Literature DB >> 24098225

N-(2-Methyl-phen-yl)-1,2-benzoselen-azol-3(2H)-one.

Xu Zhu1, Ying Xu, Hongfei Han, Zhiqiang Guo, Xuehong Wei.   

Abstract

IN THE TITLE EBSELEN [SYSTEMATIC NAME: (2-phenyl-1,2-benzoisoselenazol-3-(2H)-one)] analogue, C14H11NOSe, the benzisoselenazolyl moiety (r.m.s. deviation = 0.0209 Å) is nearly perpendicular to the N-arenyl ring, making a dihedral angle of 78.15 (11)°. In the crystal, mol-ecules are linked by C-H⋯O and Se⋯O inter-actions into chains along the c-axis direction. The Se⋯O distance [2.733 (3) Å] is longer than that in Ebselen (2.571 (3) Å].

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24098225      PMCID: PMC3790406          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813024744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For general background to the properties of Ebselen, see: Bhabak & Mugesh (2010 ▶); Mugesh et al. (2001a ▶,b ▶); Mugesh & Singh (2000 ▶); Engman (1989 ▶); Parnham & Graf (1991 ▶). For related structures, see: Balkrishna et al. (2010 ▶); Bhabak & Mugesh (2007 ▶); Chang et al. (2003 ▶); Dupont et al. (1990 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C14H11NOSe M = 288.20 Monoclinic, a = 7.7319 (14) Å b = 13.491 (2) Å c = 11.913 (2) Å β = 102.625 (3)° V = 1212.6 (4) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 3.08 mm−1 T = 273 K 0.30 × 0.20 × 0.20 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996 ▶) T min = 0.459, T max = 0.578 4948 measured reflections 2133 independent reflections 1840 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.026

