Literature DB >> 12966423

Overexpression of hypoxia-inducible-factor 1alpha(HIF-1alpha) in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma correlates with lymph node metastasis and pathologic stage.

T Kurokawa1, M Miyamoto, K Kato, Y Cho, Y Kawarada, Y Hida, T Shinohara, T Itoh, S Okushiba, S Kondo, H Katoh.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical and histopathologic significance of hypoxia-inducible-factor 1alpha (HIF-1alpha) expression in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. One hundred and thirty surgically resected specimens of OSCC were immunohistochemically assessed for HIF-1alpha expression with monoclonal antibody. High HIF-1alpha immunostaining was detected in 40 specimens. The percentage of high HIF-1alpha expression cases increased with tumour stage according to pTNM system. High HIF-1alpha expression correlated with pTNM stage, depth of tumour invasion, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, lymphatic invasion and positive surgical margin. The overall survival rate was worse in patients with high HIF-1alpha pattern than in patients with low-expression pattern. Univariate analyses identified high HIF-1alpha positivity, depth of tumour invasion, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, lymphatic invasion, and a positive surgical margin as risk factors. Multivariate analyses indicated that depth of tumour invasion, lymph node metastasis and positive surgical margin, but not HIF-1alpha, were independent prognostic factors. Survival in patients with a high HIF-1alpha expression was significantly worse than in those with low expression in patient treated with adjuvant therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12966423      PMCID: PMC2376949          DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


Oesophageal cancer is an aggressive tumour with a poor prognosis. Although diagnostic and surgical techniques have been advanced, survival rates have not been improved in the last decade, and the 5-year survival rate of patients with surgically treated oesophageal cancer remains less than 50% in spite of three-field lymph node dissection and combination chemotherapy and radiotherapy (Torres ; Adham ; Ando ; Collard ). The choice of therapeutic strategy is based primarily on whether lymph node metastasis has occurred. The presence of lymph node metastasis is the most important determinant of outcome (Ando ; Kusumi ). Patients with oesophageal cancer without nodal metastasis have a lower rate of recurrence after operation than those with nodal metastasis (Kato ; Matsubara ). However, it is difficult to determine whether lymph node metastases have occurred preoperatively in spite of new imaging techniques. Thus, the identification of a marker that predicts lymph node metastasis, and hence prognosis, is highly desirable. A hypoxic microenvironment is characteristic of many solid tumours. In the absence of neovascularisation, tumours cannot grow beyond several cubic millimeters, because the diffusion of oxygen, glucose, and other nutrients from blood vessels is limited (Dang and Semenza, 1999). Cancer cell proliferation may outpace the rate of angiogenesis, resulting in tissue hypoxia. To surmount these limitations, the tumour needs to acquire abilities that allow it to adapt to a hypoxic microenvironment (Maxwell ; Zhong ). Hypoxia-inducible-factor 1α(HIF-1α)is a 120 kDa nuclear protein. Hypoxia-inducible-factor 1 is a heterodimer, consisting of an α and a β subunit, both belonging to the basic–helix–loop–helix Per-aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator-Sim (PAS) family of transcription factors (Wang ). Hypoxia-inducible-factor-1 is an important component of a widely operative transcriptional response, activated by hypoxia, cobaltous ions, and iron chelation. Hypoxia-inducible-factor 1 activates transcription of hypoxia-inducible genes, including those encoding erythropoietin (Wang and Semenza 1993), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (Forsythe ), heme oxygenase-1 (Hoetzel ), inducible nitric oxide synthase (Jung ), and the glycolytic enzymes aldolase A, enolase 1, lactate dehydrogenase A (Semenza ), phosphofructokinase I (Minchenko ), and phosphoglycerate kinase I (Li ). The C-terminal of HIF-1α binds to p300, and p300/CBP-HIF complexes participate in the induction of hypoxia-responsive genes, including VEGF (Arany ). Induction of HIF-1α in response to hypoxia is instantaneous, and it can be expressed very early in carcinogenesis, before histologic evidence of angiogenesis or invasion exists (Ryan ). It has been shown that HIF-1α is a key player in the cancer cells response to low-oxygen tension in a variety of physiologic processes including embryogenesis (Ryan ), angiogenesis, tumorigenesis (Maxwell ) and metastases (Zhong ). Moreover, hypoxic regions have been shown to be both chemo- and radiation resistant (Teicher, 1994; Aebersold et al, 2001; Koukourakis ). In the current study, we examined archival material from 130 surgical specimens of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) for HIF-1α immunoreactivity. The purpose was to determine the correlation between HIF-1α immunoreactivity and clinical and histopathologic factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients and tissue samples

