Literature DB >> 24095973

Quality measures for colonoscopy: a critical evaluation.

Nabil F Fayad1, Charles J Kahi2.   

Abstract

In a recent article in The New York Times, "The $2.7 Trillion Medical Bill,"(1) colonoscopy was singled out for its cost. In their response, the leading gastroenterology professional societies highlighted colonoscopy's effectiveness and cost-effectiveness for the prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC). Affirming colonoscopy's central role in CRC prevention, both as a frontline test and as the final common pathway for other CRC screening modalities, requires strategies to measure and improve colonoscopy quality, particularly by controlling operator-dependent factors. Although colonoscopy is a powerful CRC screening test,(2-6) several recent studies have highlighted decreased protection, mainly against right-sided CRC,(5,7-16) an observation that has been linked to performance quality.
Copyright © 2014 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonoscopy; Colorectal Neoplasms; Quality

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24095973     DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.09.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  14 in total

1.  Colonoscopy in Lynch syndrome: the need for a new quality score.

Authors:  Jurjen J Boonstra; Wouter H de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel; Alexandra M J Langers; Hedwig van der Sluis; James H Hardwick; Hans F A Vasen
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Impact of an Endoscopic Quality Improvement Program Focused on Adenoma Detection on Sessile Serrated Adenoma/Polyp Detection.

Authors:  Ronald G Racho; Murli Krishna; Susan G Coe; Colleen S Thomas; Julia E Crook; Nancy N Diehl; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Commentary: It's more than just the price.

Authors:  Harold S Luft
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Screening Colonoscopy Withdrawal Time Threshold for Adequate Proximal Serrated Polyp Detection Rate.

Authors:  Viral D Patel; William K Thompson; Brittany R Lapin; Jay L Goldstein; Eugene F Yen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  Colorectal Cancer Screening in Asia.

Authors:  Han-Mo Chiu; Wen-Feng Hsu; Li-Chun Chang; Ming-Hsiang Wu
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2017-08-10

6.  Practice and documentation of performance of colonoscopy in a central Canadian health region.

Authors:  Harminder Singh; Lisa Kaita; Gerry Taylor; Zoann Nugent; Charles Bernstein
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-04

7.  Optimizing Colonoscopy Quality: From Bowel Preparation to Surveillance.

Authors:  Carla G Abou Fadel; Rani H Shayto; Ala I Sharara
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03

Review 8.  Establishing a biological profile for interval colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Amy L Cisyk; Harminder Singh; Kirk J McManus
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  National Lung Cancer Screening Utilization Trends in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Jennifer A Lewis; Lauren R Samuels; Jason Denton; Gretchen C Edwards; Michael E Matheny; Amelia Maiga; Christopher G Slatore; Eric Grogan; Jane Kim; Robert H Sherrier; Robert S Dittus; Pierre P Massion; Laura Keohane; Sayeh Nikpay; Christianne L Roumie
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2020-06-13

10.  Simple feedback of colonoscopy performance improved the number of adenomas per colonoscopy and serrated polyp detection rate.

Authors:  Osamu Toyoshima; Shuntaro Yoshida; Toshihiro Nishizawa; Tadahiro Yamakawa; Toru Arano; Yoshihiro Isomura; Takamitsu Kanazawa; Hidehiko Ando; Yosuke Tsuji; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-06-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.