| Literature DB >> 24100317 |
Lakshmanane Premkumar1, Begoña Heras, Wilko Duprez, Patricia Walden, Maria Halili, Fabian Kurth, David P Fairlie, Jennifer L Martin.
Abstract
The bacterial disulfide machinery is an attractive molecular target for developing new antibacterials because it is required for the production of multiple virulence factors. The archetypal disulfide oxidase proteins in Escherichia coli (Ec) are DsbA and DsbB, which together form a functional unit: DsbA introduces disulfides into folding proteins and DsbB reoxidizes DsbA to maintain it in the active form. In Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), no DsbB homologue is encoded but a functionally similar but structurally divergent protein, MtbVKOR, has been identified. Here, the Mtb protein Rv2969c is investigated and it is shown that it is the DsbA-like partner protein of MtbVKOR. It is found that it has the characteristic redox features of a DsbA-like protein: a highly acidic catalytic cysteine, a highly oxidizing potential and a destabilizing active-site disulfide bond. Rv2969c also has peptide-oxidizing activity and recognizes peptide segments derived from the periplasmic loops of MtbVKOR. Unlike the archetypal EcDsbA enzyme, Rv2969c has little or no activity in disulfide-reducing and disulfide-isomerase assays. The crystal structure of Rv2969c reveals a canonical DsbA fold comprising a thioredoxin domain with an embedded helical domain. However, Rv2969c diverges considerably from other DsbAs, including having an additional C-terminal helix (H8) that may restrain the mobility of the catalytic helix H1. The enzyme is also characterized by a very shallow hydrophobic binding surface and a negative electrostatic surface potential surrounding the catalytic cysteine. The structure of Rv2969c was also used to model the structure of a paralogous DsbA-like domain of the Ser/Thr protein kinase PknE. Together, these results show that Rv2969c is a DsbA-like protein with unique properties and a limited substrate-binding specificity.Entities:
Keywords: DsbA; DsbB; VKOR; antibacterial target; oxidative folding; thioredoxin; virulence
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24100317 PMCID: PMC3792642 DOI: 10.1107/S0907444913017800
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr ISSN: 0907-4449
Summary of data-collection and refinement statistics
Values in parentheses are for the highest resolution shell.
| Space group |
|
| Unit-cell parameters (Å) |
|
| Data-collection wavelength (Å) | 0.9537 |
| Resolution range (Å) | 85.6–1.97 (2.08–1.97) |
| No. of observations | 286100 (39641) |
| No. of unique reflections | 35185 (5080) |
| Mean | 14.9 (3.3) |
|
| 0.096 (0.66) |
|
| 0.036 (0.246) |
| Multiplicity | 8.1 (7.8) |
| Wilson | 26.1 |
| Model and refinement statistics | |
| Resolution range (Å) | 59.3–1.97 |
| No. of unique reflections | 35175 |
| Completeness | 98.4 |
|
| 14.5 (20.3) |
|
| 19.2 (28.4) |
| No. of non-H atoms | |
| Protein | 2996 |
| Ligand | 17 |
| Water | 415 |
| R.m.s.d., bond lengths (Å) | 0.011 |
| R.m.s.d., bond angles (°) | 1.27 |
| Ramachandran favoured/allowed (%) | 97.5/99.5 |
| Average | |
| Protein | 23.7 |
| Ligand | 24.6 |
| Water | 34.6 |
R free is calculated as for R work but for 5% of the total reflections chosen at random and omitted from refinement.
Survey of Trx-related proteins in M. tuberculosis strain H37Rv
Summary of the 15 Trx-related proteins found using keyword and BLASTP searches. Only Rv2969c and Rv1743 could be considered similar to DsbA-like proteins. Structural similarities to Trx-related proteins were identified using BLASTP and Fold and Function Assignment (FFAS; http://ffas.burnham.org/) searches against PDB codes or % identity to reported structure (PDB code in parentheses) are given. The functional annotation, presence and location of signal peptide/membrane-spanning region and operon are derived information from Target TB annotation (http://genome.tbdb.org/). The presence of signal sequence and transmembrane region were also confirmed using SignalP3.0 and transmembrane prediction using hidden Markov models (TMHMM). DsbA-like (Rv2969c) is predicted to have an N-terminal transmembrane (TM) helix or signal peptide (SP).