Surgical specimens were collected from 130 patients with primary OSCC, who underwent radical total oesophagectomy and three-field lymph node dissection from 1989 to 1999 at the Department of Surgical Oncology of Hokkaido University Hospital, Hokkaido Gastroenterology Hospital, or Teine Keijinkai Hospital. Cases of in-hospital death were excluded. The clinicopathologic stage was determined according to the TNM classification system of the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) (Sobin and Wittekind, 1997).

Immunohistochemistry

The expression of HIF-1α was determined immunohistochemically in paraffin-embedded specimens fixed in 10% formalin. Histologic slides, 4 μm in thickness, were deparaffined in xylene and rehydrated through a series of graded ethanol. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by incubation in 3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 10 min. The sections were washed twice in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and incubated with 10% normal goat serum (Histofine SAB-PO kit, Nichirei Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) for 30 min. The slides were then exposed overnight to a monoclonal antibody against HIF-1α(HIF-1αAb-4, NEO MARKERS, Fremont, CA, USA) at a dilution of 1:400 at 4°C. After washing in PBS, a biotinylated goat antibody to mouse immunoglobulin (Histofine SAB-PO kit, Nichirei Corporation) was applied, followed by incubation at room temperature for 60 min. The immunohistochemical reactions were developed in freshly prepared 3,3′-diamino-benzidine tetrahydrochloride (Histofine SAB-PO kit, Nichirei Corporation). Slides were counterstained in haematoxylin and coverslipped in a systemic mounting medium. Tissue samples incubated with nonimmune serum served as negative controls. Immunostaining was evaluated in three visual fields at a power of × 200 under an Olympus microscope (Olympus Optical, Tokyo, Japan). Tumour cell immunoreactivity to HIF-1α protein was scored based on the number of cells exhibiting the nuclear or cytoplasmic staining using the following classification system: −, no staining; 1+, nuclear staining in less than 1% of cells; 2+, nuclear staining in 1%–10% of cells and/or with weak cytoplasmic staining; 3+, nuclear staining in 10% to 50% of cells and/or with distinct cytoplasmic staining; 4+, nuclear staining in more than 50% of cells and/or with strong cytoplasmic staining. Hypoxia-inducible-factor 1α 3+and 4+were considered high expression patterns while the remaining cases were considered to be low expression. All specimens were evaluated by three investigators who were blinded to the patients' clinical information.

Statistical analysis

Either the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test was used to analyse the correlation between HIF-1α expression and clinicopathologic features. The cumulative survival rate was calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method, and the significance of differences in survival was analysed by the log-rank test. The univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazard regression model; P< 0.05 was considered significant in all analyses. Computations were performed using the Statview J version 4.5 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA) software package.

RESULTS

Patient factor

Specimens from 130 patients were included in the current study (113 male and 17 female patients). The median patient age was 63 years (range, 38–82 years). A relatively large number of patients had early-stage disease (81 patients, 62%). Sixty-six patients (51%) had lymph node metastases and 22 patients (17%) had distant nodal metastases. No patient had distant organ metastasis at the time of operation. The study population had the following performance status (PS): PS0, 114 patients; PS1, 15 patients; and PS2, one patient. Following radical operation, adjuvant therapy was administered to 52 patients (Stage I; seven cases, Stage II; 23 cases; Stage III; 11 cases, and Stage IV; 11 cases). Chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and chemoradiotherapy were treated in 12, 18, and 22 patients, respectively (Table 1). The median follow-up period was 29 months (range, 2–114 months).
Table 1

Characteristics of 130 patients with OSCC

CharacteristicsNumber of patients
Gender 
 Male113
 Female17
Age 
 <6044
 ≧6086
Pathological stage(UICC) 
 I40
 IIA21
 IIB20
 III29
 IVA8
 IVB12
Primary tumour 
 T156
 T216
 T346
 T412
Regional lymph node 
 N064
 N166
Distant Metastasis 
 M0108
 M122
Histological type 
 G131
 G263
 G336
Performance status 
 P0114
 P115
 P21
Adjuvant therapy 
 Chemotherapy12
 Radiotherapy18
 Chemoradiotherapy22
 None78

