaired fasting glycaemia and impaired glucose tolerance in sub-Saharan Africa. METHODS: In September 2011, the PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched for community-based, cross-sectional studies providing sex-specific prevalences of any of the three study conditions among adults living in parts of sub-Saharan Africa (i.e. in Eastern, Middle and Southern Africa according to the United Nations subregional classification for African countries). A random-effects model was then used to calculate and compare the odds of men and women having each condition. FINDINGS: In a meta-analysis of the 36 relevant, cross-sectional data sets that were identified, impaired fasting glycaemia was found to be more common in men than in women (OR: 1.56; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.20-2.03), whereas impaired glucose tolerance was found to be less common in men than in women (OR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.72-0.98). The prevalence of diabetes mellitus - which was generally similar in both sexes (OR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.91-1.11) - was higher among the women in Southern Africa than among the men from the same subregion and lower among the women from Eastern and Middle Africa and from low-income countries of sub-Saharan Africa than among the corresponding men. CONCLUSION: Compared with women in the same subregions, men in Eastern, Middle and Southern Africa were found to have a similar overall prevalence of diabetes mellitus but were more likely to have impaired fasting glycaemia and less likely to have impaired glucose tolerance.
Authors: Renate E van Genugten; Kristina M Utzschneider; Jenny Tong; Fernando Gerchman; Sakeneh Zraika; Jayalakshmi Udayasankar; Edward J Boyko; Wilfred Y Fujimoto; Steven E Kahn Journal: Diabetes Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Lisa Rafalson; Richard P Donahue; Jacek Dmochowski; Karol Rejman; Joan Dorn; Maurizio Trevisan Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2009-04-02 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Amy G Huebschmann; Rachel R Huxley; Wendy M Kohrt; Philip Zeitler; Judith G Regensteiner; Jane E B Reusch Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2019-08-27 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Michela Traglia; Dina Bseiso; Alexander Gusev; Brigid Adviento; Daniel S Park; Joel A Mefford; Noah Zaitlen; Lauren A Weiss Journal: Genetics Date: 2016-12-14 Impact factor: 4.562
Authors: Nida Haider; Jasmin Lebastchi; Ashok Kumar Jayavelu; Thiago M Batista; Hui Pan; Jonathan M Dreyfuss; Ivan Carcamo-Orive; Joshua W Knowles; Matthias Mann; C Ronald Kahn Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2021-11-01 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Natasha Sobers-Grannum; Madhuvanti M Murphy; Anders Nielsen; Cornelia Guell; T Alafia Samuels; Lisa Bishop; Nigel Unwin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-05-21 Impact factor: 3.240