| Protein | Length | Functional annotation | Signal peptide | Structural representative | Operon |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PknE-DsbA (Rv1743) | 566 | Ser/Thr kinase | Integral membrane |
| Ser-Thr protein kinase, fused DsbA-like |
| DsbA-like (Rv2969c) | 255 | Conserved, unknown | TM or SP | Present work | Pyruvate carboxylase-like, VKOR, Dsb-like |
| DsbE (Rv2878c) | 173 | Unknown | Yes |
| Rv2877c, DsbE |
| DsbF (Rv1677) | 182 | Unknown | Yes |
| Rv1676, DsbF |
| ResA-like (Rv3673c) | 227 | Unknown | Yes | 30% (DsbE/F) | Rv3673c, endonuclease III |
| Trx-related (Rv0526) | 216 | Unknown | Yes | 47% ( | HemeL, Rv0525, Rv0526, ccdA, Rv0528, ccsA |
| TrxC (Rv3914) | 116 | Disulfide exchange | No |
| TrxB2, TrxC |
| TrxB2 (Rv3913) | 335 | Disulfide reductase | No |
| TrxB2, TrxC |
| TrxB1 (Rv1471) | 123 | Disulfide exchange | No | 36% ( | TrxA, TrxB1 |
| TrxA (Rv1470) | 124 | Disulfide exchange | No | 32% ( | TrxA, TrxB1 |
| Trx-like (Rv0816c) | 140 | Disulfide exchange | ?? | 28% ( | Rv0816c, Rv0817c |
| Trx-like (Rv2183c) | 131 | Conserved, unknown | ?? | 14% ( | Rv2183c, Rv2184c |
| Trx-fusion protein (Rv1324) | 304 | Disulfide exchange | No | 24% ( | Rv1324 |
| Trx-related (Rv2286c) | 230 | Conserved, unknown | No | 20% ( | Rv2286c |
| Trx-related (Rv2466c) | 207 | Unknown | No | 14% ( | Rv2466c |
Figure 1Characterization of the redox properties of MtbDsbA. (a) pK a determination of the nucleophilic cysteine of MtbDsbA. This is a representative plot of three independent measurements of the pH-dependent thiolate-specific absorbance of the catalytic cysteine. The pK a was obtained from the nonlinear fit to the Henderson–Hasselbach equation. (b) Determination of the redox equilibria of MtbDsbA with glutathione at pH 7.0 and 298 K. The plot shows the averaged fraction (three replicates) of reduced MtbDsbA at various ratios of reduced:oxidized glutathione. The resulting equilibrium constant K eq (17.37 ± 0.1 µM) from the nonlinear curve fit for a one-site binding equation was used to calculate the redox potential of MtbDsbA relative to the glutathione (GSH/GSSG) standard potential of −240 mV (Gilbert, 1995 ▶). (c) Relative thermal stability of oxidized (grey) and reduced (black) MtbDsbA at pH 7.0. The normalized average far-UV CD signal from three measurements was fitted to a two-state unfolding model as described previously (Kurz et al., 2009 ▶). The resulting melting temperature (T m) of MtbDsbA shows that its reduced form (351.7 ± 0.1 K) is more stable than its oxidized form (338.6 ± 0.1 K).
Figure 2Ability of MtbDsbA to recognize EcDsbB. (a) Restoration of E. coli motility. Constructs expressing MtbDsbA or EcDsbA (control) were transformed into E. coli DsbA null (JCB817) and DsbA/DsbB double null (JCB818) mutant cells. FlgI function is impaired in the absence of EcDsbA or EcDsbB owing to the absence of disulfide-bonding activity (Dailey & Berg, 1993 ▶). The ability to recognize EcDsbB and EcDsbA substrates in vivo by MtbDsbA was evaluated by restoration of E. coli motility in the agar, as seen in the induced EcDsbA control. Shown is the summary of three replicates of induced (containing arabinose) and uninduced bacterial swarming plates (not containing arabinose, as a negative control). See Supplementary Fig. S2 for bacterial plate images. (b) Ubiquinone reduction of EcDsbB–UQ1 by MtbDsbA. The data presented here are the normalized mean absorbance of UQ1 from three independent measurements. EcDsbB was added to the EcDsbA/UQ1 mixture to initiate the reaction.
