Literature DB >> 19404078

Measure of the voluntary contraction of the puborectal sling as a predictor of successful sphincter repair in the treatment of anal incontinence.

Guillaume Zufferey1, Thomas Perneger, Joan Robert-Yap, Raphaël Rubay, Byadran Lkhagvabayar, Bruno Roche.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Overlapping sphincteroplasty is the surgery of choice for incontinent patients with an anterior defect after childbirth. Numerous predictive factors have been proposed, but no preoperative variables have been successfully shown to be reproducible. The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic value of voluntary contraction of the puborectal sling before sphincter repair for anal incontinence.
METHODS: This prospective study evaluated 109 consecutive women who underwent surgery for postobstetric anal incontinence. Voluntary contraction of the puborectal sling was measured by perineal ultrasound before the surgery. Severity of anal incontinence was evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively with the Miller Incontinence Score (total incontinence = 18, complete continence = 0).
RESULTS: The proportion of patients with scores <or=3 was 16.7 percent when the preoperative voluntary contraction of the puborectal sling was <or=4 mm, 48.1 percent when it was 4.1 to 8 mm, and 98.7 percent when it was >8 mm (P < 0.001). Using <or=8 mm to define abnormal shortening, the sensitivity of the test was 0.95 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.75-1.00) and specificity was 0.84 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.75-0.91).
CONCLUSION: A preoperative voluntary contraction of the puborectal sling >8 mm convincingly discriminates between patients with a good functional outcome and those with an unsatisfactory outcome after sphincter repair for postobstetric anal incontinence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19404078     DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819d46a6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  7 in total

1.  Dynamic transperineal ultrasonography correlates with prolonged pudendal nerve latency in female with fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Luigi Brusciano; Claudio Gambardella; Bruno Roche; Salvatore Tolone; Roberto Maria Romano; Francesco Tuccillo; Gianmattia Del Genio; Gianmattia Terracciano; Giorgia Gualtieri; Ludovico Docimo
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-06-28

2.  Fecal incontinence: etiology, evaluation, and treatment.

Authors:  Dana M Hayden; Eric G Weiss
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2011-03

3.  Sphincteroplasty for fecal incontinence in the era of sacral nerve modulation.

Authors:  Donato F Altomare; Michele De Fazio; Ramona Tiziana Giuliani; Giorgio Catalano; Filippa Cuccia
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Neurostimulated levator augmentation--a new approach in restoring continence.

Authors:  Christoph Isbert; Nicolas Schlegel; Joachim Reibetanz; Katica Krajinovic; Karsten Schmidt; Christoph-Thomas Germer; Mia Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Levator ani and puborectalis muscle rupture: diagnosis and repair for perineal instability.

Authors:  M S Gh Alketbi; J Meyer; J Robert-Yap; R Scarpa; E Gialamas; Z Abbassi; A Balaphas; N Buchs; B Roche; F Ris
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  3D pelvic floor ultrasound findings and severity of anal incontinence.

Authors:  G Rostaminia; D White; L H Quiroz; S A Shobeiri
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) facilitated by video-assistance and anal insertion of a single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS(®))-port: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Mikolaj Walensi; Samuel A Käser; Panagiotis Theodorou; Gabrio Bassotti; Gieri Cathomas; Christoph A Maurer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.352

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.