OBJECTIVES: To assess the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in discriminating between active and inactive juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients and to compare physical examination outcomes with MRI outcomes in the assessment of disease status in JIA patients. METHODS: Consecutive JIA patients with knee involvement were prospectively studied using an open-bore MRI. Imaging findings from 146 JIA patients were analysed (59.6% female; mean age, 12.9 years). Patients were classified as clinically active or inactive. MRI features were evaluated using the JAMRIS system, comprising validated scores for synovial hypertrophy, bone marrow oedema, cartilage lesions and bone erosions. RESULTS: Inter-reader reliability was good for all MRI features (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.87-0.94). No differences were found between the two groups regarding MRI scores of bone marrow oedema, cartilage lesions or bone erosions. Synovial hypertrophy scores differed significantly between groups (P = 0.016). Nonetheless, synovial hypertrophy was also present in 14 JIA patients (35.9%) with clinically inactive disease. Of JIA patients considered clinically active, 48.6% showed no signs of MRI-based synovitis. CONCLUSIONS: MRI can discriminate between clinically active and inactive JIA patients. However, physical examination is neither very sensitive nor specific in evaluating JIA disease activity compared with MRI. Subclinical synovitis was present in >35% of presumed clinically inactive patients. KEY POINTS: • MRI is sensitive for evaluating juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) disease activity. • Contrast-enhanced MRI can distinguish clinically active and inactive JIA patients. • Subclinical synovitis is present in 35.9 % of presumed clinically inactive patients. • Physical examination is neither sensitive nor specific in evaluating JIA disease activity.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in discriminating between active and inactive juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients and to compare physical examination outcomes with MRI outcomes in the assessment of disease status in JIA patients. METHODS: Consecutive JIA patients with knee involvement were prospectively studied using an open-bore MRI. Imaging findings from 146 JIA patients were analysed (59.6% female; mean age, 12.9 years). Patients were classified as clinically active or inactive. MRI features were evaluated using the JAMRIS system, comprising validated scores for synovial hypertrophy, bone marrow oedema, cartilage lesions and bone erosions. RESULTS: Inter-reader reliability was good for all MRI features (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.87-0.94). No differences were found between the two groups regarding MRI scores of bone marrow oedema, cartilage lesions or bone erosions. Synovial hypertrophy scores differed significantly between groups (P = 0.016). Nonetheless, synovial hypertrophy was also present in 14 JIA patients (35.9%) with clinically inactive disease. Of JIA patients considered clinically active, 48.6% showed no signs of MRI-based synovitis. CONCLUSIONS: MRI can discriminate between clinically active and inactive JIA patients. However, physical examination is neither very sensitive nor specific in evaluating JIA disease activity compared with MRI. Subclinical synovitis was present in >35% of presumed clinically inactive patients. KEY POINTS: • MRI is sensitive for evaluating juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) disease activity. • Contrast-enhanced MRI can distinguish clinically active and inactive JIA patients. • Subclinical synovitis is present in 35.9 % of presumed clinically inactive patients. • Physical examination is neither sensitive nor specific in evaluating JIA disease activity.
Authors: Janet M Gardner-Medwin; Orla G Killeen; Clive A J Ryder; Karen Bradshaw; Karl Johnson Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2006-09-15 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Amanda Brown; Raphael Hirsch; Tal Laor; Michael J Hannon; Marc C Levesque; Terence Starz; Kimberly Francis; C Kent Kwoh Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: S Magni-Manzoni; A Pistorio; E Labò; S Viola; P Garcia-Munitis; S Panigada; C Visconti; A Buoncompagni; A Martini; A Ravelli Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2007-10-26 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Robert Hemke; Taco W Kuijpers; Charlotte M Nusman; Dieneke Schonenberg-Meinema; Marion A J van Rossum; Koert M Dolman; J Merlijn van den Berg; Mario Maas Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-05-23 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: E Charlotte van Gulik; Mendy M Welsink-Karssies; J Merlijn van den Berg; Dieneke Schonenberg-Meinema; Koert M Dolman; Anouk M Barendregt; Charlotte M Nusman; Mario Maas; Taco W Kuijpers; Robert Hemke Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2018-01-06
Authors: Charlotte M Nusman; Robert Hemke; Marc A Benninga; Dieneke Schonenberg-Meinema; Angelika Kindermann; Marion A J van Rossum; J Merlijn van den Berg; Mario Maas; Taco W Kuijpers Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-08-02 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Robert Hemke; J Merlijn van den Berg; Charlotte M Nusman; E Charlotte van Gulik; Anouk M Barendregt; Dieneke Schonenberg-Meinema; Koert M Dolman; Taco W Kuijpers; Mario Maas Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-10-06 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Robert Hemke; Nikolay Tzaribachev; Anouk M Barendregt; J Merlijn van den Berg; Andrea S Doria; Mario Maas Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2018-05-08