Expression of HIF-1α

A total of 130 OSCCs were grouped as 42 HIF-1α negative tumours; 15 HIF-1α 1+tumours; 33 HIF-1α 2+tumours; 30 HIF-1α 3+tumours; and 10 HIF-1α 4+tumours (Figure 1). Thus, 40 tumours (30.8%) were classified as showing high HIF-1α expression.
Figure 1

Representative photomicrographs of immunohistochemical staining of HIF1α (× 200). Tumour cell immunoreactivity was scored based on nuclear and cytoplasmic staining. (A) −, no staining (B) 1+, nuclear staining in less than 1% of cells (C) nuclear staining in 1-10% of cells and/or with weak cytoplasmic staining (D) 3+, nuclear staining in 10-50% of cells and/or with distinct cytoplasmic staining, (E) 4+, nuclear staining in more than 50% of cells and/or with strong cytoplasmic staining. (F) HIF-1α-positive cells are already found in carcinoma in situ.

Representative photomicrographs of immunohistochemical staining of HIF1α (× 200). Tumour cell immunoreactivity was scored based on nuclear and cytoplasmic staining. (A) −, no staining (B) 1+, nuclear staining in less than 1% of cells (C) nuclear staining in 1-10% of cells and/or with weak cytoplasmic staining (D) 3+, nuclear staining in 10-50% of cells and/or with distinct cytoplasmic staining, (E) 4+, nuclear staining in more than 50% of cells and/or with strong cytoplasmic staining. (F) HIF-1α-positive cells are already found in carcinoma in situ. The frequency of high HIF-1α expression increased with tumour stage according to pTNM system: 15.0% of stage I (six of 40 cases), 26.8% of stage II (11 of 41 cases), 44.8% of stage III (13 of 29 cases), and 50.0% of stage IV (10 of 20 cases; Table 2).
Table 2

Hypoxia-inducible factor 1α expression in OSCC by tumour stage

 HIF-1α expression
 
 Low expression
High expression
 
Histopathologic stage1+2+3+4+No. of high-expression cases
Stage I17611606/40(15.0%)
Stage II172119211/41(26.8%)
Stage III6377613/29(44.8%)
Stage IV2448210/20(50.0%)
High HIF-1α expression correlated with the depth of tumour invasion (P=0.0186), lymph node metastasis (P=0.0035), distant metastasis (P=0.0320), pTNM stage (P=0.0019), lymphatic invasion (P=0.0492), and positive surgical margin (P=0.0156) (Table 3).
Table 3

Correlation between clinicopathologic features and HIF 1α expression in surgical specimens of OSCC

 HIF-1α expression
 
 LowHigh 
Variable(n=40)(n=90)P-value
Gender   
 Male34790.6646
 Female611 
Age   
 ≧6022640.0732
 <601826 
Double cancer   
 Yes7190.6347
 No3371 
p-Stage   
 I–II17640.0019
 III–IV2326 
Histologic grade   
 G11210.6107
 Others2969 
Depth of tumour invasion   
 I–II16560.0186
 III–IV2434 
Lymph node metastasis   
 N012520.0035
 N12838 
Distant metastasis   
 M029790.0320
 M11111 
Tumor size (cm)   
 <4.517430.5774
 >4.52347 
Lymphatic invasion   
 Positive27440.0492
 Negative1346 
Vascular invasion   
 Positive17260.1279
 Negative2364 
Surgical margin   
 Positive630.0156
 Negative3487 
Adjuvant therapy   
 Yes18340.4379
 No2256 

TNM classification system of the International Union Against Cancer.

TNM classification system of the International Union Against Cancer. HIF-1α immunoreactivity had already been identified in carcinoma in situ of oesophagus (Figure 1F).

Kaplan-Meier survival analysis

The overall 5-year survival rate was 50.4%. The survival curve of patients with a high HIF-1α expression tumours was worse than that of patients with low-expression tumours (log-rank test, P=0.0007; Figure 2).
Figure 2

Kaplan–Meier overall survival curves of patients with OSCC with and without high HIF-1α expression. P=0.0007 by the log-rank test.