Figure 3Disulfide oxidoreductase activities. (a) Disulfide oxidase activity. Representative fluorescence curves of peptide cysteine oxidation by MtbDsbA and EcDsbA in the presence of glutathione as the electron donor. Enzyme-catalyzed peptide oxidation is significantly faster than the glutathione-mediated reaction. Peptide oxidation in the buffer control or by the catalytically inactive MtbDsbA (Cys89Ala) or EcDsbA (Cys33Ala) was insignificant over the duration of the assay (not shown for clarity). (b) Insulin disulfide-reduction assay. The precipitation of insulin by MtbDsbA or EcDsbA or DTT (trace overlaps that of EcDsbA) was monitored as described in §2. (c) Scrambled RNase disulfide isomerization assay. Disulfide isomerization activity of MtbDsbA, EcDsbA and EcDsbC was monitored using scrambled RNase as the substrate.
Figure 4Structural comparison of MtbDsbA. (a) The crystal structure of MtbDsbA (left) is compared with the prototypical EcDsbA (right; PDB entry 1fvk; Guddat et al., 1998 ▶). Catalytic/noncatalytic cysteine residues are shown as light grey spheres. The noncatalytic structural disulfide of MtbDsbA is absent in EcDsbA. Helix H8 appears to be unique to MtbDsbA. The orientation of helix H5 dramatically varies in these two proteins. Gly204 breaks the hydrogen-bonding pattern in the middle of helix H6 of MtbDsbA (helix H6 is kinked in MtbDsbA compared with EcDsbA). MtbDsbA appears to be much smaller in size than EcDsbA in this orientation. However, the molecular surface areas of MtbDsbA (8208 Å2) and EcDsbA (8670 Å2) are comparable. The intramolecular interaction of helix H1 with the C-terminal region of (b) MtbDsbA, (c) EcDsbA (PDB entry 1fvk; Guddat et al., 1998 ▶) and (d) VcDsbA (PDB entry 1bed; Hu et al., 1997 ▶) is also shown. For (b), (c) and (d) the backbone colour is set to the temperature factor from the PDB. The side chains of interfacing residues identified by PISA (Protein Interfaces, Surfaces and Assemblies; Krissinel & Henrick, 2007 ▶) analysis are shown as sticks. Catalytic and noncatalytic cysteines are shown as grey spheres.
Figure 5Structural elements of DsbAs and the catalytic site of MtbDsbA. (a) Structure-based sequence alignment of DsbAs. Structurally equivalent positions (upper case), variable regions (lower case) and insertions (dashes) are shown. PknE DsbA sequence alignment is based on MtbDsbA and BsDsbA (see Supplementary Fig. S6 for the PknE hypothetical model). Secondary-structure assignments for MtbDsbA (top green), EcDsbA (bottom blue) and topological variations originating at strand β1 in MtbDsbA and EcDsbA (orange) are presented. The catalytic motif and cis-Pro motif are highlighted in cyan and the equivalent EcDsbA residues involved in partner/substrate interaction are highlighted in orange. A negatively charged residue (Glu165) in the vicinity of the catalytic cysteine, a residue blocking the hydrophobic groove (Trp226) and a noncatalytic structural disulfide bond are marked with red arrows (see text for details). (b) The structure of the catalytic face of MtbDsbA. Residues forming the putative binding surface and negatively charged residues neighbouring the catalytic cysteine are shown. The inset displays the 2mF o− DF c electron-density map around the catalytic motif, the cis-Pro loop and ordered active-site water molecules (1.0σ contour level).
