Nynikka R A Palmer1, Ann M Geiger, Lingyi Lu, L Douglas Case, Kathryn E Weaver. 1. Authors' Affiliations: Social Science and Health Policy, Epidemiology and Prevention, Biostatistical Sciences, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Health Services and Economics Branch, Applied Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Science, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Routine follow-up care is recommended to promote the well-being of cancer survivors, but financial difficulties may interfere. Rural-urban disparities in forgoing healthcare due to cost have been observed in the general population; however, it is unknown whether this disparity persists among survivors. The purpose of this study was to examine rural-urban disparities in forgoing healthcare after cancer due to cost. METHODS: We analyzed data from 7,804 cancer survivors in the 2006 to 2010 National Health Interview Survey. Logistic regression models, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, were used to assess rural-urban disparities in forgoing medical care, prescription medications, and dental care due to cost, stratified by age (younger: 18-64, older: 65+). RESULTS: Compared with urban survivors, younger rural survivors were more likely to forgo medical care (P < 0.001) and prescription medications (P < 0.001) due to cost; older rural survivors were more likely to forgo medical (P < 0.001) and dental care (P = 0.05). Rural-urban disparities did not persist among younger survivors in adjusted analyses; however, older rural survivors remained more likely to forgo medical [OR = 1.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.11-2.48] and dental care (OR = 1.54, 95%CI = 1.08-2.20). CONCLUSIONS: Adjustment for health insurance and other sociodemographic characteristics attenuates rural-urban disparities in forgoing healthcare among younger survivors, but not older survivors. Financial factors relating to healthcare use among rural survivors should be a topic of continued investigation. IMPACT: Addressing out-of-pocket costs may be an important step in reducing rural-urban disparities in healthcare, especially for older survivors. It will be important to monitor how healthcare reform efforts impact disparities observed in this vulnerable population.
BACKGROUND: Routine follow-up care is recommended to promote the well-being of cancer survivors, but financial difficulties may interfere. Rural-urban disparities in forgoing healthcare due to cost have been observed in the general population; however, it is unknown whether this disparity persists among survivors. The purpose of this study was to examine rural-urban disparities in forgoing healthcare after cancer due to cost. METHODS: We analyzed data from 7,804 cancer survivors in the 2006 to 2010 National Health Interview Survey. Logistic regression models, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, were used to assess rural-urban disparities in forgoing medical care, prescription medications, and dental care due to cost, stratified by age (younger: 18-64, older: 65+). RESULTS: Compared with urban survivors, younger rural survivors were more likely to forgo medical care (P < 0.001) and prescription medications (P < 0.001) due to cost; older rural survivors were more likely to forgo medical (P < 0.001) and dental care (P = 0.05). Rural-urban disparities did not persist among younger survivors in adjusted analyses; however, older rural survivors remained more likely to forgo medical [OR = 1.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.11-2.48] and dental care (OR = 1.54, 95%CI = 1.08-2.20). CONCLUSIONS: Adjustment for health insurance and other sociodemographic characteristics attenuates rural-urban disparities in forgoing healthcare among younger survivors, but not older survivors. Financial factors relating to healthcare use among rural survivors should be a topic of continued investigation. IMPACT: Addressing out-of-pocket costs may be an important step in reducing rural-urban disparities in healthcare, especially for older survivors. It will be important to monitor how healthcare reform efforts impact disparities observed in this vulnerable population.
Authors: K Robin Yabroff; William F Lawrence; Steven Clauser; William W Davis; Martin L Brown Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2004-09-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Whitney E Zahnd; Natoshia Askelson; Robin C Vanderpool; Lindsay Stradtman; Jean Edward; Paige E Farris; Victoria Petermann; Jan M Eberth Journal: Prev Med Date: 2019-08-15 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Shaila M Strayhorn; Leslie R Carnahan; Kristine Zimmermann; Theresa A Hastert; Karriem S Watson; Carol Estwing Ferrans; Yamilé Molina Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-07-24 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Whitney E Zahnd; Melinda M Davis; Jason S Rotter; Robin C Vanderpool; Cynthia K Perry; Jackilen Shannon; Linda K Ko; Stephanie B Wheeler; Cassie L Odahowski; Paige E Farris; Jan M Eberth Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-04-10 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Whitney E Zahnd; Aimee S James; Wiley D Jenkins; Sonya R Izadi; Amanda J Fogleman; David E Steward; Graham A Colditz; Laurent Brard Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Emily Hallgren; Theresa A Hastert; Leslie R Carnahan; Jan M Eberth; Scherezade K Mama; Karriem S Watson; Yamilé Molina Journal: J Health Soc Behav Date: 2020-02-01
Authors: Ann Marie Flores; Jason Nelson; Lee Sowles; Rebecca G Stephenson; Kathryn Robinson; Andrea Cheville; Antoinette P Sander; William J Blot Journal: Phys Ther Date: 2020-03-10
Authors: Brynn Fowler; Qian Ding; Lisa Pappas; Yelena P Wu; Lauri Linder; Jeff Yancey; Jennifer Wright; Margaret Clayton; Deanna Kepka; Anne C Kirchhoff Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 2.037