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.041 wR(F 2) = 0.095 S = 1.10 2133 reflections 155 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.52 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.27 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2007 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2007 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, New_Global_Publ_Block. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813024744/bg2515sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813024744/bg2515Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813024744/bg2515Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C14H11NOSeZ = 4
Mr = 288.20F(000) = 576
Monoclinic, P21/nDx = 1.579 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 2ynMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 7.7319 (14) ŵ = 3.08 mm1
b = 13.491 (2) ÅT = 273 K
c = 11.913 (2) ÅPlate, yellow
β = 102.625 (3)°0.30 × 0.20 × 0.20 mm
V = 1212.6 (4) Å3
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer2133 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1840 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.026
phi and ω scansθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.3°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)h = −7→9
Tmin = 0.459, Tmax = 0.578k = −15→16
4948 measured reflectionsl = −13→14
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.041Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.095H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.10w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0461P)2 + 0.4966P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2133 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
155 parametersΔρmax = 0.52 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.27 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Se1.09550 (5)0.78392 (3)0.72071 (3)0.04308 (16)
N0.9365 (4)0.8320 (2)0.5900 (2)0.0409 (7)
O0.8278 (4)0.8041 (2)0.3987 (2)0.0515 (7)
C11.1450 (5)0.6833 (3)0.6215 (3)0.0397 (9)
C21.2625 (5)0.6048 (3)0.6512 (3)0.0510 (10)
H21.32340.59520.72690.061*
C31.2857 (6)0.5417 (3)0.5648 (4)0.0621 (12)
H31.36490.48920.58250.074*
C41.1934 (6)0.5548 (4)0.4520 (4)0.0656 (12)
H41.21050.51110.39510.079*
C51.0771 (6)0.6323 (3)0.4247 (3)0.0550 (11)
H51.01570.64150.34910.066*
C61.0513 (5)0.6967 (3)0.5096 (3)0.0407 (9)
C70.9274 (5)0.7807 (3)0.4903 (3)0.0412 (9)
C80.8145 (5)0.9075 (3)0.6062 (3)0.0403 (9)
C90.6444 (5)0.8811 (3)0.6142 (3)0.0489 (10)
C100.5347 (6)0.9574 (4)0.6363 (3)0.0626 (12)
H100.41970.94230.64230.075*
C110.5907 (8)1.0532 (4)0.6493 (4)0.0677 (14)
H110.51421.10220.66430.081*
C120.7594 (8)1.0778 (3)0.6403 (4)0.0682 (13)
H120.79741.14330.64940.082*
C130.8721 (6)1.0048 (3)0.6179 (3)0.0525 (10)
H130.98611.02090.61070.063*
C140.5808 (7)0.7763 (3)0.6001 (5)0.0706 (14)
H14A0.55740.75860.52020.106*
H14B0.47410.76990.62820.106*
H14C0.67010.73320.64290.106*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Se0.0454 (3)0.0501 (3)0.0297 (2)0.00016 (19)−0.00047 (16)−0.00060 (16)
N0.0423 (17)0.0472 (17)0.0286 (16)0.0005 (15)−0.0025 (13)0.0000 (13)
O0.0548 (17)0.0605 (17)0.0323 (14)0.0018 (14)−0.0057 (13)0.0014 (12)
C10.039 (2)0.047 (2)0.0308 (19)−0.0045 (17)0.0041 (16)−0.0007 (16)
C20.052 (2)0.054 (2)0.042 (2)0.005 (2)−0.0005 (19)0.0055 (19)
C30.063 (3)0.062 (3)0.058 (3)0.014 (2)0.007 (2)−0.002 (2)
C40.073 (3)0.070 (3)0.053 (3)0.010 (3)0.011 (2)−0.015 (2)
C50.061 (3)0.065 (3)0.037 (2)0.002 (2)0.0058 (19)−0.003 (2)
C60.043 (2)0.046 (2)0.0316 (19)−0.0042 (17)0.0047 (17)0.0005 (16)
C70.040 (2)0.047 (2)0.034 (2)−0.0079 (18)0.0030 (17)0.0010 (16)
C80.043 (2)0.047 (2)0.0281 (18)0.0034 (18)0.0023 (16)0.0016 (16)
C90.048 (2)0.062 (3)0.036 (2)0.003 (2)0.0066 (18)0.0096 (18)
C100.053 (3)0.094 (4)0.041 (2)0.016 (3)0.012 (2)0.013 (2)
C110.091 (4)0.070 (3)0.042 (2)0.032 (3)0.015 (2)−0.001 (2)
C120.104 (4)0.050 (3)0.047 (3)0.005 (3)0.009 (3)−0.005 (2)
C130.059 (3)0.056 (3)0.040 (2)−0.008 (2)0.004 (2)−0.0039 (19)
C140.061 (3)0.070 (3)0.081 (4)−0.017 (3)0.016 (3)0.014 (3)
Se—N1.876 (3)C6—C71.470 (5)
Se—C11.894 (4)C8—C131.384 (5)
N—C71.364 (5)C8—C91.386 (5)
N—C81.429 (5)C9—C101.394 (6)
O—C71.231 (4)C9—C141.494 (6)
C1—C61.383 (5)C10—C111.361 (7)
C1—C21.389 (5)C10—H100.9300
C2—C31.377 (6)C11—C121.373 (7)
C2—H20.9300C11—H110.9300
C3—C41.388 (6)C12—C131.380 (6)
C3—H30.9300C12—H120.9300
C4—C51.371 (6)C13—H130.9300
C4—H40.9300C14—H14A0.9600
C5—C61.380 (5)C14—H14B0.9600
C5—H50.9300C14—H14C0.9600
N—Se—C185.13 (14)C13—C8—C9121.7 (4)
C7—N—C8124.7 (3)C13—C8—N118.9 (4)
C7—N—Se116.6 (2)C9—C8—N119.4 (3)
C8—N—Se117.8 (2)C8—C9—C10116.7 (4)
C6—C1—C2121.4 (4)C8—C9—C14121.9 (4)
C6—C1—Se111.9 (3)C10—C9—C14121.3 (4)
C2—C1—Se126.7 (3)C11—C10—C9122.0 (5)
C3—C2—C1117.7 (4)C11—C10—H10119.0
C3—C2—H2121.1C9—C10—H10119.0
C1—C2—H2121.1C10—C11—C12120.4 (5)
C2—C3—C4121.5 (4)C10—C11—H11119.8
C2—C3—H3119.3C12—C11—H11119.8
C4—C3—H3119.3C11—C12—C13119.5 (4)
C5—C4—C3119.9 (4)C11—C12—H12120.2
C5—C4—H4120.1C13—C12—H12120.2
C3—C4—H4120.1C12—C13—C8119.6 (4)
C4—C5—C6119.9 (4)C12—C13—H13120.2
C4—C5—H5120.1C8—C13—H13120.2
C6—C5—H5120.1C9—C14—H14A109.5
C5—C6—C1119.7 (4)C9—C14—H14B109.5
C5—C6—C7124.3 (3)H14A—C14—H14B109.5
C1—C6—C7116.0 (3)C9—C14—H14C109.5
O—C7—N123.0 (4)H14A—C14—H14C109.5
O—C7—C6126.7 (3)H14B—C14—H14C109.5
N—C7—C6110.3 (3)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C2—H2···Oi0.932.453.132 (4)130
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C2—H2⋯Oi 0.932.453.132 (4)130

Symmetry code: (i) .

  8 in total

Review 1.  Chemistry of biologically important synthetic organoselenium compounds.

Authors:  G Mugesh; W W du Mont; H Sies
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

Review 3.  Pharmacology of synthetic organic selenium compounds.

Authors:  M J Parnham; E Graf
Journal:  Prog Drug Res       Date:  1991

4.  Cu-catalyzed efficient synthetic methodology for ebselen and related Se-N heterocycles.

Authors:  Shah Jaimin Balkrishna; Bhagat Singh Bhakuni; Deepak Chopra; Sangit Kumar
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 6.005

5.  Glutathione peroxidase-like antioxidant activity of diaryl diselenides: a mechanistic study.

Authors:  G Mugesh; A Panda; H B Singh; N S Punekar; R J Butcher
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2001-02-07       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Synthesis, characterization, and antioxidant activity of some ebselen analogues.

Authors:  Krishna P Bhabak; Govindasamy Mugesh
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.236

Review 7.  Functional mimics of glutathione peroxidase: bioinspired synthetic antioxidants.

Authors:  Krishna P Bhabak; Govindasamy Mugesh
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 22.384

8.  Synthesis and biological evaluation of ebselen and its acyclic derivatives.

Authors:  Tsu-Chung Chang; Mei-Lan Huang; Wen-Lin Hsu; Jing-Min Hwang; Ling-Yih Hsu
Journal:  Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo)       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.645

  8 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Zero-, one-, two- and three-dimensional supramolecular architectures sustained by SeO chalcogen bonding: A crystallographic survey.

Authors:  Edward R T Tiekink
Journal:  Coord Chem Rev       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 22.315

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.