Kaplan–Meier overall survival curves of patients with OSCC with and without high HIF-1α expression. P=0.0007 by the log-rank test.

Univariate survival analysis

Univariate analysis performed by Cox regression identified depth of tumour invasion (P<0.0001), distant metastasis (P=0.0002), lymph node metastasis (P<0.0001), lymphatic invasion (P=0.0021), positive surgical margin (P<0.0001), and High HIF-1α expression (P=0.0011) as correlating with survival (Table 4).
Table 4

Univariate and multivariate analysis of HIF-1α and pathologic parameters in patients undergoing curative resection of OSCC

FactorHazard ratio (95% CI)P-value
Univaruate
HIF-1α2.629 (1.472–4.694)0.0011
Gender2.820 (0.877–9.074)0.0820
Age1.013 (0.571–1.800)0.8815
Double cancer0.700 (0.339–1.445)0.3347
p-Grade1.749 (0.786–3.891)0.1704
Depth of tumour invasion4.040 (2.215–7.368)<0.0001
Lymph node metastasis5.623 (2.843–11.120)<0.0001
Distant Metastasis3.269 (1.761–6.068)0.0002
Tumour size1.729 (0.965–3.099)0.0658
Lymphatic invasion2.565 (1.406–4.681)0.0021
Vascular invasion1.536 (0.847–2.784)0.1577
Surgical margin5.181 (2.288–11.732)<0.0001
Adjuvant therapy1.018 (0.579–1.789)0.9501
 
Multivariate
HIF-1α1.539 (0.835–2.837)0.1669
Depth of tumour invasion2.646 (1.273–5.499)0.0091
Lymph node metastasis4.504 (1.984–10.226)0.0003
Distant metastasis1.036 (0.493–2.175)0.9263
Lymphatic invasion0.691 (0.314–1.520)0.3580
Surgical margin2.634 (1.057–6.561)0.0375

Multivariate survival analysis

Cox regression multivariate analysis identified depth of tumour invasion (P=0.0091), lymph node metastasis (P=0.0003), and positive surgical margin (P=0.0375), as independent unfavorable factors. High HIF-1α expression was not an independent prognostic factor (Table 4).

Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of the patient treated with adjuvant therapy

Survival in patients with a high HIF-1α expression pattern was significantly worse than in those with a low-expression pattern in the patient treated with adjuvant therapy (P=0.0464; Figure 3).
Figure 3

Kaplan–Meier overall survival curves of patients with OSCC underwent adjuvant therapy with or without high HIF-1α expression. P=0.0464 by the log-rank test.

Kaplan–Meier overall survival curves of patients with OSCC underwent adjuvant therapy with or without high HIF-1α expression. P=0.0464 by the log-rank test.

DISCUSSION

The current results show that high HIF-1α expression correlates with depth of tumour invasion, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, pTNM stage, lymphatic invasion and a positive surgical margin, and survival in patients with a high HIF-1α pattern was worse than in those with low-expression pattern. Although HIF-1α was not an independent unfavourable prognostic factor, its expression may strongly influence both tumour proliferation and lymph node metastasis in OSCC. However, it has been reported that HIF-1α overexpression was not significantly correlated with pathological parameter in other cancers, including head and neck cancer (Hockel ; Fyles ), and oropharyngeal cancer (Aebersold ). Thus, HIF-1α expression seems to behave in a tissue-dependent manner. Hypoxia has been shown to compromise the beneficial effects of chemotherapeutic drugs (Teicher, 1994) and interfere with the response of tumours to radiation (Moulder and Rockwell, 1987). Pretreatment oxygenation levels have been found to be predictive of the radiation response and survival of patients with cancer of the uterine cervix (Hockel ; Fyles ), head and neck (Gatenby ; Nordsmark ), oropharyngeal (Aebersold ), and early oesophageal cancer (Koukourakis ). In the current study, of all pathological stages, overexpression of HIF-1α in OSCC significantly correlates with an unfavourable prognosis in the patients treated with adjuvant therapies. Preoperative studies on biopsy specimens obtained by endoscopy might allow clinicians to make better-informed therapeutic decisions in conjunction with this marker. In conclusion, we have suggested that (1) high HIF-1α expression may be a marker for lymph node metastasis; and (2) high HIF-1α expression may predict an unfavourable prognosis in the patient treated with OSCC.
  29 in total

1.  Significance of immunohistochemically demonstrated micrometastases to lymph nodes in esophageal cancer with histologically negative nodes.

