Literature DB >> 31342166

Comorbidities, treatment-related consequences, and health-related quality of life among rural cancer survivors.

Shaila M Strayhorn1, Leslie R Carnahan2, Kristine Zimmermann2, Theresa A Hastert3, Karriem S Watson4, Carol Estwing Ferrans5, Yamilé Molina6,7,8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We explored how lifetime comorbidities and treatment-related cancer symptoms were associated with quality of life (QOL) in rural cancer survivors.
METHODS: Survivors (n = 125) who were rural Illinois residents aged 18+ years old were recruited from January 2017 to September 2018. We conducted 4 multivariable regressions with QOL domains as outcomes (social well-being, functional well-being, mental health-MHQOL, physical health-PHQOL); the number of physical and psychological comorbidities (e.g., arthritis, high blood pressure, stroke) and treatment-related cancer symptoms (e.g., worrying, feeling sad, lack of appetite, lack of energy) as predictors; and, cancer-related and demographic factors related to these variables as covariates.
RESULTS: The number of comorbidities and number of treatment-related symptoms were inversely associated with functional well-being (Std β = - 0.36, p < 0.0001 and - 0.18, p = 0.03), and MHQOL (Std β = - 0.30, p = 0.001 and Std β = - 0.25, p = 0.004). Comorbidities were associated inversely with social well-being (Std β = - 0.27, p = .003). Comorbidities and treatment-related symptoms were not associated with PHQOL (p = 0.20-0.24). Sensitivity analyses suggested that psychological comorbidities, treatment-related psychological symptoms, and physical comorbidities were associated with social well-being, functional well-being, and MHQOL.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the utility of risk-based survivorship care plans to address the negative, additive impact of comorbidities and the treatment-related symptoms to improve the health-related QOL among rural survivors. Future research should assess how contextual factors (e.g., geographic distance to oncologists and other providers) should be incorporated in survivorship care planning and implementation for rural survivors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comorbidities; Rural; Treatment-related consequences

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31342166      PMCID: PMC6980904          DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-05005-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  44 in total

1.  The Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire: a new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research.

Authors:  Oliver Sangha; Gerold Stucki; Matthew H Liang; Anne H Fossel; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2003-04-15

2.  Physical functioning and psychological morbidity among regional and rural cancer survivors: A report from a regional cancer centre.

Authors:  Mari Lashbrook; Christina M Bernardes; Marilynne N Kirshbaum; Patricia C Valery
Journal:  Aust J Rural Health       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 1.662

3.  The Cancer Survivorship Journey: Models of Care, Disparities, Barriers, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Michael T Halpern; Mary S McCabe; Mary Ann Burg
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2016

Review 4.  Risk-based health care, the cancer survivor, the oncologist, and the primary care physician.

Authors:  Mary S McCabe; Ann H Partridge; Eva Grunfeld; Melissa M Hudson
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.929

5.  Symptom experiences and quality of life of rural and urban older adult cancer survivors.

Authors:  Susan L Beck; Gail L Towsley; Michael S Caserta; Karen Lindau; William N Dudley
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.592

6.  The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) experiences with cancer survivorship supplement.

Authors:  K Robin Yabroff; Emily Dowling; Juan Rodriguez; Donatus U Ekwueme; Helen Meissner; Anita Soni; Catherine Lerro; Gordon Willis; Laura P Forsythe; Laurel Borowski; Katherine S Virgo
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 4.442

7.  General population and cancer patient norms for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G).

Authors:  Penny S Brucker; Kathleen Yost; John Cashy; Kimberly Webster; David Cella
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.651

8.  Physical and mental health status of survivors of multiple cancer diagnoses: findings from the National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Michael A Andrykowski
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Rural-urban differences in health behaviors and implications for health status among US cancer survivors.

Authors:  Kathryn E Weaver; Nynikka Palmer; Lingyi Lu; L Douglas Case; Ann M Geiger
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 2.506

10.  Does quality of life among breast cancer survivors one year after diagnosis differ depending on urban and non-urban residence? A comparative study.

Authors:  Tracey DiSipio; Sandi C Hayes; Beth Newman; Joanne Aitken; Monika Janda
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  2 in total

1.  Assessing the relationship between patient-provider communication quality and quality of life among rural cancer survivors.

Authors:  Shaila M Strayhorn; Marquita W Lewis-Thames; Leslie R Carnahan; Vida A Henderson; Karriem S Watson; Carol E Ferrans; Yamilé Molina
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Faith as a Mechanism for Health Promotion among Rural African American Prostate Cancer Survivors: A Qualitative Examination.

Authors:  Raymond D Adams; Waldo E Johnson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.