INTRODUCTION: To describe changes in workplace physical activity, and health-, and work-related outcomes, in workers who transitioned from a conventional to an 'activity-permissive' workplace. METHODS: A natural pre-post experiment conducted in Vancouver, Canada in 2011. A convenience sample of office-based workers (n=24, 75% women, mean [SD] age = 34.5 [8.1] years) were examined four months following relocation from a conventional workplace (pre) to a newly-constructed, purpose-built, movement-oriented physical environment (post). Workplace activity- (activPAL3-derived stepping, standing, and sitting time), health- (body composition and fasting cardio-metabolic blood profile), and work- (performance; job satisfaction) related outcomes were measured pre- and post-move and compared using paired t-tests. RESULTS: Pre-move, on average (mean [SD]) the majority of the day was spent sitting (364 [43.0] mins/8-hr workday), followed by standing (78.2 [32.1] mins/8-hr workday) and stepping (37.7 [15.6] mins/8-hr workday). The transition to the 'activity-permissive' workplace resulted in a significant increase in standing time (+18.5, 95% CI: 1.8, 35.2 mins/8-hr workday), likely driven by reduced sitting time (-19.7, 95% CI: -42.1, 2.8 mins/8-hr workday) rather than increased stepping time (+1.2, 95% CI: -6.2, 8.5 mins/8-hr workday). There were no statistically significant differences observed in health- or work-related outcomes. DISCUSSION: This novel, opportunistic study demonstrated that the broader workplace physical environment can beneficially impact on standing time in office workers. The long-term health and work-related benefits, and the influence of individual, organizational, and social factors on this change, requires further evaluation.
INTRODUCTION: To describe changes in workplace physical activity, and health-, and work-related outcomes, in workers who transitioned from a conventional to an 'activity-permissive' workplace. METHODS: A natural pre-post experiment conducted in Vancouver, Canada in 2011. A convenience sample of office-based workers (n=24, 75% women, mean [SD] age = 34.5 [8.1] years) were examined four months following relocation from a conventional workplace (pre) to a newly-constructed, purpose-built, movement-oriented physical environment (post). Workplace activity- (activPAL3-derived stepping, standing, and sitting time), health- (body composition and fasting cardio-metabolic blood profile), and work- (performance; job satisfaction) related outcomes were measured pre- and post-move and compared using paired t-tests. RESULTS: Pre-move, on average (mean [SD]) the majority of the day was spent sitting (364 [43.0] mins/8-hr workday), followed by standing (78.2 [32.1] mins/8-hr workday) and stepping (37.7 [15.6] mins/8-hr workday). The transition to the 'activity-permissive' workplace resulted in a significant increase in standing time (+18.5, 95% CI: 1.8, 35.2 mins/8-hr workday), likely driven by reduced sitting time (-19.7, 95% CI: -42.1, 2.8 mins/8-hr workday) rather than increased stepping time (+1.2, 95% CI: -6.2, 8.5 mins/8-hr workday). There were no statistically significant differences observed in health- or work-related outcomes. DISCUSSION: This novel, opportunistic study demonstrated that the broader workplace physical environment can beneficially impact on standing time in office workers. The long-term health and work-related benefits, and the influence of individual, organizational, and social factors on this change, requires further evaluation.
Authors: Jannique G Z van Uffelen; Jason Wong; Josephine Y Chau; Hidde P van der Ploeg; Ingrid Riphagen; Nicholas D Gilson; Nicola W Burton; Genevieve N Healy; Alicia A Thorp; Bronwyn K Clark; Paul A Gardiner; David W Dunstan; Adrian Bauman; Neville Owen; Wendy J Brown Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Genevieve N Healy; Charles E Matthews; David W Dunstan; Elisabeth A H Winkler; Neville Owen Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2011-01-11 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Genevieve N Healy; Elizabeth G Eakin; Anthony D Lamontagne; Neville Owen; Elisabeth A H Winkler; Glen Wiesner; Lynn Gunning; Maike Neuhaus; Sheleigh Lawler; Brianna S Fjeldsoe; David W Dunstan Journal: Prev Med Date: 2013-04-15 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Lorraine Lanningham-Foster; Randal C Foster; Shelly K McCrady; Chinmay U Manohar; Teresa B Jensen; Naim G Mitre; James O Hill; James A Levine Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2008-05-29 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Genevieve N Healy; David W Dunstan; Jo Salmon; Jonathan E Shaw; Paul Z Zimmet; Neville Owen Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: J Aaron Hipp; Dominic N Reeds; Margaret A van Bakergem; Christine M Marx; Ross C Brownson; Surya C Pamulapati; Christine M Hoehner Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2015-05-07 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Jaime R Strickland; Amy A Eyler; Jason Q Purnell; Anna M Kinghorn; Cynthia Herrick; Bradley A Evanoff Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2015-05-07 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Jonine M Jancey; Sarah McGann; Robyn Creagh; Krysten D Blackford; Peter Howat; Marian Tye Journal: Aust N Z J Public Health Date: 2015-10-11 Impact factor: 2.939
Authors: Sarah L Mullane; Meynard J L Toledo; Sarah A Rydell; Linda H Feltes; Brenna Vuong; Noe C Crespo; Mark A Pereira; Matthew P Buman Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2017-08-31 Impact factor: 6.457