Mengxia Li1, Alexander Sauer2, Annette Holl-Wieden3, Thomas Pabst2, Henning Neubauer4,5,6. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080, Würzburg, Germany. 2. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080, Würzburg, Germany. 3. Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080, Würzburg, Germany. 4. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080, Würzburg, Germany. inu75@web.de. 5. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, 89081, Ulm, Germany. inu75@web.de. 6. SRH Clinic of Radiology, Albert-Schweitzer-Str. 2, 98527, Suhl, Germany. inu75@web.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of synovitis has been suggested as a possible non-invasive alternative to contrast-enhanced T1w imaging (ce-T1w). We aimed to study DWI for diagnosing synovitis in the knee joint of pediatric patients, to quantify inter-observer agreement on DWI and ce-T1w and to calculate quantitative measures of synovial diffusivity and conspicuity. METHODS: Forty consecutive patients with known or suspected arthritis of the knee (25 girls, median age 12 years) underwent routine 1.5T MRI with ce-T1w and transverse DWI with b values 50 and 800 s/mm2. Mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and signal intensity of inflamed synovium, joint effusion and muscle were measured with regions of interest retrospectively. Post-contrast T1w images (diagnostic standard) and diffusion-weighted images at b = 800 s/mm2 with ADC map were separately rated by three independent and blinded readers with different levels of expertise for the presence and degree of synovitis along with the level of diagnostic confidence. RESULTS: Thirty-one (78%) patients showed at least some synovial contrast enhancement, 17 (43%) children were diagnosed with synovitis on ce-T1w. Ratings by the 1st reader on ce-T1w and on DWI for synovitis showed very good agreement (kappa = 0.90). Inter-observer agreement on DWI ranged from moderate to substantial with kappa values between 0.68 and 0.79 (all P < 0.001). Agreement and diagnostic confidence were generally lower in patients with mild and without synovial enhancement, compared to patients with synovitis. DWI yielded higher signal of inflamed synovium vs. muscle tissue, but lower signal vs. joint effusion, compared to ce-T1w (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Diffusion-weighted imaging is a promising, though reader-dependent alternative to contrast-enhanced imaging in patients with arthritis of the knee, based on our preliminary findings. It holds potential for increasing patient safety and comfort.
BACKGROUND: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of synovitis has been suggested as a possible non-invasive alternative to contrast-enhanced T1w imaging (ce-T1w). We aimed to study DWI for diagnosing synovitis in the knee joint of pediatric patients, to quantify inter-observer agreement on DWI and ce-T1w and to calculate quantitative measures of synovial diffusivity and conspicuity. METHODS: Forty consecutive patients with known or suspected arthritis of the knee (25 girls, median age 12 years) underwent routine 1.5T MRI with ce-T1w and transverse DWI with b values 50 and 800 s/mm2. Mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and signal intensity of inflamed synovium, joint effusion and muscle were measured with regions of interest retrospectively. Post-contrast T1w images (diagnostic standard) and diffusion-weighted images at b = 800 s/mm2 with ADC map were separately rated by three independent and blinded readers with different levels of expertise for the presence and degree of synovitis along with the level of diagnostic confidence. RESULTS: Thirty-one (78%) patients showed at least some synovial contrast enhancement, 17 (43%) children were diagnosed with synovitis on ce-T1w. Ratings by the 1st reader on ce-T1w and on DWI for synovitis showed very good agreement (kappa = 0.90). Inter-observer agreement on DWI ranged from moderate to substantial with kappa values between 0.68 and 0.79 (all P < 0.001). Agreement and diagnostic confidence were generally lower in patients with mild and without synovial enhancement, compared to patients with synovitis. DWI yielded higher signal of inflamed synovium vs. muscle tissue, but lower signal vs. joint effusion, compared to ce-T1w (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Diffusion-weighted imaging is a promising, though reader-dependent alternative to contrast-enhanced imaging in patients with arthritis of the knee, based on our preliminary findings. It holds potential for increasing patient safety and comfort.
Entities:
Keywords:
Diffusion-weighted imaging; Knee joint; Magnetic resonance imaging; Pediatric; Synovitis
Authors: Ross E Petty; Taunton R Southwood; Prudence Manners; John Baum; David N Glass; Jose Goldenberg; Xiaohu He; Jose Maldonado-Cocco; Javier Orozco-Alcala; Anne-Marie Prieur; Maria E Suarez-Almazor; Patricia Woo Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Robert Hemke; Marion A J van Rossum; Mira van Veenendaal; Maaike P Terra; Eline E Deurloo; Milko C de Jonge; J Merlijn van den Berg; Koert M Dolman; Taco W Kuijpers; Mario Maas Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-10-20 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Anouk M Barendregt; Charlotte M Nusman; Robert Hemke; Cristina Lavini; Dimitri Amiras; Taco W Kuijpers; Mario Maas Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2015-07-24 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Joshua L Bennett; Amanda Wood; Nicola Smith; Ravi Mistry; Karen Allen; Sharmila Jandial; John D Tuckett; S Claire Gowdy; Helen E Foster; Flora McErlane; Kieren G Hollingsworth Journal: Pediatr Rheumatol Online J Date: 2019-11-21 Impact factor: 3.054