Literature DB >> 24101024

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) facilitated by video-assistance and anal insertion of a single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS(®))-port: preliminary experience.

Mikolaj Walensi1, Samuel A Käser, Panagiotis Theodorou, Gabrio Bassotti, Gieri Cathomas, Christoph A Maurer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is an established method for the resection of benign and early malignant rectal lesions. Very recently, TEM via an anally inserted single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS(®))-port has been proposed to overcome remaining obstacles of the classical TEM equipment.
METHODS: Nine patients with a total of 12 benign or early stage malignant rectal polyps were operated using the SILS(®)-port for TEM. Patients' and polyps' characteristics, perioperative and postoperative complications, as well as operating and hospitalization time were recorded.
RESULTS: All 12 polyps (ten low-grade adenoma, one high-grade adenoma, one pT2 carcinoma [preoperatively staged as T1]) were resected. Local full-thickness bowel wall resection was performed for three lesions and submucosal resection for nine lesions. Median operating time was 64 (range 30-180) min. No conversion to laparoscopic or open techniques was necessary. The median maximum diameter of the specimen was 25 (range 3-60) mm, fragmentation of polyps was avoidable in 11 of 12 (92 %) lesions, and resection margins were histologically clear in 11 of 12 (92 %) polyps. Only one patient, in whom three lesions were resected, experienced a complication as postoperative hemorrhage. No mortality occurred. Median hospitalization time was four (range 1-14) days.
CONCLUSIONS: SILS(®)-TEM is a feasible and safe method, providing numerous advantages in application, handling, and economy compared with the classical TEM technique. SILS(®)-TEM might become a promising alternative to classical TEM. Randomized, controlled trials comparing safety and efficacy of both instrumental settings will be needed in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24101024     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-2264-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  32 in total

1.  Use of a SILS port in transanal endoscopic microsurgery in the setting of a community hospital.

Authors:  Jacob Matz; Alexander Matz
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 1.878

2.  Transanal endoscopic video-assisted (TEVA) excision.

Authors:  Madhu Ragupathi; Dominique Vande Maele; Javier Nieto; T Bartley Pickron; Eric M Haas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward.

Authors:  Sam Atallah; Matthew Albert; Sergio Larach
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is superior to transanal excision of rectal adenomas.

Authors:  E J R de Graaf; J W A Burger; A L A van Ijsseldijk; G W M Tetteroo; I Dawson; W C J Hop
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 3.788

5.  Comparative study of NOTES rectosigmoidectomy in a swine model: E-NOTES vs. P-NOTES.

Authors:  D K Sohn; S-Y Jeong; J W Park; J S Kim; J H Hwang; D-W Kim; S-B Kang; J H Oh
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Single-port surgery and NOTES: from transanal endoscopic microsurgery and transvaginal laparoscopic cholecystectomy to transanal rectosigmoid resection.

Authors:  Gerhard F Buess; Mahesh C Misra; Hemanga K Bhattacharjee; Francisco C Becerra Garcia; Virinder K Bansal; Julio Ricardo Torres Bermudez
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.719

7.  Efficiency and outcomes of harmonic device in transanal endoscopic microsurgery compared with monopolar scalpel.

Authors:  J A Gracia; J M Ramirez; D Callejo; M Elia; S Maeso; V Aguilella; M Martinez
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  A stepwise approach to transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer using a single-incision laparoscopic port.

Authors:  Roger A Smith; Daniel A Anaya; Daniel Albo; Avo Artinyan
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Quality of life after transanal endoscopic microsurgery and total mesorectal excision in early rectal cancer.

Authors:  P G Doornebosch; R A E M Tollenaar; M P Gosselink; L P Stassen; C M Dijkhuis; W R Schouten; C J van de Velde; E J R de Graaf
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.788

10.  Measure of the voluntary contraction of the puborectal sling as a predictor of successful sphincter repair in the treatment of anal incontinence.

Authors:  Guillaume Zufferey; Thomas Perneger; Joan Robert-Yap; Raphaël Rubay; Byadran Lkhagvabayar; Bruno Roche
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) from 2010 to 2013.

Authors:  B Martin-Perez; G D Andrade-Ribeiro; L Hunter; S Atallah
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Transanal access port (TrAAP) technique: the use of a single incision laparoscopic surgical port during canine colonoscopy (a cadaveric study).

Authors:  James Howard; Judith Bertran; Valerie Parker; Jenessa Winston; Adam J Rudinsky
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 2.741

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.