Susan Halabi1, Andrew J Armstrong, Oliver Sartor, Johann de Bono, Ellen Kaplan, Chen-Yen Lin, Nicole C Solomon, Eric J Small. 1. Susan Halabi, Andrew J. Armstrong, Ellen Kaplan, Chen-Yen Lin, and Nicole C. Solomon, Duke University, Durham, NC; Oliver Sartor, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA; Johann de Bono, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, United Kingdom; and Eric J. Small, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Abstract
PURPOSE:Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics, and more specifically a ≥ 30% decline in PSA within 3 months after initiation of first-line chemotherapy with docetaxel, are associated with improvement in overall survival (OS) in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The objective of this analysis was to evaluate post-treatment PSA kinetics as surrogates for OS in patients receiving second-line chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from a phase III trial of patients with mCRPC randomly assigned tocabazitaxel plus prednisone (C + P) ormitoxantrone plus prednisone were used. PSA decline (≥ 30% and ≥ 50%), velocity, and rise within the first 3 months of treatment were evaluated as surrogates for OS. The Prentice criteria, proportion of treatment explained (PTE), and meta-analytic approaches were used as measures of surrogacy. RESULTS: The observed hazard ratio (HR) for death for patients treated with C + P was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.55 to 0.79; P < .001). Furthermore, a ≥ 30% decline in PSA was a statistically significant predictor of OS (HR for death, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.64; P < .001). Adjusting for treatment effect, the HR for a ≥ 30% PSA decline was 0.50 (95% CI, 0.40 to 0.62; P < .001), but treatment remained statistically significant, thus failing the third Prentice criterion. The PTE for a ≥ 30% decline in PSA was 0.34 (95% CI, 0.11 to 0.56), indicating a lack of surrogacy for OS. The values of R(2) were < 1, suggesting that PSA decline was not surrogate for OS. CONCLUSION: Surrogacy for any PSA-based end point could not be demonstrated in this analysis. Thus, the benefits of cabazitaxel in mediating a survival benefit are not fully captured by early PSA changes.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE:Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics, and more specifically a ≥ 30% decline in PSA within 3 months after initiation of first-line chemotherapy with docetaxel, are associated with improvement in overall survival (OS) in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The objective of this analysis was to evaluate post-treatment PSA kinetics as surrogates for OS in patients receiving second-line chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from a phase III trial of patients with mCRPC randomly assigned to cabazitaxel plus prednisone (C + P) or mitoxantrone plus prednisone were used. PSA decline (≥ 30% and ≥ 50%), velocity, and rise within the first 3 months of treatment were evaluated as surrogates for OS. The Prentice criteria, proportion of treatment explained (PTE), and meta-analytic approaches were used as measures of surrogacy. RESULTS: The observed hazard ratio (HR) for death for patients treated with C + P was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.55 to 0.79; P < .001). Furthermore, a ≥ 30% decline in PSA was a statistically significant predictor of OS (HR for death, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.64; P < .001). Adjusting for treatment effect, the HR for a ≥ 30% PSA decline was 0.50 (95% CI, 0.40 to 0.62; P < .001), but treatment remained statistically significant, thus failing the third Prentice criterion. The PTE for a ≥ 30% decline in PSA was 0.34 (95% CI, 0.11 to 0.56), indicating a lack of surrogacy for OS. The values of R(2) were < 1, suggesting that PSA decline was not surrogate for OS. CONCLUSION: Surrogacy for any PSA-based end point could not be demonstrated in this analysis. Thus, the benefits of cabazitaxel in mediating a survival benefit are not fully captured by early PSA changes.