Analysis of the interface between helix H1 and the C-terminal region of DsbA structures
The buried surface area (BSA) in helix H1 (column 3) was determined using PISA analysis (Krissinel & Henrick, 2007 ▶). DsbAs, their PDB codes (column 1, in parentheses) and the residue ranges in helix H1 (column 2, in parentheses) and the C-terminal region (column 4, in parentheses) included in the PISA analysis are listed. The percentage of surface area buried in helix H1 relative to its total accessible surface area (∼2000 Å2) is given in column 3 (in parentheses). For MtbDsbA and EcDsbA, BSA and the values reported for the percentage of surface area buried are an average of two MtbDsbA chains (molecule 1 and molecule 2 in the asymmetric unit) and nine EcDsbA chains [PDB entries 1dsb (two chains; Martin et al., 1993 ▶), 1fvk (two chains; Guddat et al., 1997 ▶), 1a2m (two chains; Guddat et al., 1998 ▶), 1a2l (two chains; Guddat et al., 1998 ▶) and 1a2j (one chain; Guddat et al., 1998 ▶)].
| Protein (PDB code) | No. of interfacing residues in helix H1 | Helix H1 BSA (Å2) | No. of interfacing residues in C-terminal region |
|---|---|---|---|
| MtbDsbA | 13 (89–109) | 592 ± 4 (29.6) | 18 (226–255) |
| EcDsbA | 9 (30–50) | 401 ± 42 (18.9) | 10 (168–188) |
| BsDsbA ( | 8 (69–91) | 355 (15.9) | 8 (205–222) |
| SaDsbA ( | 9 (26–46) | 370 (15.8) | 7 (167–178) |
| PaDsbA ( | 7 (37–55) | 282 (14.3) | 9 (166–192) |
| VcDsbA ( | 8 (30–48) | 261 (13.7) | 6 (164–181) |
| WpDsbA ( | 9 (51–71) | 363 (16.5) | 9 (196–218) |
| NmDsbA1 ( | 7 (57–74) | 290 (15.5) | 7 (189–212) |
Figure 6Comparison of surface properties. (a) Hydrophobicity surface presentations for MtbDsbA and EcDsbA. Surface colourings are mapped to the Kyte–Doolittle hydrophobicity scale from purple (most hydrophilic) to white to tan (most hydrophobic). The MtbDsbA structure is shown (left) with the modelled VKOR peptide (VPSCNV) and crystallographically identified artificial ligand 1,4-dioxane (see text and Supplementary Fig. S4 for details). The EcDsbA–EcDsbB complex structure is shown on the right (PDB entry 3e9j; Malojcić et al., 2008 ▶). For clarity only the periplasmic loop segment ‘PFATCDF’ of EcDsbB is shown. Electrostatic surface comparisons of (b) MtbDsbA, (c) the hypothetical model of PknE DsbA and (d) EcDsbA. Electrostatic surface potential is contoured between −6 (red) and +6 (blue) kT/e. The homology model of PknE (template based on MtbDsbA and BsDsbA) was prepared in MODELLER (Eswar et al., 2006 ▶) and atomic clashes were minimized in Chiron (Ramachandran et al., 2011 ▶).
Thermodynamic parameters for VKOR-derived peptides binding to MtbDsbA
K d,app, apparent dissociation constant; ΔH, enthalpy change; TΔS, temperature (K) × entropy change; N is the apparent stoichiometry. TΔS is calculated from the free energy equation (ΔH − TΔS = −RTlnK d,app). Values reported are the mean and standard deviation of the curve fits from two ITC runs in each case. Representative ITC profiles are provided in Supplementary Fig. S5. n.b., no binding detected. 1 cal = 4.184 J.
|
|
| Δ | − | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIYVPSCNVNP | 1.0 | 3.8 ± 0.2 | −10.9 ± 0.0 | 3.5 |
| VPSCNVNP | 1.0 | 5.9 ± 2.6 | −7.1 ± 4.0 | 2.5 |
| VPSCNV | 1.0 | 6.7 ± 0.0 | −6.8 ± 0.2 | −0.1 |
| VPSLNV | n.b. | |||
| YVPSCNV | 1.1 | 2.9 ± 0.3 | −7.0 ± 0.4 | −0.5 |
| YVPSANV | n.b. |