Literature DB >> 24101135

A comparison on expression of selected biomarkers between primary lung cancers and matched metastases.

Dongwei Gao1, Tiehong Zhang, Sha Li, Qi Liu, Jiajun Du.   

Abstract

Many biomarkers have been identified to be new targeted drugs for lung cancer treatment. Their clinical outcomes are determined by their status mainly evaluated from primary cancer tissues. However, metastasis is the leading cause of death in cancer patients. It is unclear whether their status in primary cancers is similar to that in corresponding metastases. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate similarities or differences for the selected biomarker expression between primary lung cancers and matched metastases and to provide evidence for further using these targets in metastatic tumors from lung cancer. Eleven patients who had received resection of paired tissues of primary lung cancers and matched metastases were collected. The protein expression of VEGF, HIF-1α, Met, P53, TGF-β1, Cox-2 and TNF-α between paired tumors was detected by immunohistochemistry. The results showed that there was no statistical significance between primary cancers and matched metastases for the expressions of the selected biomarkers. The p values were more than 0.05. The major concordance of the selected biomarkers existed between paired primary and metastatic tumors. However, there were still minor differences. Differences in metastases compared with primary tumors were observed in respective two cases for VEGF, HIF-1α and Met, respective one case for TGF-β1, COX2 and TNFα and three cases for P53. In conclusion, there were major concordance and minor difference for each biomarker between primary lung tumors and corresponding metastases, which may have important implications for the understanding of current metastasis models and treatment of advanced lung cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24101135     DOI: 10.1007/s12032-013-0742-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  15 in total

Review 1.  Multidisciplinary management of lung cancer.

Authors:  Alexander Spira; David S Ettinger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Clonal and parallel evolution of primary lung cancers and their metastases revealed by molecular dissection of cancer cells.

Authors:  Kenji Takahashi; Takashi Kohno; Shingo Matsumoto; Yukihiro Nakanishi; Yasuhito Arai; Seiichiro Yamamoto; Toshiyoshi Fujiwara; Noriaki Tanaka; Jun Yokota
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  Clonal selection of metastasis within the life history of a tumor.

Authors:  James E Talmadge
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 4.  Lung cancer.

Authors:  Roy S Herbst; John V Heymach; Scott M Lippman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  The expression of transforming growth factor-beta1 is significantly correlated with the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and poor prognosis of patients with advanced gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  H Saito; S Tsujitani; S Oka; A Kondo; M Ikeguchi; M Maeta; N Kaibara
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Molecular predictors of response to epidermal growth factor receptor antagonists in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Lecia V Sequist; Daphne W Bell; Thomas J Lynch; Daniel A Haber
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-02-10       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Heterogeneity of breast cancer metastases: comparison of therapeutic target expression and promoter methylation between primary tumors and their multifocal metastases.

Authors:  Julie M Wu; Mary Jo Fackler; Marc K Halushka; Diana W Molavi; M Evangeline Taylor; Wei Wen Teo; Constance Griffin; John Fetting; Nancy E Davidson; Angelo M De Marzo; Jessica L Hicks; Dhananjay Chitale; Marc Ladanyi; Saraswati Sukumar; Pedram Argani
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Use of epidermal growth factor receptor/Kirsten rat sarcoma 2 viral oncogene homolog mutation testing to define clonal relationships among multiple lung adenocarcinomas: comparison with clinical guidelines.

Authors:  Nicolas Girard; Charuhas Deshpande; Christopher G Azzoli; Valerie W Rusch; William D Travis; Marc Ladanyi; William Pao
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression is a prognostic factor for radiotherapy outcome in advanced carcinoma of the cervix.

Authors:  J A Loncaster; R A Cooper; J P Logue; S E Davidson; R D Hunter; C M West
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Overexpression of hypoxia-inducible-factor 1alpha(HIF-1alpha) in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma correlates with lymph node metastasis and pathologic stage.

Authors:  T Kurokawa; M Miyamoto; K Kato; Y Cho; Y Kawarada; Y Hida; T Shinohara; T Itoh; S Okushiba; S Kondo; H Katoh
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  1 in total

1.  Reoperation Rates and Costs of Radial Head Arthroplasty Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Radial Head and Neck Fractures: A Retrospective Database Study.

Authors:  Daniel Reinhardt; E Bruce Toby; Jacob Brubacher
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2019-04-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.