Literature DB >> 24096111

Pathological response on surgical samples is an independent prognostic variable for patients with Stage Ib2-IIb cervical cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical hysterectomy: an Italian multicenter retrospective study (CTF Study).

A Gadducci1, E Sartori, T Maggino, P Zola, S Cosio, V Zizioli, M Lapresa, Elisa Piovano, F Landoni.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this retrospective multicenter study was to correlate patterns of recurrences and clinical outcome of cervical cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy [NACT] to surgery.
METHODS: This study was conducted on 333 patients with FIGO stage Ib2-IIb cervical cancer who underwent NACT to surgery with pelvic lymphadenectomy. The median follow-up was 66.5 months (range, 8-212 months). Overall optimal response rate was the sum of complete and optimal partial response rates.
RESULTS: An overall optimal response was obtained in 64 patients (19.2%). As for the 220 sub-optimal responders (66.1%), 127 patients had negative nodes and negative parametria and/or surgical margins, 75 patients had positive nodes with positive or negative parametria and/or surgical margins, and 18 patients had positive parametria and/or surgical margins with negative nodes. At the time of the present analysis, 79 (23.7%) of the 333 patients had a recurrence after a median time of 14.9 months (range, 4.5-123 months). Recurrent disease was pelvic in 50 (63.3%), extra-pelvic in 22 (27.9%), and both in 7 (8.8%). On multivariate analysis, pathological response to NACT was an independent prognostic variable for recurrence-free and overall survival. Patients who did not achieve an overall optimal response had a 2.757-fold higher risk of recurrence and a 5.413-fold higher risk of death than those who obtained an overall optimal response.
CONCLUSIONS: Results appear to suggest that the chemo-surgical approach is an effective therapeutic option for patients with stage Ib2-IIb cervical cancer and that pathological response to NACT is the strongest prognostic factor for the outcome.
© 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Surgery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24096111     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.09.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  26 in total

1.  Analysis of the hippo transducers TAZ and YAP in cervical cancer and its microenvironment.

Authors:  Simonetta Buglioni; Patrizia Vici; Domenico Sergi; Laura Pizzuti; Luigi Di Lauro; Barbara Antoniani; Francesca Sperati; Irene Terrenato; Mariantonia Carosi; Teresa Gamucci; Cristina Vincenzoni; Luciano Mariani; Enrico Vizza; Aldo Venuti; Giuseppe Sanguineti; Angiolo Gadducci; Maddalena Barba; Clara Natoli; Ilio Vitale; Marcella Mottolese; Ruggero De Maria; Marcello Maugeri-Saccà
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 8.110

2.  A post-recurrence survival-predicting indicator for cervical cancer from the analysis of 165 patients who developed recurrence.

Authors:  Kosuke Yoshida; Hiroaki Kajiyama; Fumi Utsumi; Kaoru Niimi; Jun Sakata; Shiro Suzuki; Kiyosumi Shibata; Fumitaka Kikkawa
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-12-08

Review 3.  Hysterectomy with radiotherapy or chemotherapy or both for women with locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Fani Kokka; Andrew Bryant; Adeola Olaitan; Elly Brockbank; Melanie Powell; David Oram
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-08-22

4.  Survival Outcomes of Patients With Stage IB3 Cervical Cancer Who Undergo Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy Versus Radiochemotherapy.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Li; Qing Yang; Jianxin Guo; Guoqiang Liang; Hui Duan; Shaoguang Wang; Min Hao; Wentong Liang; Donglin Li; Xuemei Zhan; Qinghuang Xie; Jinghe Lang; Ping Liu; Chunlin Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  Intensity-modulated extended-field chemoradiation plus simultaneous integrated boost in the pre-operative treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer: a dose-escalation study.

Authors:  Gabriella Macchia; Savino Cilla; Francesco Deodato; Francesco Legge; Aida Di Stefano; Vito Chiantera; Giovanni Scambia; Vincenzo Valentini; Alessio G Morganti; Gabriella Ferrandina
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Prognostic value of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in bulky stage Ib2 and IIa cervical squamous cell cancer patients.

Authors:  Yun Liang; Bingjian Lü; Xiaoduan Chen; Jiale Qin; Xiaodong Cheng; Xing Xie; Weiguo Lü
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Pretreatment serum lactate dehydrogenase is an independent prognostic factor for patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jing Li; Miao-Fang Wu; Huai-Wu Lu; Qing Chen; Zhong-Qiu Lin; Li-Juan Wang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.452

8.  Optimal pathological response indicated better long-term outcome among patients with stage IB2 to IIB cervical cancer submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Kecheng Huang; Haiying Sun; Zhilan Chen; Xiong Li; ShaoShuai Wang; Xiaolin Zhao; Fangxu Tang; Yao Jia; Ting Hu; Xiaofang Du; Haoran Wang; Zhiyong Lu; Jia Huang; Juan Gui; Xiaoli Wang; Shasha Zhou; Lin Wang; Jincheng Zhang; Lili Guo; Ru Yang; Jian Shen; Qinghua Zhang; Shuang Li; Shixuan Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Cost-effectiveness of radical hysterectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy versus radical radiotherapy for FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer.

Authors:  Yanlan Chai; Juan Wang; Tao Wang; Fan Shi; Jiquan Wang; Jin Su; Yunyi Yang; Xi Zhou; Hailin Ma; Bin He; Zi Liu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Radical hysterectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy versus radical radiotherapy for FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer.

Authors:  Yanlan Chai; Tao Wang; Juan Wang; Yunyi Yang; Ying Gao; Jiyong Gao; Shangfeng Gao; Yueling Wang; Xi Zhou; Zi Liu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.