Authors:  S Komukai; T Nishimaki; H Watanabe; Y Ajioka; T Suzuki; K Hatakeyama
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha: a novel predictive and prognostic parameter in the radiotherapy of oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  D M Aebersold; P Burri; K T Beer; J Laissue; V Djonov; R H Greiner; G L Semenza
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Pathologic prognostic factors in Barrett's associated adenocarcinoma: a follow-up study of 96 patients.

Authors:  C Torres; J R Turner; H H Wang; W Richards; D Sugarbaker; A Shahsafaei; R D Odze
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Hypoxic regulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase via hypoxia inducible factor-1 in cardiac myocytes.

Authors:  F Jung; L A Palmer; N Zhou; R A Johns
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2000-02-18       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  Induction of phosphoglycerate kinase 1 gene expression by hypoxia. Roles of Arnt and HIF1alpha.

Authors:  H Li; H P Ko; J P Whitlock
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1996-08-30       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha is a positive factor in solid tumor growth.

Authors:  H E Ryan; M Poloni; W McNulty; D Elson; M Gassmann; J M Arbeit; R S Johnson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Recurrent esophageal carcinoma after esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection.

Authors:  H Kato; Y Tachimori; H Watanabe; H Igaki; Y Nakanishi; A Ochiai
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.454

8.  Intratumoral pO2 predicts survival in advanced cancer of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  M Höckel; C Knoop; K Schlenger; B Vorndran; E Baussmann; M Mitze; P G Knapstein; P Vaupel
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  General involvement of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 in transcriptional response to hypoxia.

Authors:  G L Wang; G L Semenza
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Hypoxia response elements in the aldolase A, enolase 1, and lactate dehydrogenase A gene promoters contain essential binding sites for hypoxia-inducible factor 1.

Authors:  G L Semenza; B H Jiang; S W Leung; R Passantino; J P Concordet; P Maire; A Giallongo
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1996-12-20       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  48 in total

1.  A novel 3-dimensional culture system as an in vitro model for studying oral cancer cell invasion.

Authors:  Hai S Duong; Anh D Le; Qunzhou Zhang; Diana V Messadi
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 2.  Prognostic value of HIF-1α expression in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Cheng-lin Zhu; Qiang Huang; Chen-hai Liu; Xian-sheng Lin; Fang Xie
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 2.316

3.  A meta-analysis of HIF-1α and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) risk.

Authors:  Guogui Sun; Wanning Hu; Yifang Lu; Yadi Wang
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.201

4.  Hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha and multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Archana Bhaskar; Bhupendra Nath Tiwary
Journal:  Int J Adv Res (Indore)       Date:  2016-01-01

5.  The histone demethylases JMJD1A and JMJD2B are transcriptional targets of hypoxia-inducible factor HIF.

Authors:  Sophie Beyer; Malene Maag Kristensen; Kim Steen Jensen; Jens Vilstrup Johansen; Peter Staller
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 as a therapeutic target in endometrial cancer management.

Authors:  Laura M S Seeber; Ronald P Zweemer; René H M Verheijen; Paul J van Diest
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2010-02-14

7.  Hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha determines gastric cancer chemosensitivity via modulation of p53 and NF-kappaB.

Authors:  Nadine Rohwer; Christof Dame; Anja Haugstetter; Bertram Wiedenmann; Katharina Detjen; Clemens A Schmitt; Thorsten Cramer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Necrosis related HIF-1alpha expression predicts prognosis in patients with endometrioid endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Laura M S Seeber; Nicole Horrée; Petra van der Groep; Elsken van der Wall; René H M Verheijen; Paul J van Diest
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  HIF-1alpha determines the metastatic potential of gastric cancer cells.

Authors:  N Rohwer; S Lobitz; K Daskalow; T Jöns; M Vieth; P M Schlag; W Kemmner; B Wiedenmann; T Cramer; M Höcker
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Expression of HIF-1alpha and VEGF in colorectal cancer: association with clinical outcomes and prognostic implications.

Authors:  Dan Cao; Mei Hou; Yong-song Guan; Ming Jiang; Yu Yang; Hong-feng Gou
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.