| Literature DB >> 12966423 |
T Kurokawa1, M Miyamoto, K Kato, Y Cho, Y Kawarada, Y Hida, T Shinohara, T Itoh, S Okushiba, S Kondo, H Katoh.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical and histopathologic significance of hypoxia-inducible-factor 1alpha (HIF-1alpha) expression in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. One hundred and thirty surgically resected specimens of OSCC were immunohistochemically assessed for HIF-1alpha expression with monoclonal antibody. High HIF-1alpha immunostaining was detected in 40 specimens. The percentage of high HIF-1alpha expression cases increased with tumour stage according to pTNM system. High HIF-1alpha expression correlated with pTNM stage, depth of tumour invasion, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, lymphatic invasion and positive surgical margin. The overall survival rate was worse in patients with high HIF-1alpha pattern than in patients with low-expression pattern. Univariate analyses identified high HIF-1alpha positivity, depth of tumour invasion, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, lymphatic invasion, and a positive surgical margin as risk factors. Multivariate analyses indicated that depth of tumour invasion, lymph node metastasis and positive surgical margin, but not HIF-1alpha, were independent prognostic factors. Survival in patients with a high HIF-1alpha expression was significantly worse than in those with low expression in patient treated with adjuvant therapy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2003 PMID: 12966423 PMCID: PMC2376949 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601186
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Characteristics of 130 patients with OSCC
| Gender | |
| Male | 113 |
| Female | 17 |
| Age | |
| <60 | 44 |
| ≧60 | 86 |
| Pathological stage(UICC) | |
| I | 40 |
| IIA | 21 |
| IIB | 20 |
| III | 29 |
| IVA | 8 |
| IVB | 12 |
| Primary tumour | |
| T1 | 56 |
| T2 | 16 |
| T3 | 46 |
| T4 | 12 |
| Regional lymph node | |
| N0 | 64 |
| N1 | 66 |
| Distant Metastasis | |
| M0 | 108 |
| M1 | 22 |
| Histological type | |
| G1 | 31 |
| G2 | 63 |
| G3 | 36 |
| Performance status | |
| P0 | 114 |
| P1 | 15 |
| P2 | 1 |
| Adjuvant therapy | |
| Chemotherapy | 12 |
| Radiotherapy | 18 |
| Chemoradiotherapy | 22 |
| None | 78 |
Figure 1Representative photomicrographs of immunohistochemical staining of HIF1α (× 200). Tumour cell immunoreactivity was scored based on nuclear and cytoplasmic staining. (A) −, no staining (B) 1+, nuclear staining in less than 1% of cells (C) nuclear staining in 1-10% of cells and/or with weak cytoplasmic staining (D) 3+, nuclear staining in 10-50% of cells and/or with distinct cytoplasmic staining, (E) 4+, nuclear staining in more than 50% of cells and/or with strong cytoplasmic staining. (F) HIF-1α-positive cells are already found in carcinoma in situ.
Hypoxia-inducible factor 1α expression in OSCC by tumour stage
| Stage I | 17 | 6 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 6/40(15.0%) |
| Stage II | 17 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 11/41(26.8%) |
| Stage III | 6 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 13/29(44.8%) |
| Stage IV | 2 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 10/20(50.0%) |
Correlation between clinicopathologic features and HIF 1α expression in surgical specimens of OSCC
| Gender | |||
| Male | 34 | 79 | 0.6646 |
| Female | 6 | 11 | |
| Age | |||
| ≧60 | 22 | 64 | 0.0732 |
| <60 | 18 | 26 | |
| Double cancer | |||
| Yes | 7 | 19 | 0.6347 |
| No | 33 | 71 | |
| p-Stage | |||
| I–II | 17 | 64 | 0.0019 |
| III–IV | 23 | 26 | |
| Histologic grade | |||
| G | 11 | 21 | 0.6107 |
| Others | 29 | 69 | |
| Depth of tumour invasion | |||
| I–II | 16 | 56 | 0.0186 |
| III–IV | 24 | 34 | |
| Lymph node metastasis | |||
| N0 | 12 | 52 | 0.0035 |
| N1 | 28 | 38 | |
| Distant metastasis | |||
| M0 | 29 | 79 | 0.0320 |
| M1 | 11 | 11 | |
| Tumor size (cm) | |||
| <4.5 | 17 | 43 | 0.5774 |
| >4.5 | 23 | 47 | |
| Lymphatic invasion | |||
| Positive | 27 | 44 | 0.0492 |
| Negative | 13 | 46 | |
| Vascular invasion | |||
| Positive | 17 | 26 | 0.1279 |
| Negative | 23 | 64 | |
| Surgical margin | |||
| Positive | 6 | 3 | 0.0156 |
| Negative | 34 | 87 | |
| Adjuvant therapy | |||
| Yes | 18 | 34 | 0.4379 |
| No | 22 | 56 | |
TNM classification system of the International Union Against Cancer.
Figure 2Kaplan–Meier overall survival curves of patients with OSCC with and without high HIF-1α expression. P=0.0007 by the log-rank test.
Univariate and multivariate analysis of HIF-1α and pathologic parameters in patients undergoing curative resection of OSCC
| HIF-1 | 2.629 (1.472–4.694) | 0.0011 |
| Gender | 2.820 (0.877–9.074) | 0.0820 |
| Age | 1.013 (0.571–1.800) | 0.8815 |
| Double cancer | 0.700 (0.339–1.445) | 0.3347 |
| p-Grade | 1.749 (0.786–3.891) | 0.1704 |
| Depth of tumour invasion | 4.040 (2.215–7.368) | <0.0001 |
| Lymph node metastasis | 5.623 (2.843–11.120) | <0.0001 |
| Distant Metastasis | 3.269 (1.761–6.068) | 0.0002 |
| Tumour size | 1.729 (0.965–3.099) | 0.0658 |
| Lymphatic invasion | 2.565 (1.406–4.681) | 0.0021 |
| Vascular invasion | 1.536 (0.847–2.784) | 0.1577 |
| Surgical margin | 5.181 (2.288–11.732) | <0.0001 |
| Adjuvant therapy | 1.018 (0.579–1.789) | 0.9501 |
| HIF-1 | 1.539 (0.835–2.837) | 0.1669 |
| Depth of tumour invasion | 2.646 (1.273–5.499) | 0.0091 |
| Lymph node metastasis | 4.504 (1.984–10.226) | 0.0003 |
| Distant metastasis | 1.036 (0.493–2.175) | 0.9263 |
| Lymphatic invasion | 0.691 (0.314–1.520) | 0.3580 |
| Surgical margin | 2.634 (1.057–6.561) | 0.0375 |
Figure 3Kaplan–Meier overall survival curves of patients with OSCC underwent adjuvant therapy with or without high HIF-1α expression. P=0.0464 by the log-rank test.