Authors: Daniel P Petrylak; Donna Pauler Ankerst; Caroline S Jiang; Catherine M Tangen; Maha H A Hussain; Primo N Lara; Jeffrey A Jones; Mary Ellen Taplin; Patrick A Burch; Manish Kohli; Mitchell C Benson; Eric J Small; Derek Raghavan; E David Crawford Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2006-04-19 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Howard I Scher; Karim Fizazi; Fred Saad; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Cora N Sternberg; Kurt Miller; Ronald de Wit; Peter Mulders; Kim N Chi; Neal D Shore; Andrew J Armstrong; Thomas W Flaig; Aude Fléchon; Paul Mainwaring; Mark Fleming; John D Hainsworth; Mohammad Hirmand; Bryan Selby; Lynn Seely; Johann S de Bono Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-08-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Medha S Darshan; Matthew S Loftus; Maria Thadani-Mulero; Benjamin P Levy; Daniel Escuin; Xi Kathy Zhou; Ada Gjyrezi; Chantal Chanel-Vos; Ruoqian Shen; Scott T Tagawa; Neil H Bander; David M Nanus; Paraskevi Giannakakou Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2011-07-28 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Johann Sebastian de Bono; Stephane Oudard; Mustafa Ozguroglu; Steinbjørn Hansen; Jean-Pascal Machiels; Ivo Kocak; Gwenaëlle Gravis; Istvan Bodrogi; Mary J Mackenzie; Liji Shen; Martin Roessner; Sunil Gupta; A Oliver Sartor Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-10-02 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Eric J Small; Susan Halabi; Mark J Ratain; Gary Rosner; Walter Stadler; David Palchak; Ernest Marshall; Randall Rago; Vera Hars; George Wilding; Daniel Petrylak; Nicholas J Vogelzang Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-08-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Daniel P Petrylak; Catherine M Tangen; Maha H A Hussain; Primo N Lara; Jeffrey A Jones; Mary Ellen Taplin; Patrick A Burch; Donna Berry; Carol Moinpour; Manish Kohli; Mitchell C Benson; Eric J Small; Derek Raghavan; E David Crawford Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-10-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ian F Tannock; Ronald de Wit; William R Berry; Jozsef Horti; Anna Pluzanska; Kim N Chi; Stephane Oudard; Christine Théodore; Nicholas D James; Ingela Turesson; Mark A Rosenthal; Mario A Eisenberger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-10-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Howard I Scher; Susan Halabi; Ian Tannock; Michael Morris; Cora N Sternberg; Michael A Carducci; Mario A Eisenberger; Celestia Higano; Glenn J Bubley; Robert Dreicer; Daniel Petrylak; Philip Kantoff; Ethan Basch; William Kevin Kelly; William D Figg; Eric J Small; Tomasz M Beer; George Wilding; Alison Martin; Maha Hussain Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Scott T Tagawa; Giuseppe Galletti; Daniel Worroll; Karla Ballman; Marie Vanhuyse; Guru Sonpavde; Scott North; Costantine Albany; Che-Kai Tsao; John Stewart; Atef Zaher; Ted Szatrowski; Wei Zhou; Ada Gjyrezi; Shinsuke Tasaki; Luigi Portella; Yang Bai; Timothy B Lannin; Shalu Suri; Conor N Gruber; Erica D Pratt; Brian J Kirby; Mario A Eisenberger; David M Nanus; Fred Saad; Paraskevi Giannakakou Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-06-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Andrew J Armstrong; Aseem Anand; Lars Edenbrandt; Eva Bondesson; Anders Bjartell; Anders Widmark; Cora N Sternberg; Roberto Pili; Helen Tuvesson; Örjan Nordle; Michael A Carducci; Michael J Morris Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: David Lorente; Joaquin Mateo; Zafeiris Zafeiriou; Alan D Smith; Shahneen Sandhu; Roberta Ferraldeschi; Johann S de Bono Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 14.432
Authors: Raquel Perez-Lopez; Joaquin Mateo; Helen Mossop; Matthew D Blackledge; David J Collins; Mihaela Rata; Veronica A Morgan; Alison Macdonald; Shahneen Sandhu; David Lorente; Pasquale Rescigno; Zafeiris Zafeiriou; Diletta Bianchini; Nuria Porta; Emma Hall; Martin O Leach; Johann S de Bono; Dow-Mu Koh; Nina Tunariu Journal: Radiology Date: 2016-11-22 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Guru Sonpavde; Gregory R Pond; Melissa Plets; Catherine M Tangen; Maha H A Hussain; Primo N Lara; Amir Goldkorn; Mark G Garzotto; Philip C Mack; Celestia S Higano; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Ian M Thompson; Przemyslaw W Twardowski; Peter J Van Veldhuizen; Neeraj Agarwal; Michael A Carducci; J Paul Monk; David I Quinn Journal: Clin Genitourin Cancer Date: 2017-05-10 Impact factor: 2.872